Yamaha RX-V995 A/V Receivers

Yamaha RX-V995 A/V Receivers 

DESCRIPTION

Dolby Pro Logic/Digital/DTS - Yamaha's Digital Sound Field Processing (recreates the acoustic personalities of actual concert halls and other venues), Cinema DSP, and Tri-Field Processing - 100w x 5 channels - 6-channel direct input - 5 composite A/V inputs - 1 s-video input - 3 analog audio inputs - 4 digital audio inputs

USER REVIEWS

Showing 251-260 of 338  
[May 12, 1999]
Joe
an Audio Enthusiast

I posted a eview on this unit a few months ago. That was when I owned a Sony s7000 dvd player. I soon after purchased the 7700 with dts. At first I enjoyed the unit as much as before, until I purchased my first DTS dvd The River Wild. The sound dropped out for about 1 second. I then returned the dvd and got another copy figuring that the disc was not compressed properly. Well when I got it home, it dropped out at the exact location as the last disc. When I went back to the store, they did not believe me because they said that they played the first one I returned and no drop out at all. I did not believe him so we went into the sound room and he played the disc in the same dvd player as I have. We sat down and he was right no drop out at all. I then noticed that he was playing the disc through the Denon 5700. When i asked him to swith it to the 995, all of the sudden, the drop out came back. Big problem. I have recieved numerous e-mails with people experiencing the same problems in the 795, 995, and the 2095, all of which have the same dts processor. When I spoke with Yamaha about this problem, they told me that it was a problem with DTS in their first generation discs, and that they would send me a newer DTS disc of my choice, well I picked Born On The Fourth Of July. Put it in, and guess what, It dropped out in two scenes. I called yamaha right away, and they pretty much told me to buy another brand. The store where I purchased the 995 has begun taking a lot of audio DTS discs off the shelf. The Yamaha tech told me that the reason the unit drops out is that it is soo sensitive and it picks up every little detail that it drops out. That makes no sense to me. The fact that they tried to bribe my problem away with giving me a new dvd instead of correcting the problem causes me to question this company. They are to busy passing the buck, blaming DTS, well why does the discs play fine in Sony, Denon, and B&K, are there processor inferior to yamaha, or is it the other way around. We the consumers have spent a lot of hard earned money into this product. Isn't 1000.00 enough money to get a piece of equipment that has at least functional parts in it? I guess not. Lets face it when most of us pay this kind of money for something, we EXPECT to get at least five years of enjoyment out of the product, even though by the time we get the product home, and hooked up, it is already "old technology". With this in mind, why invest money into something that just don't work right, or better yet, why give your money to a company that knowingly puts a product out that just doesn't work, and then does nothing about it but blames another company. this company is so bad that they could at least offered me a DTS dvd that they absolutely knew would not have dropped out. What a joke, for Yamaha that is, they are laughing all the way to the bank knowing they put outdated processors in all their units. Don't buy this on principle alone. The sound quality is pretty good, a little bright, but good. For sound a three and a half. For overall performance 0. Not even worth rating, the only reason I am in here right now is to let other potential consumers to be aware of the problem because Yamaha, and most of the stores that carry yamaha won't acknowledge the problem, and why would they, this unit is one of the hottest units on the market. they woud be dumb to ruin a good thing for them.

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
[May 12, 1999]
Peter
an Audio Enthusiast

I purchased this 995 a couple of months back and have loved every minute of it's use. It has a very good way of creating these wonderful soundfields. I too have tried the DTS river disc and experienced the same situation. As mentioned previously. I found that because the receiver has absolutely no way of knowing time lapse how could the receiver be at fault with a movie dropping out at the exact same spot every time. So I contacted DTS who did tell me that they had pressed some movies wrong and they would send me out some other movies. I don't believe Yamaha has anything to do with making or distributing movies. Anyways, the movies they sent me were fine. I did call Yamaha to bring it to their attention and they were aware that these wrongly pressed movies were only showing up with their DTS receivers because their DTS decoder chip was built to exact specifications. Which meant that if there is a flaw on a disc, even a small one, the chip is sensitive to the flaw. They also told me they are in complete contact with DTS and are trying to get DTS to resolve thier pressing problem. DTS also told me the same thing.I urge anyone and everyone interested in this receiver to please press forward and become another very happy user. Overall PROformance 5, customer satisfaction 5...YAMAHA ROCKS, you gotta love it!!!

