NAD C 340 Integrated Amplifiers
NAD C 340 Integrated Amplifiers
[Jun 03, 2000]
Howard
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Highly musical
Weakness:
A lot more money than the C-320 which sounds the same I had the privilage to review several NAD products when I was in London last August. I was able to hear both the C-340, and it's twin the C-320. They sounded very much alike, musical, smooth, easy to listen to, and sometimes seductive but after several hours I concluded that the less costly C-320 was actually the better integrated, and the clerk agreed. I was about to put down some Pounds Sterling, when the clerk told me NAD does not make a North American version of the C-320. When I got home I contacted the North American Dist, (Now the owners) of NAD and was told in so many words, if I didn't like their distribution chices, too bad. I find it offensive that the rest of the world has the choice to purchase any NAD product, we here in the USA have to take whatever they throw at us. Similar Products Used: NAD C-317, NAD 312, Musical Fidelity, Cambridge Audio |
[Apr 28, 2000]
Steve
Audiophile
Strength:
Huge Power, good bass output, great price
Weakness:
No power button on remote, only i set of speaker terminals on back pannal What I look for in a review is not the strengths of the product (anybody can always make up something good about it) but instead, i look for weaknesses; After all, I'm looking for reasons NOT to buy the product. Similar Products Used: Kenwood Ar301 (Awful) |
[Dec 12, 1999]
Chuck
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Clean,detailed sound; conservative power rating; price
Weakness:
No phono stage I have always enjoyed music as a hobby, whether it be collecting records, attending live performances, or banging around on a Fender bass or acoustic guitar, but for reasons unknown even to myself, it has been only over the last year that I becamed genuinely interested with the quality of my stereophonic system. After trading in my mass-market receiver, I bought this "B-stock" unit as my (like countless others from what I've read!) first foray into Hi-Fi(or is it "Mid-Fi"?), and I have never looked back! Similar Products Used: Rotel; Cambridge (both auditioned with the NAD) |
[Nov 01, 1999]
Daniel Wong
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Excellent for the price
Weakness:
Hmm...the volume control I was looking for an all-round budget amplifier and I was thrilled when I first listened to NAD C340. It was connected to a pair of Mission floorstanders and the result was excellent. Fluid vocal and deep bass, treble is natural and detailed without sounding harsh or bright, and excellent dynamics. I bought it immediately without much thinking since it was really cheap (I mean the price :>). |
[Dec 13, 2000]
brian
Casual Listener
Strength:
Everything
Weakness:
None Well, I actually have the C350 but seeing as that Audio Review doesn't list the C350 for review . . . I figured I would. Most retailers are pushing the C350 because the C340 is discontinued (although you can still find it around). The C350 is a little beefier with rated watts at 60 per (I think??). |
[Jan 31, 2001]
Gert Jan Klootwijk
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Deep detailed sound. Very much detail even when played softly. Although the unit has plenty of power it hasn't been designed for very loud listening.
Weakness:
It isn't a powerAmp. Perhaps I'm going to use the C-340 as a pre-amp and add a NAD Power Amp Does this Amp have any weakneses you might ask yourself. If you have any complaints, just spend more money. Similar Products Used: Rotel, Marantz, Denon |
[Mar 09, 2001]
Vlad Getchuroksoffe
Audiophile
Strength:
Demure Fascia.
Weakness:
High "haze" floor, textured and generally unexceptional top 2 octaves. Still breaking in, but a great transformation will be necessary to seperate the qualities of this humble integrated from the other flotsam available at your corner megalomart. No harmonic richness to speak of, all timbers are bleached out and overcast with haze and noise; The controls are hard to turn and feel poorly damped, The preout-powerin jumpers are a sound killer right out of the box. Lets give it a few days to "burn-in" and see what happens, but appears to be another unexceptional NAD product. Similar Products Used: Pioneer A3r, Rotel, Marantz Receivers, Cambridge ... |
[Jan 16, 2001]
Stephen Berger
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
warm and musical, rich and satisfying
Weakness:
Binding posts, volume control I will always be grateful to my C340. It's leaving tomorrow as I have sold it via ebay. Similar Products Used: none used but many auditioned |
[Feb 27, 2001]
Mark Bilinski
Audiophile
Strength:
Very well balanced, no trace of "transistor glare", great bass and very palpable midrange. Thanks to its high current output will drive the toughest loads.
Weakness:
Hard to find any even for twice the price. This is simply one amazing little amp! Personally, I think the C340 is NAD's greatest achievement so far. The sound is very well balanced and fluid. The mids are gorgeous and rich, treble is smooth and free from any glare that often plagues solid state gear. Bass has a good degree of "punch" and never seems to get out of control. |
[Jul 10, 2001]
Ryan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth power, dead silent stage, precise sound, attractive understated NAD design
Weakness:
Lack of precise control at low volume After doing research on the internet and in audio stores for over a month, I finally purchased what I considered to be an entry-level hifi system. After listening to many integrated amps, I chose the C 340. Similar Products Used: Denon, Arcam |