|
|
|
Top Ranked Products from Copland.
|
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Ilko Alexandrov(Unregistered User)
(AudioPhile)
Review Date April 17, 2003Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
4 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
6.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 1 of 11
Price Paid:
$2000.00
from Audionote Summary: A follow up on the previous review .. Taking my words back about bass limitations.. Upgraded this baby w/ Mullard E88CC NOS in the line stage and replaced the ML output - firstly w/ AMC 2100e (re-capped) and now w/ Leak ST60 (re-tubed for now ;-)) .. Musical Fidelity as source .. Shear majic ! Strengths: Soundstage, mids, highs, instrument placement & focus Weaknesses: Cannot think of anything worth mentioning Similar Products Used: Threshold, Rotel
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jens Ranefjord(Unregistered User)
(Audiophile)
Review Date April 17, 2001Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for 3 months to 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
4.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 2 of 11 Summary: Follow up:
This is a quick follow up, but things have happend. The Quad 99 is very, very sensitive to placement (the copland is not), and after some adjustments and new vibration absorbers, I really find the Quad99 to be the best allaround choice (im relieved, puh). Lacking is soundstage? Not anymore! Get up and go? Very much! The Copland is a little faster and has a bigger soundstage but it lacks in detail and neutrality compared to the Quad99, especially in the high and low range.
I still rate the Copland as one of the best at the price. Its pretty much a matter of taste.
Copland is great, to bad you cant buy them new anymore (ops, did I say to much). Yes its true. The Designer and the factory dont agree, so Copland is down for now and perhaps for good. Its a loss...
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Maceo(Unregistered User)
(Audiophile)
Review Date April 13, 2001Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for 3 months to 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
2.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 3 of 11 Summary: This is the best pre amp I've ever heard. I used to own one, but it broke down because of a fire we had some months ago! Well, I miss it. This is a good preamp and it works fine with solid state pwr amps too. Im using The new Quad pre now and its pretty good, but its lacking a bit in "get up and go" and soundstage. The copland is better. Buy it! I give it four stars because there are probobly better pre amps to but, but at the price, its a dream.
Systems tested with 301 mkII (:
1 cd: Denon dcd-1015 cd: Copland Cda 266 Spk: audio pro a4.14 zero "activ spk" Cbl: Supra cables
2 cd: Copland Cda 266 Pwr: Quad 99 Spk: Dynaudio contour 1.3se
Weaknesses: ? Similar Products Used: Quad 77 - 99, Audio Analouge, linn, naim
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Ingmar Benjaminsson(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date February 8, 2001Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 4 of 11 Summary: I bought this used (6 months old) preamp from a dealer in Sweden. Actually, this is the first audio equipment I´ve been happy with for more than 2 years. It still gives me that joyfull feeling every time I listen to music. And my impression is that it will last for eternity. Really heavy duty build!
There is not a single weakness I can point out as a disturbing one. My music taste covers almost everything from classical to rock´n roll. This Copland CTA301mkII can handle it all. You´ll never get tired! And never bored either!
Well, it´s not really cheap, but in my oppinion worth every penny, and a good investment. (around 1.500,- usd. in Sweden)
Other equipment used: CD-player: Sony CDP XA-30 ES Tube power amp: Edison 60 DIY speakers with Accuton 5" ceramic drivers and Raven ribbons. Subwoofer with Scanspeak 10" drivers.
Best regards, Ingmar Benjaminsson
Strengths: Rich and clear soundstage. Very sweet mids and treble. Clean bass. Suits all kinds of music. Great build and overall quality impression. Good looking! Weaknesses: I little lack of control in sub bass area? No remote control (available on new models) Similar Products Used: Quad 34, Tandberg 38A, Sentec SC-9
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Ilko Alexandrov(Unregistered User)
(Audiophile)
Review Date January 11, 2001Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for Less than 1 month |
|  | |
Review 5 of 11
Price Paid:
$1600.00
from Audiotronics Summary: What an improvement on the Thershold, which i view highly! New sounds, depth of soundstage, the sweet highs, did not have much time to listen until now. Tried some Roger Hodgson, Coldplay, Bob James on it - magic ! Bass is gone though - compared to the Threshold .. Config : Rotel RCD 991, Mark Levinson 27.5, Sonus Faber Concerto (biwired), top of the range IXOS - interconnects, speaker. Strengths: Very detailed preamp, with a beautiful 3D, transperant soundstage, sweet highs Weaknesses: Lacking in the bass. Controls look solid, but feel flimsy, easy to beak Similar Products Used: Threshold Fet2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audio and Video News & Press Releases.
|
|
|
|
Expert hi-fi audio reviews, blogs, and audio articles.
|
|
|