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[May 13, 1999]
Iuri Kranert
an Audio Enthusiast

I have been shopping after a good receiver for quite a while. This is what I was looking for:On board DD and DTS, 6 channel input(future proof), amp out for all channels(when I move to a house I will use the receiver as a pre-amp connected to a more powerful external amplifier), good built quality, operation free of bugs, NO 360 degrees rotatory volume knob(that elimineted all DENONs). Soundwise I wanted it free of distortion when played loud, smooth high frequencys, clean treble and no hiss. All that for $ 1,000 dollars. Tried new receivers from HARMAN KARDON/ROTEL/SONY ES and YAMAHA. These were my findings:
1-HARMAM KARDON 65-Clean, Neutral and powerful, not intuitive to use and medium built quality(the front faceplate is made of plastic). Good remote. Passed due to the numerous bug problems reported on this site. Poor manual.
2-SONY 50 ES- Clean, powerful and smooth sound. Lousy remote and good built quality. However, not as quiet as YAMAHA 995. Worse: it has a hiss. Passed.
3-ROTEL 965- Smoother than all receivers tried. Quiet. Good built quality. Good remote. Liked a lot but it also has a history of bugs. Decided not to take a chance.
4-YAMAHA 995- Clean, neutral and powerful. Excellent built quality. No noise. Lousy remote. Fair manual.
Notice that I refuse to say which one is better. To say that receiver A is better than receiver B would be unfair. What works for me doesnt necessarily worksfor you. And vice-versa. I decided to keep the YAMAHA 995. Here is my report:
Upon firing this receiver, first thing that I noticed was the cleanness and power of the sound. Also, the amount of detail is staggering for a receiver at any price. Turning the volume knob all the way up showed no hiss. Nothing. Nada. This receiver sounded neutral with my system so I decided to smooth things out by connecting my sources with STRAIGHTWIRE CHORUS interconnectors(see my review). The CHORUS rolls off the treble a little bit, which I think is ok since the 995 lacks THX or other sort of cinema EQ in order to tame the brightness of some movies). Now the treble is more to what I like. I am able to crank the volume ALL the way up without distortion, so those who claim that this receiver distorts probaly have weak speakers. My DEFINITIVE BP-10s can handle 300 Watts, so they are able to keep up with the 995. Watching TOMORROW NEVER DIES on DVD is impressive. Voices sound natural, there are details galore and explosions shake the walls. On music, the 995 is quite impressive also. Sound is clear, musical instruments are all distintc, the imaging is good and the soundstage is fairly wide. The mids and highs excel for a receiver(I know that for a fact. I used to own ROTEL separates). DSP modes are actually fun to play with(love to listen to PINK FLOYD PULSE on CHURCH mode) and fully adjustable. Dont have a subwoofer and dont miss one(my system is in my bedroom). Enough digital inputs and S-video connections. On screen display. Good bass management. Very well built. Doesnt get hot.
Caveats: 1- Horrible remote control(I will be using a universal one). 2- No TAPE monitor(found on the 795 and his big brother the 2095). 3- Finding one(they are flying off the shelves).
My system:
DEFINITIVE BP-10 front speakers, tweeters firing at the sweet spot(I dont use a center channel), ROCK SOLID surrounds(mounted above me, on the sides, firing at each other), TOSHIBA 2108 DVD(see my review), 2 SONY VCRs, YAMAHA 550 EQ equalizer(review in progress), STRAIGHTWIRE CHORUS interconnectors, STRAIGHTWIRE RHAPSODY II 8'
speaker cable(bananas termination), POWER WEDGE AC fiter, CARDAS power cord(review in progress), AMC DAC-8 digital to analog converter(review in progress). The difference of price between the 995 and the 2095 doesnt justify buying the 2095(review NOT in progrss). The 2095 doesnt sound that different, but it is able to acommodate 2 front "effect" speakers.
I wil come back on this post after I try ALAN PARSONS ON THE AIR DTS CD on my receiver. 4 stars for now.


OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
[Feb 25, 2001]
Rick R
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Yamaha quality

Save yourself time and money, go to YourInsider.com to get it. I got one for $649. A great buy. I was going to get the 5280 but was able to get this one for what I thought I was gonna have to pay for the 5280.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 17, 2000]
Steve Welsh
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

ease of use, power, Sound fields

Weakness:

Remote

So far so good. I have had it for 1 week now purchased at Mt Pleasant Stereo in Toronto. From Elvis Martin. Good clean power. The sound fields Just disapear when you have selected the right one. Took about 15 minutes to hookup once
I had hoisted it up in the air. I wish the remote was up to the rest of this but learing it should be part of the fun. Now if only I can sve up to get the rest of the speakers..

Similar Products Used:

Yamaha R7

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 29, 1999]
gabe
an Audiophile

I bought my new Audi A6 a few months ago with a V6 - and let me tell you guys - for any of u looking for a good preformer and dont want to pay and arm and a leg -- get an audi ------
good luck

oh ...

Ok people I was at this site when it wasnt much of a site... its been a while cause i bought all my equipment with the help of all you people... now this Yamaha Unit - was superb -- I Found this to be the best which works very well with my Paridigm Monitor series.... 9's baby.. but guys u dont have to listen to us.. just go to a store and sit down and listen.. u wont be sorry ---- the remote is a bit annoying but god gave a brain - so learn - or buy a new remote $200 gets u a great one.. but i dont ahve it ..... I actually did buy the 795 for those of you not sure what to get... Well DOnt Get it cause the craftsmanship is less to be desired of. It has hardly any connectiions in the back -- and cheapo wire clips!! wire clips!!! yes wire clips not wire posts... I have thick wires and i i had to use this things - id snap them.. then id snap the f00cking unit in two. Now with movies is great... Music - wow! like u go to ur friends house listen to his shit stereo then u go to ur home - - DAMN!
Buy the 995 - and try going to a HOmetheater shop -- they know what there doing- goddamn WIz, Tops, 6th Ave. they just want you to buy whats needed to be sold - Good luck and please email me if u have any questions or comments.... thanks happy driving!!!

gabe

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Sep 23, 1999]
Gregg
an Audio Enthusiast




Product Review - Yamaha RX-V995 DD/DTS Receiver - August, 1999

Colin Miller



5.1 channel A/V receiver featuring Dolby Pro Logic, Dolby Digital, and DTS surround decoding in addition to DSP processing
5 channels rated at 100W RMS each, (8 Ohms) 20 Hz - 20 kHz, 0.07% THD

Features 5.1 channel input, preamplifier outputs for all channels

Size:17 1/8"W x 6 3/4" H x 15 3/8" D

Weight: 31 pounds (14.1 kg.)

MSRP: $999.95 USA


Yamaha Electronics, USA, 6660 Orangethorpe Avenue, Buena Park, California 90620; Web http://www.yamaha.com.

Chickens don’t ask for much. A little scratch to peck at, some water, a box to sleep in, a little companionship, and they’re set. Most humans aren’t so hearty. To motivate people into obtaining things necessary for the basic functions of life, our fundamental biology incorporates basic characteristics like hunger, thirst, and aversion to extreme climatic conditions. In those respects, we’re very much like chickens.

