Bose 901 Floorstanding Speakers

Bose 901 Floorstanding Speakers 

DESCRIPTION

multi-drive speaker with equalizer

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 198  
[Nov 05, 2020]
ogilview82


Strength:

Bose never failed to amaze us with their products, BOSE 901 FLOORSTANDING SPEAKERS is a great speaker. www.denverwindowcleanse.com is the one who does the high rise window cleaning in our office and they are reliable window cleaning company.

Weakness:

Bose 901 doesn't have any weakness so far.

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Aug 28, 2020]
hamishheney5


Strength:

Waterproof Galaxy S9 case is Waterproof, Dust Proof, Snow Proof, Drop Proof, Shockproof and it has a HD clear scratch resistant screen guard to complete the protection. galaxy s9 cases

Weakness:

don't have any

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[May 08, 2020]
mjlohman


Strength:

I like that they are light, take up less space than they display in sound, and that although tedious and long, re-coning the drivers was relatively easy and the cement smelled good, lol. I was able to use good Velcro-strips up front to hold the grilles on, the back were relatively easy to remove. I had these connected to an Anthem MCA225 and WOW!! The miniDSP I got from Deer Creek however is lacking either that or my ears have really gone bad. Unfortunately the amp itself had a buzz, not in the music, in the amp. I sent it back the day after I got it. I am waiting for the Parasound 2125v2 to show up. 150 Watts doesn't seem like much but if I like the sound I will pick-up a second 2125 and bridge the power for 400W per channel per amp. Running everything out of a Parasound P7 preamp I expect that when my 901 Active EQ gets back from refurbishment from Rain City (I got pretty much everything done to it) the set will sound dynamite. I'm running Teac everything else, replacing an Onkyo roulette CD player... it's enormous plus, I'm just borrowing that. I will admit, the vinyl I played sounded very good on the pre-amp. Very nice in fact. Were they loud, yup, and very clear... the 4 hours I spent replacing the cones paid off, or was it six... man that glue was fumin' (got that from Simply Speakers for about 60-bucks. All together I paid about $800 for the set and did not get the tulip stands... never really cared for those. I will custom make a set later.

Weakness:

Now for the cons, it's either my ears, the miniDSP, or lack of good tone controls, but the setup sounded like too much bass, and too much treble - with the mid-range well compensated for, if not over compensated. With this setup however, no highs no lows was easily disproven but it lacked the commensurate middle voice. Don't get me wrong, it just sounded forced. This is why I cannot wait until the original EQ comes back as I'm sure they will be great afterward. If they're not, I will blame it on my ears and pick up the SVS Prime Pinnacle Towers I'm looking at as they sounded remarkable on my friend's Rotel set-up. He had B&W 603s(?) but the SVS sounded much better. Anyway, the stands, were I to want them, costing in excess of $400 a set shipped from any carpetbagger leaves room for wanting to assemble the complete ensemble.

Price Paid:
$400.00
Purchased:
Used  
Model Year:
1978
OVERALL
RATING
3
[May 08, 2020]
mjlohman


Strength:

I like that they are light, take up less space than they display in sound, and that although tedious and long, re-coning the drivers was relatively easy and the cement smelled good, lol. I was able to use good Velcro-strips up front to hold the grilles on, the back were relatively easy to remove. I had these connected to an Anthem MCA225 and WOW!! The miniDSP I got from Deer Creek however is lacking either that or my ears have really gone bad. Unfortunately the amp itself had a buzz, not in the music, in the amp. I sent it back the day after I got it. I am waiting for the Parasound 2125v2 to show up. 150 Watts doesn't seem like much but if I like the sound I will pick-up a second 2125 and bridge the power for 400W per channel per amp. Running everything out of a Parasound P7 preamp I expect that when my 901 Active EQ gets back from refurbishment from Rain City (I got pretty much everything done to it) the set will sound dynamite. I'm running Teac everything else, replacing an Onkyo roulette CD player... it's enormous plus, I'm just borrowing that. I will admit, the vinyl I played sounded very good on the pre-amp. Very nice in fact. Were they loud, yup, and very clear... the 4 hours I spent replacing the cones paid off, or was it six... man that glue was fumin' (got that from Simply Speakers for about 60-bucks. All together I paid about $800 for the set and did not get the tulip stands... never really cared for those. I will custom make a set later.

Weakness:

Now for the cons, it's either my ears, the miniDSP, or lack of good tone controls, but the setup sounded like too much bass, and too much treble - with the mid-range well compensated for, if not over compensated. With this setup however, no highs no lows was easily disproven but it lacked the commensurate middle voice. Don't get me wrong, it just sounded forced. This is why I cannot wait until the original EQ comes back as I'm sure they will be great afterward. If they're not, I will blame it on my ears and pick up the SVS Prime Pinnacle Towers I'm looking at as they sounded remarkable on my friend's Rotel set-up. He had B&W 603s(?) but the SVS sounded much better. Anyway, the stands, were I to want them, costing in excess of $400 a set shipped from any carpetbagger leaves room for wanting to assemble the complete ensemble.

