Adcom GCD-750 CD Players
Adcom GCD-750 CD Players
[Jul 08, 1998]
Christopher
an Audiophile
As a follow up to my previous review, Adcom has agreed to accept the unit as an RMA and apply a fix which they indicate will rectify this problem. The next production run of the unit should have this fix already installed. I will post the results of the fix when available. |
[Jun 16, 1998]
Greg I.
an Audio Enthusiast
I've had the Adcom 750 CD player for about six weeks. I love the sound this component creates. This was reaffirmed recently after evaluating the $2000 Pioneer DL-09 CD/DVD player. The DL-09 is an excellent DVD player, but the audio simply was not as enjoyable as the Adcom. The key factor in the Adcom sound is realism. Voices, instruments, soundstage, depth all have a realisticquality I found lacking in the Pioneer. |
[Jul 31, 1998]
Christopher
an Audiophile
Epilog: The system has come back from RMA and the problem hasn't been fixed and the sound quality has noticeably deteriorated. Adcom admits this is a design problem. I consider this a defective product in its design, I believe that Adcom's work around doesn't fix the problem and hurts the sound quality, I would strongly urge anyone shopping for a CD player to look elsewhere. |
[Oct 30, 1998]
Bruce Kwasha
an Audiophile
After spending a weekend comparing the Adcom 750 to a Theta Miles, I came to the conclusion that their sound quality was equivalent. One caveat, the Adcom should always be left on. If turned off, it takes quite a while to return to its best (i.e. many hours). |
[Nov 28, 1998]
Brent Bersin
an Audio Enthusiast
I spent about six months listening to various upper-end CD players to replace the Marantz I had in my system. After listeniing to many CD players and DAC's in the $1,000 - $3,000 price range, I found this CD player to be the best overall. Notice I didn't say "for the money"; just the best. Quite honestly, it is so musical and so good, if I had $10,000 to spend solely on a CD, I'd stick with the Adcom. It's that good, and sounds great on all types of music, including real rock CD's; not the ones Stereophile, etc. write about. |
[Jun 09, 1999]
Mauri Rintamaki
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased a GCD-750 which was on sale on consignment at a Audio Store. I listened to the Adcom about 6 months ago, and thought it was very good ; but, thought spending over $2k Canadian was too much at that time. Subsequently, I bought a Harmon Kardon FL8550 , which sounded quite good , and was priced right for what I was willing to spend at that time. It also sounded better than any single disc Cd players in the same price range. My intent was to put it on my AV system after I found the CD player I really wanted. The HK was frustrating untill a fix was delivered for the disk sensor; otherwise it was great in the price range. After purchasing the Adcom and comparing it to the FL8550, I realize you get what you pay for. The Adcom provides better imaging, deeper bass, better timbre, dynamics, more detail, etc . It sounds better to me many ways, than the Classe .5, any Cambridge product (CD4SE,CD6), Marantz (67SE), Rega Planet, Primare, Audiolab (8000), Audio Refinement (CD Complete)that I auditioned.My only complaints; which are minor, considering the performance, are that the remote does not have many functions, and the display could be better. |
[Aug 07, 1999]
T.C.
an Audiophile
I have been with the GCD-750 for two weeks and have thoroughly enjoyed it. Low level detail is reproduced much more like high quality analog systems. Ambient information,image focus,neutral tonal balance,dynamics,and tangible soundstage all create a very involving musical experience. HDCD is the most significant improvement in digital playback now available in mid-priced systems. Adcom has a great product that deserves audition when shopping in this price range. The decision to change this link was easy after only a few minutes of listening time. My last player was a "recommended component." It now goes to the office for background music. With the GCD-750, I am much more satisfied with music reproduction from my system. I believe that is what we are all seeking. |
[Nov 24, 1999]
Petrusky
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound, detail, timbre, smooth vocal
Weakness:
Hard to read display David! Similar Products Used: Rotel 965SE, Rotel 971, Rega Planet |
[Dec 30, 1999]
Scott C
Strength:
Superb CD Player with HDCD and first rate D/A.
Weakness:
You better be looking at that display head-on or forget it! After about 30 hours of listening the GCD-750 really came alive! At first the mids were really laid back with overwhelming bass. Now it sounds beautiful. Compared this unit with Arcam Alpha 9, Rotel 991, and the NAD Silbver Series. Only the Arcam came close but it didn't have the headroom I was looking for. For the $1050 I paid for an Oct. 1999 model from Shelly's Stereo there isn't a CD Player that compares with performance and price. Similar Products Used: Sunfire Vacuum Tube Preamp with Remote |
[Aug 29, 1998]
Scott Bayne
an Audiophile
I auditioned an AR CD2, Rega Planet, Marantz 63 SE, and Sony XA7ES in my system before I bought the Adcom 750. Through the RCA outputs the AR and Sony bested the Adcom in most areas except the top end. The Adcom's treble has always been open and airy in my system. The Rega and Marantz are a step below. But when I used the balanced outputs and ran it totally balanced through my preamp and amp the Adcom really came on. In my opinion, in balanced mode, the Adcom is better than the Sony from top to bottom. The Adcom doesn't quite equal the CD2 in sure musical enjoyment - the CD2 just seems "right" - its hard to explain. |