And yet - especially among audiophiles - there remains a perpetual longing, a striving for some abstract, elevated perfection. High-fidelity audio and/or video reproduction isn’t a necessity for life in any way, but it does provide a means to enrich it, allowing escape from, or expansion of, our sometimes mundane and occasionally uncomfortable world. The experience might soothe, exhilarate, and occasionally intrigue. Still, we may often idolize the means of the reproduction more than the reality of the original performance. Assembling an audio/video system can become as much an aesthetic or philosophical personal statement about oneself as a recreational vehicle.

As capitalist theory predicts, products accommodate our special needs. We have premium cabling, tweak accessories, and cosmetically/trend-derived gear, often rationalized by pseudo-scientific explanations that assuage our vanity while reassuring our sensibilities. Although most of this gear may actually improve the subjective performance, it seems to me that we often unintentionally magnify, or even generate, small increments of perceived performance to justify their purchase. This makes us feel that we have more discerning tastes than the masses.

I am as guilty as the next fellow. Littering my living room are shielded power cords, AC power purification/conditioning devices, silver conductor, Teflon-insulated interconnects, OFC multi-twisted pair speaker cables, and amplifiers that together have more capacity for AC draw from a wall socket than a large washing machine. I’d upgrade the entire run of Romex to 10 awg all the way back to the breaker box if I could, except that I still rent. Most of my excessive measures have technically valid performance advantages, however minor, and I do believe that their combined effects result in “better” sound. However, the aesthetic virtues of a nicely equipped, carefully integrated system can turn a few twinkles in the eye as well.

I enjoy rolling the solid rocker switches on the amplifiers to hear the large transformer "Boing" from slumber. The knobs on my passive controller, machined of solid aluminum and powder-coated white, provide satisfaction, presenting a very tangible sense of quality. The various cables dressed in nylon mesh, and neatly shrink-wrapped with gold-plated connectors do something for the whole concept or refinement and care throughout the system, my system, an expression of carefully selected craftsmanship.

And along comes a Yamaha RX-V995.

As a definitively mass market product, this Yammie has a big LED display, plastic knobs, a faceplate awkwardly expressing some kind of botched attempt at cosmopolitan, and LOTS of buttons! Compared to many other mass market products go, it’s not that gaudy. Next to the $399, loaded with every feature, Vegas Christmas Tree that not only looks cheesy, sounds pathetic, but lasts just long enough to catapult towards the city dump, the Yamaha RX-V995 looks virtually thoroughbred. At least every light and button does something occasionally useful. The build quality isn’t overly impressive, nor excessive, but at the same time leans an honest heft to a chassis with a fair deal of rigidity. Or, I could put it the way our editor would in his succinct way, and just say, "It looks nice as receivers go."

Connectors across the back incorporate not only 5.1 discrete analog inputs and preamplifier outputs (pre-puts), but also a bundle of source ins and outs. There’s S-Video, composite video, analog audio, and digital audio. Pretty much anything anyone could reasonably ask for in a receiver. Unlike the ultra high-end fare, the connectors aren't bullet-proof, so they won’t take kindly to indiscriminate yanking. Secrets’ own Yamaha RX-V990 fell victim to disconnected preamplifier outputs some time back, but that is because we are constantly plugging and unplugging things that we are testing. (We see our share of equipment come and go, and sometimes it doesn’t go easily.) The RX-V995 is a modest work of art, and the build quality as well as the design have no reason for shame. It’s what one should be able to expect for an upper line mass market receiver retailing for $999, minus a few bucks for the street price. With lots of inputs and outputs, as well as a turnkey solution to source selection, processing, and amplification, plus remote control, the term "suitable to task" fits perfectly.

