|
Review NaN of
, from San Antonio, TX
Price Paid:
$2400.00
from Private Seller Summary: The Request is a fabulous speaker. I can provide an interesting contrast between the Request and newer Odysseys that I owned for a year prior to getting the Requests:
Odysseys are better than Requests with:
* Low level detail (5% better)
* Transparency (5% better)
* Bass detail and balance (10% better)
* Macro and micro dynamics (10% better)
* Treble balance (the Request's treble is slightly lower in level (5% better)
Requests and Odysseys are equal with soundstaging and imaging (excellent)
Requests are better than Odysseys with:
* Midrange: This is a big difference! The Requests have one of the most palpable, 3D midranges I've ever heard from any loudspeaker (and I've listed to a lot of different models at length over the years). I would recommend the Request to anyone on this basis alone.
*Bass power and dynamics: The Requests deliver a combination of bass power, extension, and tightness that I normally only hear from very large, expensive speakers at trade shows.
* Lushness: Requests offer a very smooth, tubelike sound that makes them very easy to listen to for extended periods.
Conclusion: If you asked me to choose between the Odyssey or Request I would say; If your goal is accuracy or evaluating upstream components, get the Odyssey. If your goal is the enjoyment of music, get the Request, especially given the price difference between the two models. Strengths: * Lush, tubelike, palpable midrange
* Very powerful, extended, tight bass
* Value in terms of what you get per dollar invested (in used market) Weaknesses: * Not quite as detailed as the lastest ML designs (but the difference is not huge)
* Not quite as dynamic as the newer ML Odyssey, but again not a huge difference. Similar Products Used: Pretty much all ML models in the past 10 years excluding the Monolith or Statement
|