Cambridge Soundworks Ensemble II Floorstanding Speakers
Cambridge Soundworks Ensemble II Floorstanding Speakers
[Jan 19, 1999]
patrick lyons
an Audio Enthusiast
the hook up on the ensemble II is a bit unorthodox. the left and right speaker level wires (i know most of you know this, sorry) come in on a pair of binding posts (right pair//left pair) these SAME binding posts are used to travel to the smaller midrange-treble speakers. it was rather funny, this experienced stereo nut that i am, trying to figure out how to wire it up the first time. it was a clearance with chipped speakers and no manual. if i may brag 80.00 dollars too, which was dumb luck. anyway this "friction connection" or "pressure connection" being the only link for the sub and sat bothered me a fair deal. i heard what most of the people here (the slight detractors) were experiencing. so i tried some goofing around. if you imagine the right and left speaker wires coming off the amp and running to the proper posts on the sub. just 2 to 4 inches before the post connection on the sub, i soldered in the wires to the sats. what i wanted to do was let the frequencies go where they should go, well, more easily. i should say i am no engineer, or even a wanna be, so this is daydream guesswork. anyway, holly cole sounds legit. i believe there was a small increse in volume, (wanted or not, it sounds that way). anyone with input please jump in. it could be a neat tweak, or maybe not. when home ergonomics and sound and all else are considered, i would give it a 4. ps. it was the new ensemble II |
[Jan 27, 1999]
Rob Martin
an Audio Enthusiast
I have owned the CSW Ensemble II system for about 4 years now and they seemto sound better with age. The dimensions of my living room are 12.4' x 19'. |
[Jun 24, 1999]
J. Magary
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the Ensemble II system for 3 years and, more importantly, in 3 different apartments. I used to like them but now I have to get something new. Why? Well, they do produce high quality sound--clear, crisp, a little tinny (easily fixed with proper placement) and are well-built, but in a large room (as I have now) their balance dissappears fast, especially in the upper bass. I added a CSW powered sub which has improved my bass, but I'm still unsatisfied. ONLY BUY THESE SPEAKERS FOR USE IN A SMALL, REVERBERANT ROOM. In a large area, especially with carpets and other sound-absorbing objects/surfaces, they will leave you feeling hollow and distant. |
[Aug 03, 1999]
Tom
an Audio Enthusiast
I had Enseble IIs w/ the passive sub for about 6 years before also getting the Surround II 5.1 and CenterChannel II in Jan of this year. For a while, I figured they were good enough but after hearing speakers from Paradigm, NHT, B&W, M&K, Atlantic and Acoustic Energy (which I eventually will replace them all with), CSW came across as incredibly bright, tinny and very lacking in midrange tones. I use my system for about 70/30 in favor of music and after doing a side-by-side comparison last night, I couldn't believe the difference between the Ensembles and the AE Aegis Ones. No comparison. The AEs have alloy cones, are much beter built and cost LESS. While CSW do sound OK for small rooms, they are overpriced and can be easily beaten by the other brands listed above. |
[Apr 21, 1997]
Ken Clark
an Audio Enthusiast
I purchased the CSW Ensemble II system after auditioning a number of sub/sat systems including systems from Bose, JBL, and Polk Audio. I settled on the Ensemble II not because it was the least expensive system but because it sounded better than all of the other sub/sat systems I compared it to. |
[Oct 05, 1999]
Reg
an Audio Enthusiast
My friend owns these speakers and they are mediocre at best. The price range isn't too bad but I have to agree wholeheartedly with the last review about much better speakers being available at the same price point. These speakers would be OK for smaller appications like a small bedroom...maybe. (Even then, I would consider other options). I have to give an unenthusiastic 2 stars. |
[Jun 02, 2001]
AK S
Audiophile
Strength:
handsome, compact, good sound when compared to "bought-from-a-truck" quality speakers.
Weakness:
terrible sound when compared to true high fidelity mini-monitors in the same price range (NHT, PSB, Polk, Infinity, Paradigm, etc.) I agree so strongly with one of the reviewers below, that I'm going to quote him at length. I'd just add that the rave reviews below all appear to come from people who are upgrading from RadioShack-quality speakers, and have not yet heard the true high fidelity mini-monitors now available for a couple hundred dollars (such as NHT, PSB, Polk, Paradigm, etc.). For the same price, any such speaker will give you as much of a quantum leap over the Ensembles as the Ensembles gave you over your Pioneer or Radioshack speakers! |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Kent Wilson
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent midrange and open sound
Weakness:
Mediocre bass output...but considering size (small) and price (low) of sub-woofer its not bad. I purchased this system along with the CSW Center Channel Plus center speaker to use in my bedroom. I will use this setup equally for music as well as TV. Since the remodeling of my bedroom is not complete I have placed these speakers in my family room and using it as part of my Home Theatre System. I am using it with a Harmon Kardon AVR25 II receiver. This receiver is Pro-Logic only and puts out 65 watts per channel. Similar Products Used: None |
[Feb 18, 2001]
Milton Esquinaldo
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Small footprint, clarity of sound, price, excellent build and workmanship
Weakness:
system is very placement sensitive I always think it is funny to see reviews which compare a low cost speaker design to state of the art, audiophile speaker systems. Such reviews often compare (like in this example) a $250.00 system to one that costs thousands of dollars more. The reviewer will then assign maybe 1 star out of 5 to the product and declare it "junk." Absolutely hilarious! Similar Products Used: Bose 901's, Bose 601's, Klisph Heresey's, Klipsh Fortes, JBL Mini Monitors, Carver equipment |
[Aug 31, 2001]
Glenn M
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Size
Weakness:
Fatigue is fearce Was very excited about getting a higher end sat/sub line from Cambridge (I'd use the Ens. IV before). Unfortanately I was not overly impressed with this rig. The sub is larger and better, but of course passive. The sub isn't the problem though. Extreme fatigue (very harsh and tinny) when listened to at higher volumes. Weak in mid-base, and no deep base. Still, at $125 not a bad buy. If you want a pair of cheap speakers go with the Cambridge Model 17's or BIC 52 or 62 series. You can get those on line for around $75 a pair and they will produce a much better full range sound (down to the mid 50's response). Similar Products Used: Bose, Advent, Velodyne, Paradigm, Polk, etc... |