The remote control itself is basic, wielding a door that hides DSP modes and setup functions, leaving bare source selection and basic transport functions. It offers learning capability and macros to boot. Airborne IR (infra red) macros are often unreliable, sometimes missing a crucial command in a chain, so I would suggest that, if you really want to do some serious automation, get an RF touch screen with a hardwired IR repeater system. Of course, this costs more by about a factor of ten, and some components won't always work with certain repeaters, but hey, talk to your salesman about that. The learning ability of the remote does not extend to the CD player, the Tuner or Tape function sections, which send out Yamaha IR codes. That bugged me a little, but there’s an extra button, indicated by a picture of a disc, which allows an extra “source” on the remote, where I stored my CD player functions. The transport buttons under the door are used to program the remote. When the door’s shut, the exposed unified transport buttons send the IR codes of the last selected source, while the master volume and mute buttons remain the same. I liked this arrangement, as it minimized finger labor on my part. Not an end all, by any means, but everything necessary for lounging is within the reach of a single thumb. My passive controller may be clean as can be with audio signals, but it makes me separate my behind from the cushions to change the volume.

Ironically, with all these features and DSP processing (useful if employed sparingly and carefully), there were some features I found lacking. Particularly, the processor setup does not allow time alignment for the rear channels, individually or together. This isn’t uncommon or absolutely critical, especially in the case of THX style dipolar surround speakers, in which case time-alignment becomes laughable. But, it would have helped to secure an optimum balance with direct-radiating rear channels.

Also, the receiver uses a fixed crossover setting of 90 Hz between the subwoofer (18 dB/octave) and speakers set as Small (12 dB/octave). It would have made me happier to have a standard THX crossover (80 Hz, 24 dB/octave low-pass and 12 dB/octave high-pass), and possibly multiple or adjustable configurations even lower in order to integrate larger floor-standing speakers while still benefiting from active bi-amping. However, the bass management does allow all bass to route to the front left and right channels, as well as the center or rears if need be, so that an outboard crossover (available with most powered subwoofers or as an option) could take care of the job.

Other than that, setup is pretty much like any other processor with Dolby Digital (DD) and DTS. Configure the bass management, and match levels between the channels. Compression circuits are available for night time listening, but the sacrifice in sound quality doesn’t make their use all that attractive. There is no subwoofer limiting level feature, which suits me just fine. Unfortunately, like other non-THX processors, there’s no test tone for the subwoofer. This would have been nice, but not a huge deal since most people futz with the subwoofer level after calibration anyway.

The RX-V995 did a great job as a digital front-end/preamp combo for plain vanilla stereo reproduction. Oh, sure, I’ll back peddle and excuse it for not approaching the likes of the better dedicated two-channel digital front-ends, or for that matter more esoteric surround processors that excel at two-channel reproduction by means of brute force, but those products also excel at thinning your wallet. The 995 performance certainly exceeded my own expectations, well enough that I let go of my purist passive controller fed by my CD player’s analog outputs in exchange for the remote control. A Lexicon, Proceed, Meridian, or Theta would make life easier, but I’ll survive in the meantime, and now I can afford the boneless chicken breasts. Hey, I’m tough that way }:>) I threw a lot of music through the digital input to line-level pre-out section of the RX-V995, and never shook my head in disappointment. Not too bad for a product aimed primarily at mass market home theater. I guess what I am saying here is that the Yamaha RX-V995 fits just fine into an audiophile's home.

The DSP modes available on the RX-V995 were alright, but they are really for use with lesser recordings, to provide some enhancement. An exception, not available on the RX-V995 or many other receivers is Yamaha's “Cellar Club” Jazz mode, which I first discovered on the DSP E-1000. Like Meridian’s Tri-Field, it’s not apparent that it’s doing anything until you turn it off, after which the subtly expanded sound field collapses. Yamaha DSP modes work by overlaying acoustics onto the listening environment. Meridian's Tri-Field, like other matrix steering techniques, directs sound around the listening environment based on inter-channel phase and magnitude relationships, coincidentally similar to how our auditory system "decodes" spatial information in stereo, often alleviating the detrimental "imaging" consequences of poor room acoustics. The Yamaha DSP modes, however, do not improve room acoustics, or overcome them, but simply add to them. With some material, it can fit quite well. Often though, if misused, it can prove more of a distraction than an enhancement, so be careful.

