|
Review NaN of
, from Belgrade, Yugoslavia
Price Paid:
$350.00
from 2nd hand Summary: This deck looks fine and has a plenty of features, of which I liked the NAAC most of all. The sound is warm and very precise, it is obvious that it has a very good high frequency response. Compatibility with the tapes made on other decks is excellent.
But, this deck is very sensitive to the way you use it. It is very very complicated, with electronics that is pretty hard to service and mechanism is it's own story, the serviceman should have previous experience in Nakamichi decks in order to service it (for instance, the rubber idler which should be replaced every 5-10 years is very hard to replace, and so are other two belts).
The build quality is very below it's price range, with too much plastic parts (the buttons), although the plastic is of a good quality (Nak 670ZX for instance uses long lasting metal buttons).
Direct tests to Teac Z-6000 (list price 2000 EUR) showed that Dragon plays better tapes made on other machines, but details especially on high frequences are the same, and TEAC Z6000 is much much better build machine.
I personally find Revox B215 much better of them both in any way.
The system used to test was:
Sony CDP-X555ES (1999. year model)
Meridian 101/105 Pre/power heavily modified
Viktor Bradac custom made speakers
So, finally:
sound: *****
build: **
durability and reliability: *
facilities: ****
overall: ** Strengths: Very warm and precise sonund, tape calibrating facilities, auto azimuth, auto reverse, the look. Weaknesses: Sometimes hard to get used to, build quality is well below it's price range, gets unadjusted by itself from time to time etc... You should treat it like a lady. It is very expensive to get fixed, also. Similar Products Used: Teac Z-6000, Sony TC-K970ES, Yamaha KX-1200, Denon DR-M 33 and 44, Revox B215, Nakamichi 670ZX and more than 60 other decks
|