Monitor Audio Silver 5 Floorstanding Speakers
Monitor Audio Silver 5 Floorstanding Speakers
[Jul 21, 2000]
Mark Wetherell
Audiophile
Strength:
Sound, Imaging, Clarity, Beautiful Finish
Weakness:
NONE!!! This was by far the best purchase I've made in months. I am so proud of my Monitor 5s, 3s, center 10, and the asw210 sub. They complete my home theater to the T. I've read some of the reviews posted on this forum and a lot of them were negative. I can't understand that!! The sound is absolutely amazing. The imaging is fantastic as well. I'm pretty sure I am past the break in period of 60 hours. Actually I know I am because every time I listen to them, I am again amazed by the clarity of the sound. Crystal. For example I just watched Sleep Hollow and the sound of the horse hoofs clapping throughout the whole film was amazing. Crystal!! What really impressed me was the quality of the finish. I went with the cherry and they look grand. Goes nice with the hard wood floors. So I wonder if you guys got a bad batch of Monitors. Mine rock and I highly recommend them!! I |
[Apr 15, 2000]
Yuri Zamazeev
Casual Listener
Strength:
Musical bass, neutral mids and very nice highs. Beautiful finish (cherry)
Weakness:
Still none Bought a month ago as recommended by local audio guys and reviwes from internet. Beautifully made, terrific finish ( I choose cherry). Sound just from the box was terrible (metallic and heavily distorted), but magically hour by hour they start to show everything I never heard from my CDs. What really amazed me - that is trully musical bass , very clean, very tight,very I would say mathematical. Santana's Supernatural excited me with magical bass and 80's guitar style. But if you like heavy and quick rock -those loudspeakers are not for you - sound a little distorted at mids and highs ( I can't listen to the Cure's Bloddflowers - may be disk was poorely mastered). |
[Apr 14, 2000]
Don Rale
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Image, tight bass, beautiful matched cabinets, dynamic
Weakness:
No real Low bass, but they're only 5 1/4" I hate to say "for the bucks". I'd rather say that these are really good at any price but at a grand, they're a steel. The cabinets are some of the best I've seen and the soundstage, depth and freq balance blew me away. Similar Products Used: Dyn, B&W |
[Apr 09, 2000]
Donny Davis
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Build quality, looks ....clear, precise imaging.
Weakness:
Need tweaks for optimum performance Just getting these broken in and I feel the 5i are beginning to show what they really can do. At first, a direct comparison had them far behind my old JBL's in depth, sound quality and strength. I have removed the tweet screens, mass loaded, raised them on stands to put the tweet at ear level and changed the placement several times. Then I bi-amped them. Yammy 2095 driving the tweets and Marantz ma500 driving the mids. I usually run these on large just to get them broken in. They are matched with the 31 (rears), center 10, and asw110 sub. This is a great setup with the 3i actually coming to life before the 5i. They are now equal to the JBL's on HT but are still behind in the music dept. They are much better than the Maggies, and about the same as the Energy RVS. I have read many great reviews on these and that's why I bought them. Now I just keep hoping I will be more impressed as the days go by. Similar Products Used: Energy, JBL, Magnepan |
[May 17, 2000]
lermanj
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Very accurate speakers with a large soundstage. Highs are very sweet, airy and extended, mid range is very full, lows are tight and tuneful with respectful output for a 5.5 driver. Detail, detail detail is amazing!!! Vocal reproduction is very smooth and realistic, and the cabinets are well built, and are very appealing.
Weakness:
Warning!!! This speakers are very sensative and sound very bright, flat, sibilant etc. with the wrong electronics. Receiver's will not "cut the mustard" for music. Not only do the electronics you're using have to be of good quality, but they have to be warm and laid back or these speakers WILL sound bright!!! That includes the CP source, pre-amp, amps, and cables. Bad recordings will sound bad because of this speakers incredible accuracy - may not suit everyone. I've lived with these speakers since November 99, ad it's taken me a long time to find the right electronics to complement them. At first, I was trying to achieve good sound with a Panasonic A120U DVD player for my CD source a Denon 3300 receiver, and lower end Monster Cable. After the 5i's broke in, they sounded better but I wasn't achieving the proper imaging, and they still sounded very flat, thin, with allot of brightness(they spike around 10khz) and extra sibilance in voices. There were numorous times I wanted to sell them but I heard from many people that the 5i's needed the proper electronics, so I decided to keep the speakers an upgrade the rest of my system. Similar Products Used: M&K, B&W, Def. Tech, Mirage and NHT. |
[Jan 08, 2001]
Hank
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Cute
Weakness:
Stumpy - low Bass High end equipment ?? |
[Mar 06, 2001]
Mike W
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Soundstage, detail, wood finish, overall sound quality for the price
Weakness:
If you like thumpy, boomy base, these speakers will not give it to you. While these speakers are a new purchase for me, and still technically in their "break-in" period, I am already enjoying what I think is a significant improvement over the Magneplanars (which are now up for sale on Ebay!). Vocals and mids/mid bass are so much more present with these than with the Maggies, and their ability to set a sound stage (which is why I love the Maggies so much) is second to none. I know folks who have paid quite a bit more money to get sound similar to what the Monitors can provide Similar Products Used: Magneplanar MG-10 |
[Mar 24, 2001]
Paul
Audiophile
Weakness:
The "Just Buy Them" aricle is pure hype. No value built into ownership by Monitor Audio. Poor support. Fit and finish is not as good as other products in same price category. Though I liked these speakers when I first auditioned them at my local dealer, I probably wouldn't have even considered them if it wasn't for the glowing article in Home Theater Magazine. Over time (I owned them for just over a year), the speakers wore on me. I found them boxey and somewhat hollow sounding and overly bright. I wasn't thrilled that one had to do all of the tweeks just to get them to sound good (and I tilted them, toed them in, filled them with sand and of course broke them in for a week). Don't get me wrong, they are nice speakers, just not worth the price. I sold the speakers and replaced them with the M&K S150THX system - WOW whatta difference!!! I really like Dynaudio and would have chosen them over M&K if I was a little more into music (vs. home theater). Similar Products Used: Dynaudio, M&K, older MB Quart, Hafler (remember those?), Thiel. |
[Oct 08, 1999]
Tony van Kessel
Audio Enthusiast
I recently shopped extensively for speakers, after doing a lot of research (audio, video & HT mags, internet searches). Then came the listening… |
[Oct 07, 1999]
Max
a Casual Listener
I love the detail and imaging of these speakers. They do take a long time to break in. In fact, when I first got them home I thought "Oh man, what happened?" because the broken in ones at the dealer sounded so much better. So, give em time. |