In movie use, the RX-V995 processing does very well. I watched “The Lion King” on VHS. Although the sound lacked clarity, likely due to poorly recorded VHS audio itself, the Pro Logic combined with the Digital Sound Field enhancement did a very good job with unobtrusive surround envelopment. I’m anxious for “The Lion King” to come out on DVD, but my daughter and I can shuffle through until then. The DVD “A Bug’s Life” had a picture and soundtrack that made watching cartoons exciting again. Super high recommendation for that film. Not high-fidelity, but hey - it's a movie. I used the video switching on the Yamaha, and it was pretty good. I was very disappointed, though, on the software side with “Babe.” Great movie, mediocre picture and mediocre sound. Any of you movie producers out there, take a hint and TURN DOWN THAT DATA COMPRESSION, YOU LOUTS! The picture was clearer on DVD than our VHS copy, but so were the motion artifacts, making my Trinitron look like a Plasma screen with a crummy scalar chip. Would you like some pixels with that side order of lima beans?

I ran a few DTS music discs through the unit, and it was pleasant, the best of which was the Alan Parson Project CD. All seemed fine, showing a tactful mastering of the disc. However, the Marvin Gaye and Pavarotti DTS CDs were downright insulting. Why not send EVERYTHING to the rear! It’s nice to offer DTS, and the sound quality certainly is generally better than AC-3, as a format, but there are really only a smattering of DTS movie titles, and often the quality of the soundtrack depends more on the mixing/mastering process than the encoding. With the promise of DVD dedicated audio formats, DTS isn't likely to take hold with much mainstream musical material, so I hope they can stick it out to make some headway with the film industry on the consumer front.

The RX-V995 A/V receiver actually works well as a receiver. The internal amps are no match for outboard power, but they are still quite adequate. A 10 kHz square wave test showed a moderately "slow" response, but a responsible lack of overshoot at the same time, indicating good phase stability at the upper end bandwidth limit. Compared to my reference (Aragon and Sunfire) amplifiers, the sound of the RX-V995's amplifier section varied, depending on the loudspeaker load. With the RBH surround setup, the receiver sounded a bit soft and muffled, while with the M&K THX Select system, it was very clear, but a tad hard with a slightly metallic aftertaste. Neither sounded bad, not painful or mushy, but demonstrated the potentially interactive relationship between speakers and the Yamaha's modest amplifier section. I imagine that most speakers found in chain stores, designed to accommodate the power supplies of mass market receivers, would work rather well with the RX-V995. If perchance the receiver recruited a meaty three-channel amp later on, the internal power supply need only worry about rear channel speakers, improving performance all the way around. Should an additional two-channel amplifier, or a five-channel amplifier come into the picture, the receiver goes on vacation, becoming a preamplifier with a relatively large power supply. Think of the internal amps as backup bonus features. Yamaha has been very smart to put pre-outs and pre-ins for all channels on most of their new receivers.

On a functional level, a product like the RX-V995 is almost perfect for me. The ergonomics of the front panel and learning remote are terrific, providing direct access to all basic operations. It also provides decent video switching, plenty of inputs, digital connections, Dolby Pro Logic, Dolby Digital, DTS, and 5.1 analog inputs as a back door for emerging formats (DVD Audio), as well as a Tuner that lets me catch morning radio shows or the classical music station to paint the background of my daily routine. The tone controls didn't have enough resolution in terms of frequency adjustment to be of much real use, but were a nice touch, and can be bypassed with a "direct" switch. I suppose component video switching would have been a nifty feather in the cap, were it offered. But, if I'd taken the time to run component video, I'd probably just run it straight to the television/projector anyway, so I can't see missing it much.

Overall, the RX-V995 represents an extremely fair value as a central hub of an audio/video system, either as an all in one solution, a dedicated processor/controller, or a starting point from the former to the latter. It may not have the pedigree of a dedicated preamplifier/processor, or look as nice, but at $1,000, a good receiver like this one might just be the best bet as a dedicated preamplifier/processor, or a starting point towards that end. Mass production, though not conducive to artistic craftsmanship, is extremely cost-effective. Fact is, large companies can sell a lot more receivers than preamps, and make them much cheaper because of it. The result may not be elegant, but it makes sense, and is a heck of a bang for the buck, much, much more so than the high performance products which are produced in small numbers.

