Cambridge Audio D500 CD Players
Cambridge Audio D500 CD Players
[Apr 20, 2001]
Kyle
Audiophile
Strength:
liquid mids and highs, controlled bass, no fatigue
Weakness:
none, for what i can afford this is the best i have heard this cd player is great. i listen to a lot of 60's jazz and i have never been so involved in the music. the upper range on this player is so detailed it's amazing. it does take a second when you put in a new disc for the crystal dac's to kick in, but this is a small price to pay for great sound. i love it! there is probably something better, but for a lot more money. Similar Products Used: onkyo,nad,rotel |
[Apr 05, 2001]
Steve
Audiophile
Post burn-in observations; After about 32 hrs of burn-in the unit sounds fantastic. Tight, controlled bass, smooth highs and detailed mid-range. Track access time and player start-up seems normal and the transport is quiet (some had complaints about these aspects). The good news is, this player looks much better in real life than in photos--its appearance in photos had me imagining a big piece of plastic, but it is in fact solid, heavy and well built. It's reminiscient of Nakamichi OMS series players; form follows function. My only complaint (and a minor one) is the display--as others had mentioned. It's difficult to see beyond 5 or 6 feet; but this is a minor quibble. I can see why HI-FI gave it "best player under $1000" accolades. |
[Mar 08, 2001]
blank blank
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
value, value, value
Weakness:
not many for the price This review is for the SE edition of the D500. I use it with a Musical Fidelity A3 integrated amp and Paradigm Studio/20 V2 speakers. So the D500 is the cheapest part of my modest system. I took a gamble hoping that it would be able to hold its own (gotta love that 30-day return policy at audio advisor) and it paid off. This is a great player for its price. Very good tonal quality and imaging. It took a week or so to really come around, and even after a month I was still noticing subtle improvements. |
[Mar 08, 2001]
grewper
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
sonic detail, looks (silver faceplate), simplicity of design
Weakness:
on the bright side of neutral, noisy transport, somewhat slow cue time I think that "blank blank" sums up this player quite well. I initially purchased the D500SE model in order to save a few bucks, but wound up returning it a short time later. The slight emphasis on brightness in the high frequencies and "sibilance" in vocal reproduction was most likely due to the revealing characteristics of my amp/preamp. This would surely be cured by a high quality external DAC (Bel Canto, etc.) However, the omni-present noise of the transport (laser) mechanism while in play was very bothersome and noticeable from at least 6 feet away during quieter passages. Similar Products Used: rotel, audio refinement, other budget players |
[Mar 06, 2001]
bill
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Timbre, clarity, musical bass, undigital upper midrange, imaging
Weakness:
image not as holographic as $3000 players Unquestionably best CDP under $1200. Somebody thinks it's slow? Check your speakers, they're the only things operating at less than lightspeed. What, electrons are driving down the wires in little quantum VW's. Come on. The DAC thing is for real. My first unit refused to play after I had it awhile; the lights were on but nobody home. I sent it back to audio advisor and had a replacement the next day. new one works flawlessly. Break in is more like 360 hours than 36. Teamed with tube pre and mains it's beyond analog. The overall 4 rating is because I hate so many reviewers defending there budget gear to the death. Similar Products Used: AR Complete, Classe' .5, NAD, Adcom 750, REGA 2000 |
[Feb 28, 2001]
Scott
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Wonderful sound, in spite of the fact that music doesn't come in bites. None of the harshness that I hate about CD's. I like the design too: nothing extra to drive up the price. this is an answer to the review above regarding the delay in sound. I bought a D500se and it got to a point where I'd put in a cd, take a shower, start dinner, and maybe by then the sound would come on. I didn't buy the story about it being deliberately designed that way, and returned it to the store for another one, which works ok. It was clearly a glitch in the machine, which is apparently not ususual. I love the player, but Cambridge Audio should be a bit more forthcoming about this issue and not respond with hocus pocus about how it has to reach 12db's before you hear anything. Similar Products Used: I bought a cheap Panasonic CD player when they first came out and hated it so much that I rarely used it. Now that vinyl is hard to get, I realized I had little choice and heard that CD players sound better than they used to if you buy a good one. This snowballed into replacing my whole system. |
[Mar 01, 2001]
Jack
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
price, sound quality
Weakness:
No HDCD This is for the SE version. Similar Products Used: NAD, Rotel |
[Feb 24, 2001]
Howard
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Smooth, warm high end; great stereo imaging; silver SE version looks cool; incredible value
Weakness:
jog shuttle thingy, no time remain function on display I auditioned this unit largely on the basis of reviews here and in various hifi mags. I was searching for a warm-ish sounding CD player to replace my 3-year-old Yamaha 5-disk changer, which I found particularly harsh in the upper registers. I had recently bought psb stratus bronze speakers and NAD c350 integrated amplifier, both of which were not known as having a bright sound, so I figured the most likely culprit was my CD player. Similar Products Used: Yamaha, Sony, NAD, AMC |
[Jan 05, 2001]
Peter
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
This player can make you forget you're listening to digital. A real class act. This is what CD was meant to be.
Weakness:
Lack of time-remaining feature. Jog shuttle seems kind of pointless The D500 hardly needs any more praise but I can't resist. I did an A/B comparison with my old CD4 (non-SE) and the difference was not subtle. The CD4's heart is in the right place and was great value for its time, but even right out of the box the D500 smokes it in every respect. Especially noteworthy are the D500's excellent reproduction of instrument timbre and its ability to make sense of complex mixes and dymamic passages. This player manages to sound open, detailed, musical and smooth all at once. Quite a feat. It reminds me of the "good ol' days" of vinyl. I've heard other players that try to pull this stunt off (some very expensive ones at that), but they end up sounding either "glossy" or "shut in". With the D500 there is no loss of detail or presence. In fact, there is more subtlety and inflection than most players I've heard. And the pseudo-detail that we're so used to with digital sources (over-emphasised transient attacks, for instance) is all but gone, allowing greater insight into the music and long-term listening without fatigue. This is an exceptional product and unbelievable value. |
[Dec 28, 2000]
Jonathan Gleadle
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Great Sound, Understated looks, Upgradable
Weakness:
Lack of remote power on/off As soon as I listened to first track, Absolutly amazed with the sound. I dident realy need another CD player but now that I have it I am very happy. None of my other CD players even come close to the d500, but they arnt supposed to I guess. I have them more for the convience. Other Components in my system Cambridge Audio C500, 3 P500's, V500 and the M1 enhanced remote. Similar Products Used: None, but also own Sony cdp-cx300 and Pioneer PDR-509 |