NAD C 270 Amplifiers
NAD C 270 Amplifiers
USER REVIEWS
[Jan 21, 2021]
ogilview82
Strength:
May we ask how much this CAMBRIDGE AUDIO AZUR 640A INTEGRATED AMPLIFIERS worth? Those quality subwoofer is more expensive for sure. montgomery landscaping contractors Weakness:
I will observe it first |
[Jan 19, 2021]
Stefun69
Strength:
This amp has a clarity way way above its price bracket . Cant wait to get a second one and bridge the two .as it is i have my Cyrus 6xp d as a pre amp going through the nad and the sound is so effortless and real . Just a great amp. Speakers B&W 603 s2 . Weakness:
Availability . Rare Price Paid: 135
Purchased: Used
Model Year: 1995
|
[Dec 02, 2020]
gabrielahammond4
Strength:
This looks very classy and it makes the sound really clean and smooth. Steel Siding Services Weakness:
Power, bridging, soft clipping, and input switches could be better. |
[Nov 25, 2020]
stevens
Strength:
Rich sound, laid back yet accurate presentation of music. Very clean treble, almost silvery, and defined bass. Palpable midrange and tons of power. Impedence Sensing Circuitry allows economic use of power in relation to speaker loads. Weakness:
custom stickers | print stickers | business printing | printing company Purchased: Used
|
[Feb 28, 2019]
Donny
Strength:
Purchased a used C270 to bridge to mono to match my existing C270. What a masterpiece and a bargain. I can't believe the difference bridging this amp makes to the overall sound. The NAD goal of bringing the best sound to the masses without the unnecessary bells and whistles stands out with this unit. I am looking into recapping these masterpieces and having them for another 15 to 20 years. Vintage Hi-fi lives and thrives! Can't wait to try them with an upgraded DAC and FLAC digital files. After the recap I would like to compare them with Bryston amps to see if the price and 20 warranty is worth the thousands of dollars extra. Would love to compare these to the NAD Master series amps as well. Weakness:
The only weakness I can note is some of the build quality. Power cord could be a better quality. Power, bridging, soft clipping, and input switches could be better. Purchased: Used
|
[Oct 21, 2017]
juan
AudioPhile
|
[Mar 16, 2014]
Jon Lusk
Audio Enthusiast
I have loved sound and the likes of Adcom, Counterpoint, Carver, Audio Research, Acurus, Sim Audio, Emotiva and Cary for close to 30 yrs now. Recently I had to part with my Cary due to financial difficulties so I purchased one of these after reading lots of reviews and I must say "WOW" this amp is a stone cold killer of a bargain! Now comparing It to the likes of the Cary or Sim Audio, Audio Research it unfair simply because they are much better but at 5 X 10 times the price or more. With that said this amp would and does hold it's own in every way! The reserve power and depth of the soundstage is simply amazing at this price point and honestly you will have to spend 5 X the price to get better. Love it and have purchased the 2100 for my center channel and bridged it. My Cary was 200 X 5 compared to 120 x 2 of the c270 and I have had to adjust the decibel level down by 2 with the NAD's compared to the Cary.. Highly recommended!! |
[Oct 09, 2009]
Lee
Audio Enthusiast
I use 4 of these for my bluray 7.1 system. It sounds amazing this is clearly one of the best amps ever made for the price tag. Nad really got it right even with the new c7320 and the c272 the c270 and c370 still sound better. There is so much power and clarity in these amps. Is there anybody else out there who has used it in a 4 amp 7.1 surround system. I would love to hear your views |
[Dec 14, 2008]
twc644
Audio Enthusiast
Strength:
Has 2 pairs of speaker post and adjustable gain to match any preamp on the planet.Provides a nice warm sound.Has no problem driving two pairs of speakers that are listed at 8 ohms.I would not advise doing this with 4 or 6 ohms though.
Weakness:
I wont fault NAD for this but once the smaller caps start aging the amp has to work harder and forces it to get warmer temp wise.This applies to any piece of older equipment due to age.
Update: Now owning this amp 5 years later from my last review and still going strong.It was running a little warm so I changed out 95% of the tired smaller capacitors from 1uf to 2200uf.This restored the dynamics and lowered the overall temp of the amp.It sounds better than new and is driving two pairs of modified Polk bookshelfs.
|
[Nov 30, 2003]
rsmcphee
AudioPhile
Strength:
MUSICALITY, DIMENSIONALITY, NON-FATIGUING, ENJOYABLE AND AFFORDABLE
Weakness:
Not the most detail or most dynamics in comparison to the ultra highend (above $4000)amps out there. I have 3 of these for home theater running a Martin Logan Ascent, Martin Logan Theater i, and Martin Logan Scenarios. Also, I matched the NADs with the Rotel 1066 surround sound processor. My sources include Samsung HD931, Pioneer A563A universal player, and Musical fidelity A324 upsampling DAC. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the Martin Logan speakers, they are one of the most demanding speakers to drive for any amplifier. I must admit I had my concerns when I first hook up the NADs 270 with the Martin Logans, but after listening to them and allowing them to break in about 100 hours, I was immediatedly floored when I heard the sweetness of vocals that comes out of my speakers. The instruments had space and dimensionality that can only be associated with great amplifiers such as Krell KAV500, Pass X3, ATI 2007, and Simaudio Titan. I have owned all these high end amplifiers but I must admit the NAD is very very good in comparison to high end amplifiers. Of course my favorite is the Simaudio Titan, but then again it is $6300 retails versus the inexpensive NADs. Going back to the NAD, it is very easy to listen to. If I had describe it I will simply call it NAD's non-fatiguing, natural sounding character. In comparison to the $6300 Simaudio, the NAD has less dynamics and less air. But for the money, it is a wonderful bargain. The Simaudio and NAD comparison is not really fair, its like comparing a Ferrari and a Nissan. There is simply no contest in sound quality. Of course, the NAD losses in this comparo, but what is surprising is for the money this little amplifier gives out sound that can be more associated with high end equipment. I really enjoy this amplifier especially when matched with the Martin Logan Scenarios. It makes the Martin Logan Scenarios sing with imaging and realism. The partnership between the Scenarios and the NAD C270 had me smiling from ears to ears. Now, switching to home theater, I heard same sound in music. The sound is clear, crisp and non fatiguing. The bullets were flying all around the room with Matrix Reloaded and it seems like the amplifier provided enough low end when needed. The dialogue were easily understood and the music background were heard without being overly done. In short, this amplifier works double duty as home theater amplifier and stereo amplifier. Get 3 of these for 5.1 setup and you will smiling without a doubt for theater application. It may not be the most detail amplifier in the world, but for the overall musicality and listenability I will gladly give this amplifiers a 5 star without reservation. I bought this amplifier for my second home theater from BRETT INTERIORS 520-733-9896 and they were very helpful in helping me match my system for very affordable price. Thanks NAD and Thanks Brett Interiors for such musical equipment!!! Similar Products Used: KRELL KAV 500, ATI 2007, PASS X3, SIMAUDIO TITAN |