McIntosh MC275 Amplifiers

McIntosh MC275 Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

75w x2 Channels

USER REVIEWS

Showing 21-22 of 22  
[Oct 01, 2000]
Klaus Mathisen
Audiophile

Strength:

Good sound (when it works), classic looks.

Weakness:

Hopeless ergonomics (i.e. speaker terminals), rotten reliability, technical backup.

I bought the Norwegian imprter's demo MC275 (reissue version), and after approx. 18 months it started to produce extreme distortion in both channels. I've got three different sets of outout tubes, so it isn't. that. I returned it to the importer's, and they kept it for four weeks without managing to repair it. So now it just sits there, waiting for me to get the courage to sling it and try to forget about it.

Similar Products Used:

McIntosh C22, Accuphase DP-65, Sonus Faber Extrema

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
[Nov 17, 2000]
Ed
Audiophile

Strength:

Not the most detailed of amps, but enough detail to satisfy all music lovers except for the most hard-core audiophiles (or solid-state freaks). Lush, warm, sweet, deep, wide, focused, non-fatiguing and authoritative (especially in mono). Unlike some solid-state Macs, it doesn't lose transparancy when bridged into mono mode. Enough power and current (as monoblocks) to drive a Martin Logan CLS Z 2. Oh yes, and damn sexy looking!

Weakness:

Doesn't possess state-of-the-art bass control, but highly improved when bridged and used as monoblocks. Not as good as the McIntosh MC 2000 (what is?)

I bought my amp in 1995 or 1996 and it drove my Proac Response 3 beautifully. I felt that compared to my ARC, it was more liquid and sweeter. Don't know if you can call it coloured, but I found myself drawned into the music so much more. Bass wasn't as deep or tight as most solid-state amps I've heard, but I could live with it. Although it had 75 watts, I never heard it clip.

Recently, I switched to a Martin Logan CLS Z 2. The Macs drove them adequately, but sometimes they felt just that tiny bit short of breath. At 86 dB SPL and a punishing load of 1 to 2 ohms, the MLs were strangling the MC 275s. I recently acquired another MC 275 (at $3500), bridged it to run at 150 watts per channel, and ran them as monoblocks. Straight out of the box, without running them in, I heard the difference. It was twice as good! It makes me wonder how they'd sound on on my erstwhile speakers, the Proac Response 3s.

Similar Products Used:

Too many to name, but principly Audio Research Classic 120s and Mark Levinson 27.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 21-22 of 22  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com