Snell Acoustics Type C Floorstanding Speakers

Snell Acoustics Type C Floorstanding Speakers 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-4 of 4  
[May 29, 2014]
Ernie
AudioPhile

I have owned my Snell C's about 3 years. I bought them used for 200 dollars. I have replaced the bases with solid maple and also replaced the woofers with genuine Snell replacements from Atomic HiFi. So, how do they sound? THERE IS NOTHING UNDER 10 GRAND THAT CAN TOUCH THEM.......F.....ING AMAZING!!!!

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 09, 2003]
KEN GAWLER
AudioPhile

Strength:

VERY GRACEFUL SO EASY TO LISTEN TO.THEY SIMPLY SOUND REAL! AND BEAUTIFULLY CONSRUCTED.

Weakness:

THE QUALITY OF THE PROGRAM MATERIAL IS ESSENTIAL. IS THIS A WEAKNESS?

I HAVE OWNED MY SNELL C SPEAKERS FOR 12 YEARS. THEY NEVER CEASE TO AMAZE ME. WITH THE RIGHT PROGRAM MATERIAL THET ARE OUTRAGEOUSLY IMPRESSIVE. THEY SEEM TO NEED ALOT OF SPACE TO REALLY COME ALIVE;AND I BELIEVE PROGRAM MATERIAL IS VERY IMPORTANT. THE PRICE PAID WAS A TERRIFIC BARGAIN CONSIDERING THESE SPEAKERS CAPABILITIES.I COULD NEVER IMAGINE MY LISTENING ROOM WITHOUT THEM!

Similar Products Used:

EV INTERFACE

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 04, 2000]
Terry Roth
Audiophile

Strength:

Deep and accurate bass, exceptional balance and smmothness

Weakness:

Lacking the highest resolution. Need LOTs of power

I have had the Snell type C's for more than 10 years, and have never felt I needed to upgrade. Had big Magneplanars before them, and could not live with the too-tightly focused sweet spot. (Used the Maggies with the big bass panels, but the room was a little small (12x18) for them). I drive the Snells with an Amber 70 amp from a PS Audio 4.5. The Amber puts a little over 100 watts into the speakers, which is on the shy side for concert volume with full orchestra/chorus, but more than adequate for chamber music and jazz. I suppose I could look for an amp with more power, but the Amber is a very lovely-sounding solid-state amp, albeit there is a tiny bit of hum present which is masked by music at regular listening level.


The sound is extremely well balanced, from about 30 hz to 15khz or so (at 57 I no longer hear much above that), and the soundstage has a decent front-to-back spread, and better than average width. The Snells are not very sensitive, tho. I had to have the bass (10 inch) driver on one speaker re-coned (the foam surround was disintegrating) and one of the 4inch midrange drivers failed after 7 years.

I paid about 1800 for these back in the last 1980's, and they have been worth every penny. I have never bi-amped, but bi-wire with Monster and Kimber cables (Monster for bass, Kimber for treble drivers)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Dec 31, 1999]
S
Audiophile

Strength:

Imaging, Bass Power, Sheer nock your socks off sound.

Weakness:

Needs a large room

I love my Snell C-IV's, great bang for the buck. They do need a large room which I have and pleanty of power. Two Hundred Watts minimum, the more the better. Biamping also helped the sound a bit. I did turn off the rear tweeter, my room was is bit bright.

Similar Products Used:

NHT, B&W, Martin Logan

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 1-4 of 4  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com