Adcom GCD-750 CD Players
Adcom GCD-750 CD Players
[Jul 29, 2001]
Scott
Audiophile
Strength:
None for this price. It stages well but sounds TERRIBLE!
Weakness:
Transistorized sound, bright and grainy This is a typical Burr Brown sounding player. Don't take my advise but listen to the similar priced CAL CL-15 and then comment. This player made me NOT LISTEN to my system. Thank god I have a Basis turntable system or I would have gone crazy. Stereophile must receive alot of dollars from Adcom, obviously, because this should never have been awarded the praise that it has received. It sounds shrill, confined and NOT musical. I purchased Adcoms top pre and amp and they are wonderful and were way less costly than my last setup (that was over $10,000 more!). Take my advise and listen to the CAL side by side, you will definately hear the difference or you should give up being an audiophile! Similar Products Used: EAD, California Audio Labs, CJ |
[Feb 13, 2001]
Blake H.
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Crisp Sound, Build Quality
Weakness:
Yes, the display REALLY IS that bad! I'd have to agree with what most people have said so far. It would be hard to beat this unit in build quality or sound for under $2500. Solid reproduction of the entire sonic scale -- crisp highs & deep lows. HDCD decoding is a plus. Also allows another digital device to be plugged into the back via coax/optical input to use Adcom's superior D/A converter. Similar Products Used: Nakamichi MB-2, Nakamichi OMS-5 |
[Dec 10, 1997]
Bob Kumagai
an Audio Enthusiast
After 4 years of so-so performance and reliability from an Adcom 5CD changer, I decided to return to a single disc CD player. The marginal build quality of my old Adcom changer made me decide to pass on their current offerings and I looked hard at the CAL CL-15, Meridian 506.20, and even a Sonic Frontiers tube player (tremendous sound, but too many bucks for a living room that has the sounds of two small kids, dishwasher, TV, etc. to compete with). After much cajoling from a salesman, I tried the new Adcom GCD-750, a new design from Nelson Pass and part of their new triad of amp, pre-amp and player. Suffice it to say, this is not your father's Adcom! |
[Jan 29, 1998]
Syed
an Audiophile
I have tried two units of this player in my system. The first had been an open box item. It was lacking bass impact and on the whole I was not happy with it. |
[Jan 29, 1998]
Syed
an Audiophile
I have tried two units of this player in my system. The first had been an open box item. It was lacking bass impact and on the whole I was not happy with it. |
[Apr 29, 1998]
John
an Audiophile
I will have to admit that I too was quite impressed with this player. The sound was very pleasant overall. Highs are clean with high resolution that just borders on being bright but still had a non-fatiguing sound. Midrange and bass were both very dynamic and tuneful - very good resolution in the lower frequency registers. |
[May 10, 1998]
Noee
an Audio Enthusiast
Sorry, but after spending all night and most of the morning with this unit, I am going to have to recend my review from earlier. Yes, this is absolutely the best $1000 CD player I have heard. The detail is outstanding. The new "Kind of Blue" 20bit remaster (in the right key) basically puts Davis and Coltrane in the room with you. I was going to try to point out a couple of select phrases on the disc, but there is no way to do that. If you don't own this recording (even if you're not a Jazz fan), you are missing out. Here are the problems I have had in the last 24 hours with this unit: |
[May 10, 1998]
David Li
an Audio Enthusiast
Typical Adcom sound. Amusical, lean and mechanical. Bass is overdone and highs are very harsh and reticent. The mids simply are not musical. This player is easily outperfirmed by budget players like the Marantz 63. Not recommended even at half the price. |
[May 09, 1998]
Jeff Million
an Audio Enthusiast
When auditioning new CD players I tries the Acurus ACD-11,Cal Labs Ikon mk2,and Adcom GCD-750.The system I listened on consisted of Adcom & Aragon amps,Adcom & Aragon pre-amps,Klipsch & Dunlavy speakers,& various types of Tara Labs cables.I ruled out the Acurus real quick(see review)but when it came time between this and the Cal Labs Icon mk2 it was tough.The Adcom sounds fantastic producing almost every sound in a very real manner.The thing that made the choice a tough one is that the Cal Labs sounded just as good.I really couldn't tell the difference between the two.Even though it was $100 more I ended up with The Adcom because it's looks appealed to me more.However,sonicaly either one would make a great player.Highly recommended. |
[May 09, 1998]
Noee
an Audio Enthusiast
I too auditioned this player against the CAL Icon MKII and the new Denon (I don't know the model). I could tell a difference between all three with the CAL and Denon being closer in my opinion and the Adcom standing out from these two uniquely. SPecifically, the cut Mary on Sarah McLauchlan's Freedom Sessions sounded as close to live as I've heard. A 20bit remastered AJA also contained more detail than I've heard before. I also tried a 24bit Santana III and concluded the the Adcom just gives more detail, presence and "air" to the sound. Even my girlfriend can't believe the difference between the Adcom and my DVD player playing music. |