Arcam Alpha 9 Amplifiers

Arcam Alpha 9 Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

75w x 2 into 8 ohms

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 48  
[Aug 03, 2023]
cecelia


Strength:

I still own this unit for 18 years and it still rocks it doesn't go down to the stated 20 hz but it still does a great job on music and cinema. | palm tree removal auckland

Weakness:

None . .

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[May 02, 2023]
Zucco


Strength:

The alpha 9 is a very pleasant amp to live with. It's punchy, colourful, images well and you can listen to it all day without fatigue.

Weakness:

Perhaps not the most open or detailed amp so if you're into lots of detail, look elsewhere.

Price Paid:
£150
Purchased:
Used  
OVERALL
RATING
4
[Feb 06, 2023]
powerless277


Strength:

To start with the DC motors, very strong and treating the tapes far more better than overpowered AC motors. Not to mention about the huge capacitors these motors need. But 2 DC motors together with the hall controlled tension arms on both sides of the capstans, this is a perfect combination of precise mechanism. San Leandro Mobile Truck Repair

Weakness:

None . .

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Dec 02, 2020]
gabrielahammond4


Strength:

It is a really good amplifier, it makes the sounds smooth and warm. Exterior Residential Painting

Weakness:

No complains at all

OVERALL
RATING
5
[Dec 01, 2020]
dave colton


Strength:

I had an old Yamaha AX400 for a few years after my Audiolab 8000A died but it was never going to replace it so I was looking to buy a new ARCAM or Audiolab this month. However a chance conversation led me to buy this old Alpha 9. When I put 'After the Flood' by Talk Talk (my reference LP) the hairs on my neck stood up! I've had Tannoy Little Red monitors from my last commercial studio as my home speakers for 25 years but have never found an amp that sounded right but this amp is wonderful. The detail and stereo image is the best I've ever heard on these speakers at low volume but with added musicality and warmth. Everything I throw at it sounds great,Deep House, Jazz, Old 70's rock on CD (Quad 77) or Vinyl (PL12D /OM2 Blue) or Cassette (Nakamitchi 1.5). I won't be looking for a new amp instead I'll spend the cash on some smaller modern floor standers! Not sure how old the amp is? Late 90's?

Weakness:

I can see that some would find the sound a bit too warm it may be that my very transparent speakers need that.

Price Paid:
100
Purchased:
Used  
Model Year:
1999
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Aug 01, 2020]
ricmusicfan


Strength:

It is versatile

Weakness:

Input selector fails upon time

Purchased:
Used  
OVERALL
RATING
4
[Jul 28, 2020]
marcel


Strength:

In 1999 the sound was great and it still is. Using the amp with an Arcam DAC for streaming.

Weakness:

As with almost all Arcam Alpha’s 8 and 9 the input selector switch is crappy. No wonder after > 20 years. Can be fixed though.

Price Paid:
160
Purchased:
Used  
Model Year:
1999
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Jul 26, 2008]
Janinea
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

very good value
refined sound

Weakness:

Could have a little more clarity on mine, but there is some corrosion on my selector swith.

Basically I think the other reviewers here have it about right. i would just like to mention that the source selecting knob contacts can oxidise and that can limit sound quality - muffle it. This is cheap to fix if you do get one from ebay.

Also worth mentioning is that biwiring this amp seemed to improve the sound quality hugely (tech info: the induced feedback current from the speaker seemed to set up some resonant bass hum via the amp).

I have not bi amped, but not sure if it will make a huge difference on my 6 ohm monitor audio RS8's.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 01, 2008]
wrx74
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Music breathes freely and naturally thru this equipment

Quality built -since the amp/cd player has been around since 1998,the fact that they are still working well today shows they have quality tho the exterior makes people feel they are not.

Weakness:

I wished the exterior would look like the FMJ or Diva series

I was a bit doubtful that the Arcam alpha 9 was able to deliver since it doesnt weigh much (about 5 kgs) and rated at 75watts per channel.The last integrated amp i owned prior to the Alpha 9 was the huge PM7200 which lured me into buying due to its size and larger RMS watts per channel.

The Marantz was indeed good value but somehow its sound does not covey as as much emotion to draw me into music.I started looking around and picked up the Alpha9 from someone changing to a Cyrus amp and remembered i was pleased with Alpha 8 only wishing it had a bit more power.A side by side test of the marantz 7200 and Arcam Alpha 9 was obvious.The vocals from Norah Jones Come away with me album feels more alive on the Arcam and music was more open and seemed to fill the room more than the Marantz.Even my girlfriend who doesnt believe much differences between components could tell the difference in the test.The Marantz does the basic job of presenting music well but doesnt give "life" to music.I think it means when you are playing a cd, u can feel that the performer is alive and performing "to you" rather than sound generated by equipment.All sound must come from equipment just that the Arcam makes u forget that and enjoy the music.

Craving for extra Power, i bought th Alpha 9P which improves bass and separation.Its probably not the best equipment to play rock and bassy music but it does a very good job for relaxing music.So far for me,having owned for 2yrs now, i have no plans to upgrade yet and listening at Audio shops dont really blow me away as i know my system can deliver within my budget or they just fooling you with room acoustics.

Now the Alpha 9 combo sits in my living room and I've gotten the Arcam Delta 290/290P in my bedroom.Both are my treasured possessions.

