Wharfedale Diamond 7.2 Floorstanding Speakers
Wharfedale Diamond 7.2 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jan 31, 2000]
Jimmy Thomsen
Audiophile
Strength:
Great value for the money (120 pounds) and a very good sound, and you can use with every kind of music, and I also like the design
Weakness:
is that there is'nt any bi-amp or bi-wire funtion,but at this price it dosen't matters buy this speaker as fast as you can... Similar Products Used: i use Wharfedale 7.3 front speakers (they are also superp) |
[Aug 22, 2001]
Dan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price! Sound, stereo imaging.
Weakness:
Flimsy speaker grilles. England's legendary speaker is now made in China. At first I didn't like the sound AT ALL. Maybe it took 30 minutes for them to break in or maybe it just took my ears that long! Similar Products Used: Nothing this small (11 inches high). I have Pinnacle 8+ and Infinity SM-85's. |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Jefferson
Casual Listener
Strength:
nice trebel and midrange handling.
Weakness:
low wattage This was the first speaker I bought when I was just Similar Products Used: Onkyo TX-474 |
[Jul 28, 2001]
Steve
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
THESE ARE THE DIAMOND 8.2'S NOT 7.2'S. Highs are perfect, mids are perfect, looks perfect, made perfect!
Weakness:
Grill's are fragile but no problem. Wharfedales are nice, period. I had some $260 JL Audio 6.5 componets in my car that had 1" silk tweeters with ferrofluid and I loved them. Ive listen to all kinds of car audio stuff from Rockford, Polk, Infinity, ADS, OZ, Sony, MB Quart, Diamond Audio, etc and silks just rules. Metal, Al. and all that other stuff just sucks so I wanted some home speakers like my JL's and I found them. Similar Products Used: Listened to Pioneer, Polk, Boston, Cerwin, Bose, Velodyne, Sony etc, all inferior. |
[Sep 20, 2001]
Garett
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Looks (I got the rose finish), highs, mids
Weakness:
Grill is pretty meek Great deals at UBid...$65 for a pair ($80 shipped) Similar Products Used: auditioned klipsch, polk |
[Dec 03, 2001]
Justin
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price and Value, Home Theater
Weakness:
Analog recordings, Brass and wind instruments This is a follow up review. I have had a chance to burn the speakers in and give a more accurate review. Similar Products Used: Pioneers, JBL, Optimus |
[Dec 05, 2001]
Andrew Cizmar
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean full range sound, suprising low end, solid constuction, banana plugs, compact size, deal of the year
Weakness:
Cheesy grill, very directional, a bit bright I picked up these for the bedroom and, for price, these just can't be beat. I may eventually add an 8" sub to tighten up the low end, but they excel as bedroom or surround speakers. There has been much made about Wharfedales recent troubles (I think the company has been bought and sold several times over the past few years), but if my pair of 7.2's are any indication of the current quality trend, then I say the worst is well behind them. These are good little speakers. Similar Products Used: Infinity, Polk, Mission |
[Jan 17, 2002]
Chris Knoch
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Good bass for the size
Weakness:
Very, very poorly made. Diamond Anniversary Edition Similar Products Used: Polk, Boston, EMI, AR, Vision, Mesa, Pioneer, Optimus |
[Jan 03, 2002]
Travis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Generally clean, clear sound. Decent bass for size.
Weakness:
Highs can get a bit strident a high volumes. Lack of imaging. This review based on Diamond 7.1 Similar Products Used: PSB Alpha Mini, BIC rtr 43 in this size range. |
[Nov 12, 2001]
John Werner
Audiophile
Strength:
Looks, Nice Gold Bi-Wire Terminals, Low Diffraction Baffle, Large Silk Dome Tweeter, Better than average black vinyl covering on cabinet, Decent bass from small size speaker, Decent power handling for small size speaker
Weakness:
Can be over driven is asked to go to far beyond reason (can actually handle what I consider more than what is reasonable though considering...), Tweeter is not reticent, it obviously has extension but is not the smoothest (personally I prefer more as to not enough-so this is a decent trade-off), If cabinet was even heavier (thicker, denser, and heaver braced) I believe it could even sound better with same drivers. Everything I will say will be based on these being $100 speakers since most folks buy them for somewhere around that range...These speakers are a good real world example of how far computer modeling techniques have advanced loud speakers in the last two decades. The balance on these speakers is amazing at the price one can buy them at. They way out perform not only that, but also their quite diminutive size. When I exchanged these after using the Optimus LX'8's (lineam tweeter w/ 8" woofer) I was immediately struck with the bass. These speakers have more bass response than the larger LX-8's. That took me a while to adjust to since at first I thought it made the mid-range seem a bit receased. Soon I adjusted and perhaps also the speakers began the process of breaking in. In seemed that after listening more most everything was close to it's proper place. The mids became more there as I adjusted to the bass, the highs were very apparent though if the recording was on the strident side they revealed too much sizzle. This could be compensated for somewhat by the treble control and the axis one listened. Similar Products Used: I love clear highs so I've been using Radio Shack Optimus LX-5's and LX-8's due to Lineam tweeters. I have large planar and electrostatic speakers in other systems so I can have a good reference to compare mini-monitors to. |