Marantz SR-7000 A/V Receivers
Marantz SR-7000 A/V Receivers
[Dec 28, 1999]
Andy
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Remote; % channel Stereo; No Hiss or Hum; Multi Room/Source Audio and Video; 5 Dig ins, all assignable; Dig out; sleep timer; DD night mode;
Weakness:
No A/B main speakers; No seperate Subwoofer speaker outputs I purchased this unit last week. When I finally turned it on, later that night (setup was pretty easy), all I could say was WOW!. This system is great for music. In 2 channel direct mode or in 5 channel stereo (Denon is not the only one with this excellent DSP!) music comes to life. I cannot hear any hiss until I reach max volume (+14). Similar Products Used: Tested Denon 2700, Pioneer elite 24tx and 26 tx |
[Feb 15, 2001]
Rob
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Read Below
Weakness:
Read Below Great Product, absolutely the best bang for the buck! Similar Products Used: Marants SR580, Sony, Nakamichi |
[Jun 05, 2001]
Frank
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
As close to true as a component system...of course costing a lot less....
Weakness:
none This Reciever is the best thing out there....period. Similar Products Used: carver and adcom 2 channel components.... |
[Jun 05, 2001]
Mike
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
DD, DTS, 2 channel stereo. 5 dig I/P. 3 dig O/P Speaker setup, and options
Weakness:
Manual is poorly written With age this "beast" gets better. I could not justify paying the extra for the 8000 as the difference IMHO was really not noticiable. My system currently consists of the Marantz CD67SE (Modified with a new clock and O/P transistors as well as an isolated Opto-coupler from the rest of the circuitry). My newest addition is the Marantz DV18MKII (which in a side by side test with Toshiba progressive scan players beats them flat down and sounds - like a Marantz product should.) So far I have not encountered any problems with the unit. Also all of my Odeon speakers are rated @ 4 ohms so the unit tends to run a bit hot but, it never shut it self off or shown fatigue when playing complicated passages of music. All in all, for the money I paid for this Marantz product, I believe like many other reviewers here it is probably the best bang for the buck in todays market of mid-fi equipment. Similar Products Used: Marantz SR 5000,Marantz SR 8000, HK 7000. Denon 3300. And listened to a few Carver, Luxmann and Yamaha setups |
[Apr 26, 2001]
Jack
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Lots of power, great remote, looks great, easy to use, great for music and ht, good value, made in Japan (not China like Arcam!)
Weakness:
Heavy (due to good construction), may be too warm for some speakers (not mine) I auditioned every receiver in this price range (700-1000) and wound up purchasing this one. I really like the performance in 2 channel stereo. Especially with the Paradigm Reference 40's I have it paired with. Similar Products Used: Arcam AVR 1000, NAD, Onkyo, Dennon, Yamaha |
[Apr 25, 2001]
Mahi
Casual Listener
Strength:
"Because Music Matters"
Weakness:
None I LOVE THE WAY UNIT SOUNDS. DTS, DD EXCELLENT. Similar Products Used: NAKAMICHI, ONKYO. |
[Apr 28, 2001]
Brian Schick
Audiophile
Strength:
Great for music, solid construction, powerful, good "tube like" sound (not exactly but as close as I have heard from a receiver in this price range). Easy to operate. Japanese quality. Best warrantee in industry (3 years!)
Weakness:
No back lit remote, heavy, big I looked at everything out there for at least one year before making my purchase of this unit. I liked the Marantz 8000 but the price difference was too much for my budget. Similar Products Used: Arcam AVR 1000, Denon 3300 and 3801, Pioneer Elite, Onkyo, Sony ES, Yamaha, Marantz SR 8000 |
[Jun 09, 2001]
Tom
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Quality construction, power, music reproduction, multi room capability.
Weakness:
Manuel seems to be written like they assume you already know the terminology and have set one of these up before. I have only had this reciever a short time and so far have been real pleased with it. Very difficult decision as I had wavered between several different recievers. Onkyo 787, HK 500, Marantz SR8000, and the Outlaw 1050. In short form (not really) I chose the SR7000 because: Similar Products Used: Replaced a Yamaha 5150, Harmon Kardon AVR75 |
[May 17, 2001]
Tom Sullivan
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Alot of great reviews on warm music tones
Weakness:
Volume knob is old school. Everybody thinks there's no power. :) Actually I'm planning to buy a SR5000 or SR7000. Interesting someone said the 7000 screws up the bass for systems with a high end subwoofer? See SR5000, Lots of complaints for more power. I think the DB graduation has users confused. Starts off slow and picks up steam. lol Similar Products Used: Yamaha & Denon |
[Jan 13, 2001]
Leonid Knyshov
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Dolby Digital, DTS, Multi-room capability (haven't used yet), abundance of inputs, high quality of sound, pre-outs. Ahh you know them already ;-)
Weakness:
remote control not backlit. The RC1200, which is exactly the same, is backlit. I will call Marantz to see if anything can be done about that. Need to engage ATT mode manually. No ATT button on the receiver itself. No component video switching. Marantz has a VERY misleading website. Why am I saying so? Virtually all features they list for 14EX are available for the SR-7000!!! OK, so first just so you see what we are working with here and what my opinion is based on, the system: Similar Products Used: nothing in its class |