My equipment:
Arcam Alpha9(Qed P75)
Arcam Alpha 9P(Qed P75)
Arcam Alpha 9 cd player(Qed P75)
Tannoy Revolution 3 (biwired with QED xtube300)

Arcam Delta 290(Qed P75)
Arcam Delta 290P(Qed P75)
Arcam Alpha 8SE(Qed P75)
Tannoy Revolution 2 (biwired with QED xtube300)

Similar Products Used:

Marantz PM 7200
NAD 302
Arcam Alpha 8 Integrated

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 15, 2008]
Shane Diaz
AudioPhile

Strength:

Very articulate presentation, pair them with matching speakers with a max power rating of at LEAST half of what the amp can drive. Eg. BW 602S3 Max power input 100W @ 8Ohms, Arcam Alpha 9 = 70W@ohms which is a little more than 2/3rds of the speakers handling capability.

Weakness:

....I can't say, A lot of people say this or that, but at the end of the day it really depends on your source, speaker matching and interconnects. Kinda like cooking, Use the ingredients correctly and you'll be surprised what you can come up with. Remember audiophile listening just like tasting is subjective.

Equipment Used:

Rotel RCD 951
Philips PXT1000 RCA Cables
Bowers & Wilkins Dm 603S3
Arcam Alpha 9 (no power amp just yet)

...First thing first, every audiophile has his/her quest for that perfect, "sound" . A recreation as it were of that audio demo we heard in store somewhere, sound so sweet it made us literally driiiiift with the hairs at the back of our necks on end.
In my case it was the Bowers 800D's with a classe setup.

Im 27 this year, still a little far from having the ability for that kind of setup, but in the meantime my current equipment in my room will have to do. I got this amplifier after extensive research. With a tight budget my choices were the Cambridge Audio 640V2, NAD 372, and a second hand Arcam alpha 9. Cosmetically Cambridge is the better LOOKING of the the three, but having bowers with its metal tweeters the cambridge was already a big no no. (Cambridge audio equipment is designed specifically for speakers with silk dome tweeters for the purposes of imitating valve sound in a solid state configuration) ..Nad, hmm, no doubt also an incredible amplifier but with the majority of reviewers complaining about faults after an average of about 2 years simply turned me away due to poor build quality (and believe me nad has really shocking quality) which leads me to Arcam, I recieved my box with great anticipation...only to be disapointed by this cheap plastic fascia that greeted me. Looking inside through the grilles on the top cover I caught a glimpse of the massive torroidal power block, I knew that this was a serious piece of hardware. I carefully opened the shell, observing that Arcam must have cut the budget on the cosmetics as the metal shell was incredibly thin. Inside however was a tooootalllly different story, rubicon 10,000uf capacitors, a 400VA torroidal block and a very very neat and organised circuit board, Volume Control, Tone and balance switches were all made of high quality parts some of which had the 'JAPAN' markings on it. Clearly all expense was spared for the build quality. Of the the three amps mentioned, Arcam came out on top with flying colours. Vacuming the dust that was collected by the previous owner, this amp started to look like a Datsun with a ferrari engine.

Plugging in all the cables etc. I switched the amp on, after a few seconds maybe if "clickshat" to life as if to indicated its readiness to drive whatever is thrown at it. I popped in my 'Best Audiophile voices' and was apalled at the initial sound. I couldn't understand how this amp sounded so terrible. The sound was forward, but unrefined, not harsh, but simply unrefined, all the details were there, but the intrgration between mids, bass and high frequencies was just...off. I thought that if maybe I biwered my speakers it would sound better, but it ended up sounding worse. Really bad. Worse than the cambridge.
I eventually returned the brdiges on the boswers, kept the cables to the SPKR1 terminals and thought this was it.

upon my researching back to Nad equipment, (hoping that maybe if I do get one of their units it would be one of the very lucky few) I observed at the back of their panels they have jumpers that bridge both the Pre amp out, and Main in jacks. I reverted back to my unit and noticed that Arcam Leaves these terminals open hoping that buyers will use their Power amps to accompany their integrateds. hesitantly I shaved some old copper wires and bridged these two terminals.

I turned the amp on expecting with a slight worry that I may burn a capaciotr or something.....popped in a Jheena Lodwick HDCD...sat back raised the volume to 8oclock.......and woooow...
What I heard was a sound that was faaaar more tight. More controlled, I then began to truly experience the Arcam sound. Details started to appear, very forward but controlled. Light years ahead of Cambridge, and maybe a foot or two ahead of Nad. It presented an overall well crafted/ chiselled output. It doesn't give the "air" of rotel, or the lushness of tubes, but instead a very very articulate presentation. One that could make you stay planted in your chair for a few hours. Its hard to say all those things without any reference to harshness...but thats what makes it unique, forward but without ear fatigue.

Currently it drives my bowers to an 'ok' level I seldomly reach 10 o'clock as this starts to present distortion due to it being underpowered. Im hoping to couple it with a rotel 1070, but am a bit intrepid with gain matching...will just wait and see.

if you can find the alpha 9's or 10's in working condition, Grab them, Parts inside are really well built. Brush the dust off, polish up the fascia, pair them with a decent pair of METAL tweeter speakers, Monitor audios, paradigm, BW etc (the alpha arcams sound terrible with silk domes)





OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 48  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com