Price Paid:
$400.00
Purchased:
Used  
Model Year:
1978
OVERALL
RATING
3
[Mar 30, 2020]
harmonxjim33


Strength:

This Bose 901 speaker produce remarkable sound that emulated from these small (for the time) speakers. Experience archery like never before in bowmasters game at the comfort of your PC

Weakness:

No weakness for 901 to this day

Purchased:
New  
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Mar 21, 2020]
rajugsw


Strength:

This review is for my 5.0 Channel Sealed Box Bose 901 Series 1 & 2 System. The Front Left & Right are Series’s 1 that date back to 1968. The Center Channel is 1972 Series 2, and the Surrounds are 1974 Bose 901 Series 2 Walnut Finish Continentals. The System Setup : 3 MiniDSP Balanced cards stuffed inside a Bose 901 Series 2 EQ Box with separate Toroidal power supply. 3 PS Audio M700 Amplifiers (350W @ 8Ω) for the Front L. C, R Channels 1 PS Audio S300 Amplifier for the L & R Surrounds PS Audio DirectStream Sr. DAC Sony STR-DN1080 AVR with “hacked by me” 6 Balanced (XLR) fixed level Audio Outputs Sony UBP-X1000ES with HDMI Video to I2S HDMI Adapter Boards AudioQuest Rocket 33 Speaker Cable, AudioQuest Cinnamon HDMI Cables, and AudioQuest Red River XLR Interconnects I had rebuilt many Series 2 equalizers and even converted them from single ended to true balanced (dual mono) for the front L, C, & R. But they would work great but would tend to breakdown occasionally. The solution was Deer Creek MiniDSP Balanced Boards. By dialing in and “Audiophile Approved” curve that I found on Rain City Audio’s website. These 901’s finally let the Genie out of the bottle ! Crisp high frequencies, beautiful non fatiguing Mids, and Deep Glorious Bass down to 35Hz. Whether it’s Classical, Jazz, or Classic Progressive Rock, or even my Son’s Hippety Hoppety (full of “N” words) music. These 50 years doped cloth surrounds 901’s do not fail. Subwoofer type Bass only when the Music or Movies require it ! DO NOT BUY Series 3 thru 6 unless you want to refoam 18 drivers. Buying those used is crapshoot at best. Unless the Seller removes the Grilles and shows you the condition of the Drivers. It Buer Beware.

Weakness:

The Bose Analog Box EQ Placement Sensitive - The Bose User’s Manual is a good start but you still need to experiment. My setup uses the rear wall but not the side walls so the directivity of the Speakers is more localized without the “Stereo Everywhere” effect. They ARE Audiophile Speakers before Bose went mass Market with the Series 3 - 6 Ported Foam Rotten Wonders

Price Paid:
$350
Purchased:
Used  
Model Year:
1968
OVERALL
RATING
5
[Mar 06, 2008]
Dwight DeLarge
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Extraordinary for concert and acoutic music. Very good for home theater.
Ease of listing, no coloration or stress (on ears) after long periods of play.
Can match or exceed any size, or priced speaker for sound clarity and three dimensional sound stage.

Weakness:

Absolutely none.

I joined the Navy in 1970, and was station on the U.S.S. Piedmont which in turn was deployed on a West-Pac to Yokoska Japan. I first heard the the Bose 901
series two, (dark brown grill, walnut top, and black metal pedestals) and could not believe the remarkable sound that emulated from these small (for the time) speakers. I lke my father before me, have a passion for music, but also for sophisticated electronics. Speakers such as AR's, Whardale and Boston Acoutic were speakers I had become accustomed too, and heard as I grew up. I thought that i had just about heard it all unitl I saw a demonstation of the Bose-901's.
I could not afford the $2000 dollar price tag ($US) tag, so I only could one day dream of owning a pair of these fine speakers. It would be 11 year's later, and a store by the name of WALL-TO-Wall, goiing out of business sale that allowed me to perchase my dream speakers. The sale price of $999.00 for the (901's series VI )speakers, walnut, with sand grills, active equilizer and matching sand colored metal pedestals. I have owned these speakers for over 25 years and could not be happier with the beauty of craftmenship, small and unobtrusive size and spacious magnificant sound.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Mar 02, 2008]
Markmaz
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Huge sound, incredible power handling. Natural, "easy" sound. Decent bass with moderate power, great bass with massive power, blends nicely with subwoofer, great "wow" factor when watching action movies.

Weakness:

Fuzzy soundstage that actually sounds nice when you get used to it.

901 series VI.
Coveting these speakers since I was a kid when I read about Bose's research on the theoretical pulsating sphere (which has considered to be the ultimate in sound reproduction) and the 901 that resulted from this research, I jumped at the chance to purchase a used pair about 11 years ago. Since then, these speakers have been powered by many different amps and even sat idle for years because my living spaces at the time were not suitable. Now, that I have my own house, they are again used, this time with a vintage 90W channel Onkyo reciever also powering a passive Paradigm subwoofer (which sounds great with the series VI active equalizer, by the way). I use this system as my "old school" surround sound, for watching TV, movies or listening to music. Although I refuse to get a modern surround sound system, it might be because I love the way these speakers sound in this use. They present a nice big comfy sound that seems to just emanate from the wall, flowing toward me like a big river, with an ethereal soundstage. Surround-sound is almost gimicky compared to the natural way the 901's work (and sound). Not totally adverse to modern times, I am planning on purchasing a flat-screen HDTV, soon. However, the 901's will stay.

