Cambridge Audio C500 Preamplifiers
Cambridge Audio C500 Preamplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Sep 17, 2001]
Yellow Man
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Price, sound.
Weakness:
remote, volume potentiometer. This is a cool designed preamp. Regarding build quality it is OK, except remote. Volume potentiometer (especially motor - is poor). It has too dynamic volume control at low levels. And when you volume down with the remote, the motor transmitting weird sounds. Except these it is all right. Similar Products Used: none |
[Oct 07, 2001]
Todd
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
clean, affordable
Weakness:
can't select source from remote (no big deal to me) Plugged my CD-Player (with digital volume control) directly into my RB-1070 and then put the C500 in between. I could not hear any difference (besides volume adjustments). I don't believe there's any other pre-amp out there for this money that will be this transparent. (Are there any other pre-amps out there for this money at all???) Similar Products Used: Auditioned: B&K, Rotel (integrated) |
[Aug 11, 1999]
Dave
an Audio Enthusiast
After buying a pair of Magenpans, I needed to acquire a power/preamp combo to drive them, and was on a tight budget. A local dealer pointed me to the new Cambridge Audio C-500. The cost was right ($250, + $55 for optional phono stage), so I thought I'd give it a chance. Here's what I found: |
[Sep 04, 1999]
Dean
an Audio Enthusiast
I just recently picked this unit up for $450 Cdn. I had a custom built tube linestage as the pre-amp in my setup, but the gain was set a little high for the rest of my gear and my current listenting environment, so I got the C500 to fill in until I have a dedicated listening room. Listening - The previous review is right, this is a very neutral pre-amp and does not appear to colour the sound in any distinctive way. The 'Direct' switch is nice, as you can bypass the tone controls for a cleaner sound. I've found this to be the case. If you don't need to alter the sound of your existing setup (not too bright or too warm) and you want to bring out the best of your modestly priced equipment, the C500 would be an excellent choice. |
[Nov 11, 1999]
Alfred Fredel
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Neutral
Weakness:
remote I upgraded my system in the study to Cambridge Audio equipment. Bought a P500 and a C500. This combination is better than I imagined. The C500 is just plain neutral...a great thing! It has a direct setting that allows for a direct signal transfer from the source through the amp without coloring the sound. I am also using a D500 cd player. I didn't realize that you could get such goos sound with inexpensive equipment. I plan to pick up another P500 and bi-amp in a few months. My only petty complaint is that the remote does not control everything. It does not open the cd player nor turn on the power ...but this is minor. I am giving this product 5 stars on sheer value alone. There are much better products out there, but few that give you so much for so little. Similar Products Used: amc 1100/ amc2100 |
[Mar 07, 2001]
Dick Austin
Audiophile
Strength:
Features, price, build quality, the fact that it exists.
Weakness:
I was completely happy with the remote, the features, and the styling. Well, maybe it could use a mono switch. I wanted an inexpensive remote passive preamp with a phono section, but this is as close as I could get. I'm completely satisfied with the features and styling, right down to the truly clever upside-down labeling of the inputs (so it reads upright when viewed from the top). I was not quite as happy with the sound. While the sound is fine - more than fine - for the price, there is a reason why top of the line preamps cost upwards of $1500. In comparison to my $2.39 passive preamp, there was a strange 'eeee' sound that modulated the quanization noise (or was it tape hiss?) of many of my CDs that was not present when using the passive preamp. I also found the bass lacking in ultimate articulation, with bass instruments not as well placed. The soundstage was slightly narrower and was placed a bit farther away from the listener as compared to the passive preamp. Most noticeably, there was an overall 'inexpensiving' of the sound compared to my passive preamp, where instrument tone did not quite emerge from a background of black silence, was not as clearly localized in space, and lacked the ultimate in dynamic contrast. But shoot, if you're on a $279 budget, this has got to be the way to go, although there are some Creek passive/remote products that you could combine yourself to make a similar configuration. Similar Products Used: Hafler DH-110 Preamp w/Musical Concepts Mods |