Bose 601 Floorstanding Speakers
Bose 601 Floorstanding Speakers
[Aug 25, 2001]
Tim
Casual Listener
Strength:
buying them used,they are ok
Weakness:
not very good sound I bought them used back in 1989--they were 1977 models--at least the cabinets were rock solid as all speakers had back in those days.I kept the 601's for 5 years and they served me well in that time--it was all I could afford back then.It would not be fair to Bose for me to compare them to what I currently own,however,I would tell anyone to look elsewhere instead of buying these new or whatever similar model Bose is offering now.If bose would possibly upgrade from paper cone tweeters and upgrade the crossover network I would imagine this would be a resolution to the 601's muffled sound.If you buy them used on E-BAY--then, I would recommend them for the under $200 bids,but, I would not recommend one to purchase them new.Many other brands in the same price range offer better sound and better grade components these days due to Bose still staying behind the times on this particular model.My ratings for them is applying to the speakers as a new product overall and not used ! I listened to the 501's new about a year ago and was not impressed either considering the price and this was similar to the 601 model Similar Products Used: jbl,klipsch,paradigm |
[Jan 15, 2001]
alvin cruz
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Open detail warm highs. Clear, smooth deep bass. High power handling.
Weakness:
They are not made anymore by BOSE. I'm the second owner of this unit bought through the news papers ads. I'm really searching for this speakers for he reasons that this was the best speakers that Bose have ever made. My father owns a Bose 501 series4, the bulky 501s not the new series. I've heard so many speakers from the british speakers (B&W, Celestion, Mission, Rogers, Tannoys etc.), Canadian speakers (PSB, Paradigm, Energy, NHT etc.) to the American speakers (JBL, AR, Infinity, Polk Audio etc.) so I know how they sounds but i've always comeback to the sound of Bose 601s. I think that it is a matter of taste and an objective opinion. I know that the 601s are not the best in the world of speakers, but I think it is one of the listenable speakers IMHO. Anyway I'm not an audiophile since they don't usually consider economic reasons(spending thousands of dollars on cables only). I'm just bug by the person who intentionally posted one star just to lower the rating of this model which I think is not right for an objective review. So to make this review balance, I will post this again. |
[Mar 05, 2001]
Al Simmons
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Sound qualitiy
Weakness:
Can't get the positioning just right I'm a big Bose fan, because I like Bose. They're great. I went to their website and learned a lot about this company. Here's some general info about these fine speakers: |
[Mar 27, 2001]
Spaceman Spiff
Audiophile
Strength:
20 years of non-audiophile fans inflating them to be gods greatest creation.
Weakness:
"Back when bose built with quality"... A scandelous comment indeed; as if anyone here has a clear grip on exactly when and why bose turneed into a "rape stupid people out of their hard earned money factory". I truely dont think it was any different 20 years ago than it is now, bose had an inferior product that was supported by those ignorant background music fans who felt no need to put forth the effort to try and find anything better. 20 years ago B&W existed, and a pair of B&W DM 640s was waiting to prove the pathetic Bose 601s for the garbage that they where, but no one wanted to listen. Complacency is ultimately the fate of the Bose fan, to settle with a purchase and then, unfortunatly, learn that something far better can be had for the same or less money. Than they retort to negative comments angrily, blabbering things like "they sound good and thats all that counts". Hardwear inevitably makes up for any machines capabilities. If it was proven, beyond the shadow of a doubt, that a given specimen implemented shoddy craftsmanship and parts(hardwear) ; and you where even slightly in touch with reality, would someone saying " its just good" mean anything to you? That is essentially all bose fans ever say. To be frank, " the bose 601s are far better than the Martin Logan Statement, even if I could get them both for the same $$$$" being uttered in here would not suprise me a bit. To conclude my rantings, the 601s can be beat by ANY speaker from ANY time period of the same price, as long as there are people with brains participating in the search. Similar Products Used: B&W Matrix 803. |
[Mar 26, 2001]
Andrei Tarkovsky
Casual Listener
My friend Sergei had purchased these speakers when they were still in production. I went over and checked them out. I'm not really that knowledeable when it comes to audio equipment. Despite this, I knew that Bose was a respectable name in audio equipment. |
[Mar 26, 2001]
John
Audiophile
Strength:
very dependable! Quality sound!
Weakness:
None...... If you're in touch with reality! I have two pairs of the Bose 601 III I would buy many more If I had room for them! They are quite old, but they have excellent sound quality, and tons of bass! |
[Aug 12, 2001]
Ian Choudhury
Casual Listener
My first hi-fi purchase after graduating from university was a pair of new 601 II (cost A$1850) - that was way back in 1986 and I have not had a problem with them for the past 15 years. The sound quality is still like the first day I brought them - very good. The only problem is they are beginning to look old. |
[Aug 16, 2001]
Alan
Audiophile
Strength:
None (seriously)
Weakness:
Muddy overall sound. Overpriced. This is a follow-up to the agree with the comments Kevin stated below. Let me fill you in... Similar Products Used: You name it! |
[Nov 18, 2001]
willy wonka
Audiophile
Strength:
everything, they are perfect
Weakness:
what.....nothing! bose speakers are the best in the worald period Similar Products Used: most everything |
[Jan 06, 2002]
Anonymous Joe
Casual Listener
Strength:
Great Dispersion for big room, equal sensitivity across the whole freq range. I hear parts of the sound in my CD's that I just can't hear when using my other stereo's (and I *DON'T* mean noise, I mean the mid range sounds in the CD)
Weakness:
upon close inspection the cabinets on these speakers looks a little cheap, we'll see how the hold up over time. First off, let me say that I am not a big techie audiophile. However I am very technically oriented and spent several hours reading about speaker specs and technologies at several web sites. I think that speakers are largely a matter of personal taste in sound. Some people like light clear highs and other people like boomy bass. Me, I seem to like being able to hear all the music at medium volume/power levels and being able to distinguish the differences between bass notes. Although I am not a Classical Music nut, I do have dozens of Classical CD's and often leave them in the CD changer playing on shuffle. Similar Products Used: I have a pair of 1993 Bose 301 bookshelf speakers that are about 10 years old and they sound great for their size. I have a $900 SONY Home Theater system with an active Subwoofer a 3 driver center channel and 4 satellites, I also have a $200 Aiwa office stereo. |