B&W DM 603 Floorstanding Speakers
B&W DM 603 Floorstanding Speakers
[May 15, 1999]
Simon Rainey
an Audiophile
I snapped up a pair of ex-demo 603s for £350 ($560) after auditioning them against far more expensive units including the B&W P5, Castle Howard and Mission 752. I'm impressed by the smooth and relatively extended bass together with a detailed top end and excellent overall balance. The stereo image is well focussed and the units seem nicely transparent. On the negative side, the sound is a tad rounded and a little warm, which isn't to everyone's taste, and the mid-range can become slighlty confused when the volume is cranked up. I listen to classical, adult rock and jazz in roughly equal measure and the 603s do justice to all three genres. They need space to breathe and must be kept well away from corners and the rear wall or else the bass just goes out of control - so they're no good for small rooms. I have them at least 4 feet from the side walls and 15 inches from the rear. And of course, be sure to biwire them. |
[May 16, 1999]
Orlando Sentmanat
an Audiophile
I've been using these loudspeakers for 3 years now, so I had the time to analize them, tweak them, and hear them with different equipment settings. My digital front end is the Parasound great inexpensive cd player cd/p 1000 amplified with Parasound solid state electronics. First of all, these babies care a lot for positioning. I'd played a lot with their placement finding that they are very sensitive to small changes in position. They give their best soundspace and imaging with very little toe in(I use 1/2" of toe in)and 8' center to center distance. Their sonic attributes are a large soundspace with very good imaging, good focus, adecuate depth, adecuate lack of coloration (a little moody), adecuate transparency, lack of bass definition and extention with some boominess and lack of timbral correctness in the lower frecuencies. After electronics break in period I haven't found the so commonly mentioned excees of brigtness and high frecuency harshness in the DM603. Midrange is balanced and liquid with good dispertion in this range. Their best attribute is a capacity to convey musical information in the right places in front of the speakers, specialy in the narrow sweet spot they create at 7' from the plane in front of the speakers. Euphonical rather than critical, they lack detail. Their lack of resolution makes it imposible for them to disapear even thoug they form a credible 3D presentation. Down again, very inadecuate low end, lacking detail, tightness and extention. There are better speakers in this price range, specialy the little costlier NHT 2.5i. Last note: a look inside leaves a lot to be desired in crossover construction, bracing, and wiring. |
[May 13, 1999]
Montree
an Audio Enthusiast
I'd just got my brand new DM603 for $1000 about 2 months ago. Together with my Sony recieverDA50ES and DVD player S7700,it provides clear, uncolored and very good image high and mid range sound even low bass but natural. After about 50 hours( or more) burning in this speakers, you will find James Taylor, Paul Simon or your other favorite musicians perform their music in front of you. |
[Feb 16, 1999]
marl
an Audio Enthusiast
While I'd like to consider myself an audiophile, i cant afford to be one, so i do the best I can with the resources I have. Maybe someday :). |
[Mar 10, 1999]
Laird Wilkie
an Audiophile
If your listening room is similar to mine (little carpet so somewhat bright) don't even consider this speaker. It's inherent brightness was intolerable in my listening environment. Almost anything sounded like exaggerated cymbals and tambourines with a bit of muddied music playing behind them. I think this brightness is mistaken by some for detail... I just found it tiring to listen to. The high end brightness might have been tolerable if there was good midrange or bass to offset it but I found these areas also lacking. John Lee Hooker's guitar was totally washed out and hidden in the midrange and the single 7" active driver couldn't produce accurate bass at anything beyond modest listening levels. Lower bass was just usless booming. Sure this isn't a expensive speaker but even at this price level I expected better. |
[Mar 10, 1999]
Kevin
an Audio Enthusiast
I auditioned this speaker. I thought for the price $1,000.00. it was one of the better speakers I listened to. Good highs and mids was the driving force in possibly purchasing these speakers. However, I was not overly impressed with the bass response, it was not tight enough for my taste. I eventually listened to th CDM7SE's and I was blown away. Needless to say these incredible speakers now sit in my living room. Oh, by the way, most audio stores I went to offered me 15% off of retail and 20% off of demo's. |
[Mar 04, 1999]
Brian Norris
an Audiophile
I've owned the DM603s for a few months now, and found that they do really well as long as music doesn't contain dense, layered electric guitar. Acoustic, jazz and electronic/techno is great! Vocals are outstanding and so is the big sounstage. They tend to sound a little muddy and bright, but they only cost a grand. |
[Oct 26, 1999]
Emil Prpic
Audio Enthusiast
Although I have serviced, installed, listened to, and enjoyed lots of different Hi-Fi equipment (and lots of different speakers by B&W, Kef, Pioneer, and, :( even Bose) I've never had a decent pair of speakers of my own (I emphasize a _PAIR_ because I prefer stereo rather than HT for music) simply because I've never had a proper room to put and listen to proper speakers in (and that's another point - it's pointless to assess speaker quality in an inadequate room/ambient - and, at least in my area, HiFi shops are all inadequate). |
[Dec 22, 1997]
Oscar
an Audio Enthusiast
Mmmmmm...These babies are soooooooooooooooooo good. The midrange is perfect. Bass is deep and powerful..Treble is airy and detailed.. Oh God what a speaker!! |
[Aug 24, 1999]
ponytail
an Audio Enthusiast
I've owned this pair of DM603 for 13 months.I can say "DM603 has a potential." through my exprience and several experiment in my living room. |