Sony STR-DA333ES A/V Receivers
Sony STR-DA333ES A/V Receivers
[Jul 24, 1999]
Anthony
an Audiophile
I received my sony 333ES about a day ago and man was I impressed. I hunted for a receiver for about a month now, my kenwood 1080 VR was getting old so I decided to to sell it. So far I had the pioneer VSX 608, the yahama 795dts and the kenwood 309 VR and I was displeased with the sound from all of them compared to my kenwood. So I picked up a sony es 333 and for 80 watts this thing rocks!!!! My kenwwod was 120 X 3 in the front and my sony beat it out. The sounds are crisp, clean and very clear the two power supplies are noticed when highs are reached. The setup was easy, I know alot of people were saying it was tedious but if you have some experience with recievers you'll have no problem. The remote is cool the only thing I didn't like is that you have to open the flip part to use the numbers for your cable box, and then flip it shut to control the volume but no biggie. The sony does run hot so keep it open for air but with the 5 warrenty I not worried. The only receiver that compares for the price is the yahama 795 which is a awesome product but I noticed that the bass wasn't noticed as much compared to my kenwood and compare it to the sony and you can forget about it the sony destroys it. So if your looking for a good quality receiver for the price ($500-$600) I got mine for $550, get the sony 333es I would buy it over and over and over again. I give it 5 stars!!!! |
[Jul 15, 1999]
Barista Bill
an Audio Enthusiast
After a short 5 days, it arrived. I got my 333ES from SoundCity.Com for $549 shipped to my door, which in my book, I made out like a bandit. I had no problems dealing with StereoCity, and the package came well padded with the receiver box unopened (I was a little worried about ordering from a company I found online.) |
[Jul 29, 1999]
BRET
a Casual Listener
I talked my local dealer down to $540 on this one, so I couldn't resist giving it a try. I previously had a Pioneer#608, which I returned. Comparatively speaking, the Sony has much better dynamics, imaging, and bass presence than the Pioneer. I never though I would be saying such things about recievers...I used to think that they were all the same. I'm sure there are better sounding recievers out there, but to me the small increment in sound quality hardly offsets the huge increase in price. The 333ES is not without its own demerits, however. The two-way remote is very slow when you just want to switch radio stations or soundfields. Like everyone else has said, it runs real hot, which is never desirable in electronic equipment, but alas, the 5 year warranty puts my fears to rest. |
[Aug 02, 1999]
lsm
a Casual Listener
After reading the reviews from this site we purchased the 333ES from One Call. The receiver arrived in two days and worked great out of the box. A few days to figure out the controls and found the receiver lived up to the reviews from this site. It's hooked up to the Boston Acoustics System 9000 speakers and DVDs are now something to be experienced. This combination replaces an old Sony surround sound receiver and Boston Sub Sat speakers and now we are in audio heaven. This site saved us over $200 versus purchasing the receiver from a local audio retailer. Thanks. |
[Aug 09, 1999]
Cant Decide
an Audio Enthusiast
I have a difficult choice of which receiver to get. I've looked around on the net and have noticed good reviews for the STR-DA333ES and STR-DE925. The DE925 has more power, but I rarely go over more than 1/3 volume of my current sony reciever. Does the 333ES just sound better? Also, where is a good place to buy one on the net? |
[Aug 15, 1999]
George
an Audio Enthusiast
Quick follow up on my comments posted yesterday on the STR-DA333ES : |
[Aug 11, 1999]
George
a Casual Listener
I recently purchased the 333ES and have been thoroughly impressed. I am replacing my Denon, you really do not appreciate high quality equipment until you have something to compare it to in the same room. I did a comparison between several units in the sopund room at a local "Good Guys", they had the 333es listed for $799 but would make me a "deal" at $750, I bought it from SoundCity for $545. This unit had a lower power rating than my Denon but the sound was clean throughout the entire power range,which is something I have never experienced before. The remote is a pain in the ass though, waiting for it to download info from the unit gets boring. But for the money it is the best unit I have seen. |
[Aug 29, 1999]
SGC
an Audio Enthusiast
I have had the 333ES for about 2 weeks now. In general I consider it to be a very good receiver. Most of the receiver’s details have been summarized in other reviews so I will just give my impressions, and the goods and bads. The review is a little long, but I hope informative. |
[Aug 28, 1999]
AsanLeung
an Audio Enthusiast
Just got this unit from one call. Sound quality is good. But the remote suckes. I cannot turn on this unit from remote. Am I the only one experiencing this? Also most of the connection terminals on the back of this unit suck: not gold plated. What a waste for me to buy all those fancy gold plated interconnectors. You know it's useless to have high end gold plated connector will the terminal is plain nickle plated. Also the speaker binding post won't take Spade. Sony should have done better. May be that's the reason why you can buy this for cheap from net. I can only give it 3 stars. |
[Aug 12, 1999]
ROBERT G
an Audio Enthusiast
I think this Sony ES line in a 3 speaker sound quality but the pricing makes it a 2 overall for the price (I agree somewhat with a previous reviewer about people paying for name brands). But I do disagree with a previous poster about HK having all their problems solved and with so many bad AVRs still on the market (I seriously doubt they recalled them all, not cost effective) since people within the last two months still post problems with currently acquired HK products (45 & 65). I think the Sony is a little bright, but the HK sounds a little too rolled off (and they also have a cinema Re-Q?). The Sony seems to me the better buy between the two but personally I would put my money in a Denon, Yamaha, or Onkyo in the similar price range as I think you will get more AVR for the money. I will give this AVR a 4 to offset the 1 given by the individual who did not use a progressive scale to reflect quality and price (after all an 1 is given to something that is defective like a bad HK AVR and the customer service follow-up given to those who were loyal to them as reported on this site; giving people a shielded cable instead of telling people to send it for repair...). My personal opinion is a 3 but justice must be done. |