Indeed, the Yamaha RX-V995 not only rises among the upper level of its mass market peers, but brings high performance down to earth. It's an attractive conversation piece and a bang up little black box. So reach up and grab one.











Colin Miller

For the Record, components used during review:

Aragon 8008BB Stereo Power Amplifier
Aragon 8008x3 Three-Channel Power Amplifier
Sunfire Stereo Power Amplifier
M&K THX Select 5.1 Loudspeaker System
Infinity Renaissance 90 Loudspeakers
RBH 5.1 Loudspeaker System
JVC XL-Z1050 CD player
Pioneer DV-414 DVD Player
Toshiba 2109 DVD Player
Bybee/Curl Prototype AC Purifiers & Power Cords
M'Dor Power Cord
DH Labs Silver Sonic Interconnects
AudioQuest Diamond Interconnects
Liberty Emerald 14-4 Speaker cable, custom-terminated.


© Copyright 1999 Secrets of Home Theater & High Fidelity
Return to Table of Contents for this Issue.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Sep 23, 1999]
Rudy
an Audio Enthusiast

I got a new Rxv-995 from good guys for $719. Could anyone believe this? It was $799, then the sales man gave me another $80 discount. The sound is really amazing. Since so many people compare the rxv995 and denon avr3300. Finally, I went to good guys and brought avr3300 home to compare with the 995. As result, I kept the rxv-995 and returned avr3300 in the next day after listening those two for a couple hours. Both are very nice and have clean sound. The avr3300 has a little bid better on the bass, but rxv995 has a little bid better on the treble. I invited a couple frinds of mine. Finally they have same opinion with
me. The treble on 995 is more soft and smooth than avr3300. Since I have the 200
watt's polk audio subwoofer. I am not worry about the bass. We listened music, movie. I gave 5 stars for rxv-995 and 4 for avr-3300.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Sep 21, 1999]
ERNESTO DURONTO
an Audio Enthusiast

I BOUGHT THE RECIVER FOR 899 IN PALM BEACH, FLORIDA.I WAS THINKING IN THE 795, BUT IT WAS OUT OF STOCK.
NO DOUBT ABOUT IT, A LUCKY DAY.
I HAVE NO WORDS TO DESCRIBE THE SOUND.YOU CAN DO ANYTHING YOU WANT, CREATING SOUND FIELDS, MAKINK YOUR ROOM SMALLER OR LARGER, FEELING THAT YOU ARE IN A CONCERT, OR IN A JAZZ CLUB.
THE POWER IS AMAZING, YOU CAN´T STAND MORE THAN HALF OF THE VOLUME MUCH TIME.
DON´T NEED TO SAY MORE. IF YOU HAVE THE MONEY I CAN´T IMAGINE A BETTER ELECCION.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Sep 21, 1999]
Tim
an Audio Enthusiast

IF YOU ARE IN THE MARKET FOR A DIGITAL RECEIVER YOU COULD NOT DO ANY BETTER THAN THE 995. I'VE HAD MINE FOR ABOUT A MONTH NOW,AND IT NEVER CEASES TO AMAZE ME.IT IS THE BEST SOUNDING PIECE OF GEAR I'VE EVER OWNED.IT'S RATED AT 100W,BUT I THINK THAT TO BE VERY CONSERVATIVE.FOR MUSIC IT IS VERY VERY CLEAN.FOR MOVIES IT IS UNBELIEVABLE.DOLBY DIGITAL AND DTS DVDS ARE SPECTACULAR.
MY SYSTEM:
RXV995
JVC 501BK
PARADIGM MONITOR 9'S
PARADIGM CC350 CENTER
KLH SUB SAT SURROUND

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
Showing 251-260 of 338  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com