Nakamichi LX-3 Tape Decks

Nakamichi LX-3 Tape Decks 

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 13  
[May 20, 2016]
Richard Hebert
AudioPhile

This is the best quality cassette player that I have been using with my McIntosh Integrated Amplifier MA6200.
You will certainly enjoy how pure the sound come out of this machine if this is combined with an high performance amplifier.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Apr 11, 2003]
AudioPhile

Strength:

INCREDIBLE top to bottom cohesiveness! Tape handling is top notch. Auto fader is a great idea! Great asthetics (nice having the lesser used controls behind the swing down door)!

Weakness:

Azimuth adjustment is SERIOUSLY finicky, as there are two screws to adjust rather than the "cheap" decks with one little tiny screw. Rather bulky by comparison to todays machines!

When I recently hooked back up with a high school friend/musician, he mentioned that someone had given him a tape machine and would I like to check it out? I said sure, went over to his place and saw this "Nak" sitting there in his closet! I offered him soem coin for it, he accepted and I took it home. Well, the drive belts were worn to death, the fast forward and rewind had tons of slipping to them, and to make matters worse, the deck would not go OUT of record mode. My technician friend had me bring the deck into his shop, where he proceded to teach me EVERYTHING about the transport mechs. on this deck! We got it working like new within 3 hours (and $3.00 for two new belts!). Even thought I've only had the deck for three days now, I can not believe how pure and clean the sound is, regardless of how it is set up (no NR, Dolby B, or C)! I sounds killer and makes me wonder why tape died (or is still dying) its slow death (personally, I think its the lack of GOOD machines like this!). From top to bottom, this deck gets almost everything right! Sure, you can still over cook (read: distort) the tape if levels are too high, but thats a small price to pay for something that gets vinyl AND CD down like a mirror image. My wife thought I was actually playing a record when she came home yesterday! I really FOOLED HER!!! I think I'll keep it!

Similar Products Used:

System- Precision Fidelity C-8a preamp Crown PL-3 and Mission (CyrusII) power amps Linn Axis Turntable w/ Linn Akito II arm and Audio Technica OC 9 ML MC cartridge. Denon DCM-370 CD changer Dahq

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 10, 2002]
elkcub
AudioPhile

Strength:

Fantastic sound quality that rivals vinyl. Easy to use feather touch controls. Very stylish period of yesteryear.

Weakness:

None found.

Wow, was I ever smart to buy this unit. I''ve been using an entry-level Nak BX-100 (gear modified) for the last 15 years, but this older, classic, LX-3 is much more refined. In fact, it produces something very close to the warm sound of vinyl (Thorens, Grace, VPI cleaner), absent apprehensions of random buzzes and pops. I imagine that the improvement over the BX-100 is in the playback heads, but perhaps the precision of a dual capstan tape-feed plays a role. In any case, the musical sound is superb, and I''ve now gone through evey cassette in my collection with renewed enjoyment. Although I have not used tape recording features much in the past, I''m going to be experimenting with it again, using the 20 db Dolby C noise reduction this machine has. Although not as readily found as the newer BX series Naks, my advise to the serious audiophile is to buy one of these remarkable LX units if one is available in good condition.

Similar Products Used:

Nakamichi BX-100

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jan 19, 2000]
jwg
Audiophile

Strength:

Great analog sound

I've had problems with my deck since I purchased it in 1984. It needs some serious repair now adn I'm looking for someone who can fix it.
It makes great tapes, for itself, virtually indistinguishable from source when properly biased for quality tape.
Overall the only gear I have left from my 1984 stereo. I'd buy it again, even with all the problems.
I must be crazy. The thing's been a recurring maintenance nightmare and I'll still give it five. I must have purchased the proverbial lemon!
So completely trounces the new JVC thing I bought that I won't get into any more detail.

Similar Products Used:

JVC three head thing

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 17, 2001]
George
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Agree with EVERYTHING previous reviewer stated!

Weakness:

None

Well my good man, you paid for the LX-3, the same amount I paid for my 581Z. $10, MINT condition. Original box, and owners manual. Purchased at the Officers Wives Club Thrift Shop at McGuire Air Force Base. I can't help but think the husband and wife were getting divorced, he was out of the country, and SHE brought it in for sale. MY good fortune, is HIS tough luck.

As far as the LX-3, somebody left one ON MY DESK. Mint condition, absolutely free. I love this country.

