Bose 901 Series VI Floorstanding Speakers
Bose 901 Series VI Floorstanding Speakers
[Nov 29, 2000]
Jim
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Make good fire wood.
Weakness:
See review. Having heard that the 901 Series VI was the Bose ‘Flagship’ speaker, I wanted to give these speakers a try. After all, Bose must have surely invested some effort into making a decent loudspeaker if they go to all the trouble to label it as their ‘Flagship’. Similar Products Used: An insult to list other products in this space. |
[Mar 10, 2001]
Ken
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Room filling sound, retro looks, great customer service
Weakness:
overpriced, poor imaging, smeared soundstage, finicky placement, poor build quality, strained treble I can only think of a couple of situations where these speakers would be appropriate...a bar or a dance studio. Anywhere where the listener is not concerned with a soundstage or proper imaging. Background music is all these speakers are fit for. The series six are my second set of Bose 901's having had a set of series III which I bought from e-Bay, so I have some experience with them. With both of these sets, I was using a mediocre Yamaha integrated amp and at the time I thought they sounded good. That is, until I started learning about what a true stereo signal is supposed to sound like. I decided to upgrade my equipment to mid-fi. It then became glaring apparent that Bose 901's are truly lousy speakers. Weaknesses as I see them: Similar Products Used: Kloss Original Large Advent, Bose 501, Bose 901 III, currently B&W DM602 S2 |
[Jan 30, 2001]
Superman
Audiophile
Strength:
Faster than a speeding bullet, more powerful than a locomotive
Weakness:
Kryptonite Hey Stephen, let me tell ya something: Bose isn't very good. At all. They're not bad speakers if you cut the price by 75%, but for this outrageous sum of money, they're just not worth it. Bose uses extremely cheap parts. They spend all their money on advertising (often misleading I might add) and keep saying how they're innovators and how they're speakers are great. Just because they repeat the same thing over and over doesn't mean it's true. |
[Jan 30, 2001]
Stephen
Audiophile
As I said before, LISTEN to the speakers, not the reviews--and that's true of ANY speaker. People are too subjective when selecting speakers, and everyone has their own idea of what "sounds good." I do look for comments that reoccur consistently like "shrill highs" or "boomy bass" but only if 85% or more of the post mention it. If you really think you've got superman hearing--go get tested--you may be surprised with the results. Look at the the dB level required before you could hear a given frequency--that tells you the true tale. Hearing tests show the Frequency and dB level required before you could hear it. I guarantee that the vast majority of people (especially men) over 30 cannot hear above 15kHz without pushing dB levels to over 90dB. |
[Aug 31, 2001]
Jose~
Audiophile
Strength:
Most respected speaker designed by an Indian fellow
Weakness:
Indian fellow was tone deaf The 901's are supposed to be the greatest speaker reguardless of price. Well why are there more expensive speakers out there? Why do stores sell other speakers as well? Nothing is the best, if they tell you that they are lying. Something is always better. With that in mind, expect a smeared midrange, followed by sloppy bass, with rusty tuna can lid sharp highs. That is all for the forcast kiddies. Similar Products Used: Shaving cream, socks from 400 oak street |
[Dec 20, 2000]
stuart scott
Audiophile
Strength:
exceptionaly smooth powerful base able to display a wide dynamic range
Weakness:
tricky set up intelagent user required I would like to start this review buy doing an A-B compairson 901 series VI & altec stonehenge I the altec's are flore standing speakers over 100 pounds from the same time period costing $1000 in & around 1974 I beleave thease altec speakers would rate class A today for desien & sound. fist off I was amaysed how thease 901 speakers held up to the big altec's the smooth powerful base not only matched the altec's but out performed them truly amaysing for there dementions how could a 32 pound speaker pull this off ? god knows it must be bose!! when it came to midrange smoothness the gap tightend with surprisingly close results voices sounded superb on both seystems the bose a tad more newtral the altec's a tad forword sounding however when it came to the highs the altecs had the uper hand while the bose highs were exstreamly smooth sounding the altecs were a tad more open the cyembels sound awsume on the altecs so if thease bose 901 speakers can reach this level of performence its behond me how on gods green earth they could get negative reviews it has to be set up ! they do require an intelagent user but surely not that diffacult come on guys read your manuals & get it together hook thease babies up to your amp the corect way place them two feet or so from the back wall & your 901s will be reborn & have you wondering how you gave thease superb speakers sutch a unjust review I love mine & thats striat from the horses mouth heha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Similar Products Used: maggies |
[Oct 08, 1997]
Christopher
an Audio Enthusiast
In the seventies I listened to a friend's 901's...They were positioned away fromthe back wall (@3-4') , they were played Loud...I was not impressed. What they |
[Nov 14, 1997]
Chris
an Audio Enthusiast
John, please demnonstrate on the technical talk board that Bose is three times ahead of other speaker manufacturers. My opinion is that bose develops innovative product concepts. These concepts are irrelevant to the sound reproduction quality, but are relevant to people's lifestyle and desire "to keep up with the Jone's who just got some bose...". You can debate on this for ever. However, there is one thing you cannot debate on: It's about the quality of the components chosen to build bose speakers. Take one bose apart, and compare it to another brand similarly priced. You will recognize that bose is stilling your money. But who is going to take a bose apart? No one, and bose buyers are not seeking the absolute best sound reproduction system, and bose buyers do not get involve in long, structured, educated decision making process when choosing a system. It's more an hedonic pulsion just like a kid who sees a candy in the store; he has to have it. That's why they keep advertising and selling very well a poor product (poor from a technical/physics/audiophile viewpoint).But anyway. Show us on the technical board that bose is three times ahaid of the other speaker manufacturers... |
[Nov 14, 1997]
Mike Steeves
an Audiophile
Quoted from John below, "No One's adveritising is good enough to sustain a poor product for any length of time. "- |
[Nov 12, 1997]
Timothy
an Audio Enthusiast
This is a comment to Bose, not to the unfortunate people who bought from them: |