Same day I got the 581z, I picked up a vintage 90wpc Sansui rcvr, at the same thrift shop, from the same owner. If it IS a divorce sale, he probably killed that woman. Sold the Sansui THAT afternoon for $125. original box, owners manual, and not a scratch on it.

Similar Products Used:

Nakamichi 581Z

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Dec 10, 2001]
Claudia Jansen-Dortmans
Casual Listener

Strength:

So musical...

Weakness:

none

In 2Q I bought it on the web - a true second hand, flew it from Europe to the UK, switched it on and since then it has worked flawless. It did not come with a manual, but you do not need that at all.

I feel that - similar to vinyl - it sounds more natural than most CD's or digital radio let alone any compressed/decompressed way of reproducing sound. For the techies among us, yes I am using Dolby B only.

Please note that I am neither pro nor against analogue or digital so please do not send any e-mails to start a dialogue.

May be when you grew up with live music, vinyl and cassette, it strikes you every time you hear that non-digital sound. Emotional? Perhaps, isn't that what music is all about too...?

Similar Products Used:

Sony TC-FX5, Denon DR-M1

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 18, 2001]
Dan Johnson
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Unmatched sound. About as good as you can get with a cassette machine. Dolby tracking is excellent.

Weakness:

Meter is rather coarse for such an expensive deck. Would like more segments, or at least different color for over 0 dB.

Believe it - or not - I bought this for $10 at a Goodwill store. It was in about 95% condition. It was missing a cassette door but I made one out of acrylic that actually looks better than the stock one. After a good cleaning and a new door, it's now 100%. I was originally going to sell it but realised I would be stupid to do so!

This machine sounds better than any two-head machine I have ever heard - beating my old NAD by a whisker. It has dual-capstan drive and will play some tapes that I had given up for dead.

The way the head is designed, it is almost impossible for the head to have azimuth error. It uses a cage affair that pushes back the tapes pressure pad. Tension is maintained using the dual-capstan drive. Wow and flutter is extremely low. Frequency response is to 20K with all types of tapes. Dolby tracking is exceptionally good, especially with Dolby "C".

The reason so many tapes recorded on a good NAK sound "bad" when played back on other brands is because the alignment of NAK heads is so much better than on most other brands. The old myth that they use smaller track width than other brands is not true - there is a standard that must be met because of licensing requirement with Philips. If a tape made on a NAK sounds bad on your deck - check your deck - the heads are probably out of alignment!

One of the best cassette machines ever made, surpassed (by a tiny fraction) only by a few other NAKs and equalled by very few.

Similar Products Used:

KENWOOD KX1080 3-head cassette (excellent) FISHER CR4029 3-head cassette deck (don't laugh, it's better than about 97% of the stuff out there!)

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 24, 2000]
Roman Picnic
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Great design and superior sound quality

Weakness:

You really need good tapes (MAXEL MX-S)

I recently bought a Nakamichi LX-3. I've wanted this machine since i was only a little boy. My uncle had a LX-5 and i still remember the amazing sound quality. I bought this machine for 500 guilders(approx. 250$), and i think it's a bargain since this machine is, or definitely will be a collectors-item. They don't make them like this anymore and that's a pity because it records much better than the most digital devices. Even 96kHz won't do the trick and i am starting to believe that analoge rules, when warmth and depth are important to you. The LX-3 is the best recorder ever made i believe. When you have the chance to buy a NAK, especially the LX-series, don't hesitate.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Sep 30, 1999]
Alex
an Audiophile

The LX-3 is one of the rare 2-head tapedeck with a dual-capstan mechanisme.This deck has the same high-quality tape-transport as the more expensive ZX-line form Nakamichi.
Dolby adjustmant is top-quality.
Payed 15 years ago about 1600 guilders, today it does about 800 guilders...
A also have some old Teac and Pioneer decks from the same Age, they both have mechanical problems, and they never perform 100%, while the Nak is still in top-shape.
I only have replace 1 rubber string, i'v got it for free from the import-company Trantec in Rotterdam.
Top-quality !!! 5-speaker rating !!!

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
[Sep 30, 1999]
Jan Evertse
an Audio Enthusiast

LX-3 is absolute top in 2-head tape-decks.great design, good build machine still 100% after 15 years
collectors item
great sound


OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
Showing 1-10 of 13  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com