My very favorite setup that these speakers have been part of, is one that I had during my days renting a house with a couple of friends. I had purchased a used DJ amp: QSC putting out about 300 watts/channel. My housemate, purchased the very same amp. Bridging the amp resullting in 1000 watts into one channel, thus using two amps gave 1000 watts per channel. We hooked up the 901s and the results were staggering! Although no other speakers were part of this setup (no subwoofers), the sound was prodigious and the speakers NEVER showed any signs of distress! The music was incredibly tight and loud. The bass was surprisingly deep and loud with impact that felt like a punch to the chest. I vividly remember playing a track of AC/DC's '74 Jailbreak for a friend of mine who actually jumped and flinched in surprise at the very first seconds of the song which started out solely with electic guitar. Those first strums filled the entire room like a rock concert. Listening to that setup was like going to the very best sounding rock concert that you could ever imagine. It really was larger than I ever expected and I have NEVER experienced a sound like that again (including actual rock concerts, which sound like garbage in comparison).

However, that setup was waaay too loud and would never pass muster with the wife...

For really big sound that sounds natural and is unfatiguing, I wholly recommend the 901's. They are very enjoyable as my "surround sound system".

My secondary system consists of an Audio Refinement Integrated Amp, vintage DBX DX-5 CD player and NHT SB-1 speakers. This system sounds totally different, with accurate imaging and soundstage. By comparison, I can understand how audiophiles can disregard the 901's, but its almost apples to oranges. The sound that 901's provide is unique enough to be in a class of their own. They may be better or worse than "normal" speakers to the listener, depending on what they are expecting.

Similar Products Used:

Really nothing else like it, for better or worse...

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Feb 15, 2008]
Fleemer
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Even, strong sound that packs a punch without boominess. All frequencies are smooth with powerful lows and sparkling highs. Not tinny or distorted. I'm using an old Kenwood 120wpc receiver, Model 11 III. I couldn't put the volume at 3 unless I want my neighbors calling 911. I'm convinced that a bad experience with these speakers is the result of today's low end electronics that have flooded the market. Maybe the new 901's have been improved to sound better with the crappy equipment that's out there but I don't know for sure. I tried mine with my new NAD 5.1 system and they lacked something in the low end for sure. My Bose 501's sound great with the NAD and a sub. The 901 with NAD needed the sub too - they were good but not great. This told me that for true great stereo sound you need a stereo amp or receiver and keep the 5.1 surround system hooked up to a sub. In other words, match the equipment carefully by design. To get great sound today using NAD - I'd need the top of the line model I think to equal the sound I get from my Kenwood. What can I say, they knew how to make good quality equipment back then and built it to last a lifetime.

Weakness:

None that I can say. A bad setup will most likely give you weaknesses. Make sure you have a good quality amp. You have to pay big bucks today to get the quality that was just expensive back in the '70's. These speakers will disappoint with a mid-range 5.1 receiver that's common. You need some quality since you have quality speakers. HIgh end NAD or McIntosh would probably fit the bill with the 901's.

Here's my debt to Bose paid in full. I say that because I bought my Bose 901's series II from somebody who didn't want them anymore and well, Bose doesn't benefit from that too much. Hopefully, my review will help fix that. I don't know how Bose has gotten a bad name in some circles with speakers like the 901's. I first heard them at a friend's house when I was 16. He put Van Halen down on the turntable and with his Kenwood amp, proceeded to knock me out of the room with the first 30 seconds of the first cut. I've never forgotten that. I was amazed. Since that time, I've heard demos of hundreds of speakers. I could never afford the Bose speakers I wanted. Never had the right room size either for the 901's. I've owned some good speakers (I thought) but then was never completely satisfied with the sound. Fast forward to today. I found some mint condition 901's some guy was selling because he didn't do much listening anymore. I took a chance that they were in good shape and that leap of faith paid off big time. Here it is, 30 years later and Van Halen never sounded so good. They still have it. Ironically, I think I got the same model and series as my friend had. Cosmetically, they are perfect and obviously built to last. These speakers do require a good sized room and proper placement. If you're not getting bass from them, you don't have them set up right. I can do side by side comparisons with my subwoofered system playing the same source and well, the subwoofer just makes things boomy. The 901's require no subwoofer, receiver does not have loudness on. Bass control is up 3 notches because I'm in a basement. If I was upstairs, I know controls would be flat or only up 1 notch. These speakers are amazing. If you turn the lights down low, or close your eyes, you can imagine the band right there in the room and the volume doesn't even have to be loud. You could listen for days without getting tired of the sound. I'm impressed with everything in my collection and I'm playing old lp's again, something I haven't done in years. Usually you buy speakers and they sound good for a while (like the old Steve Martin routine) and then they sound like #%@#. It's been a few months now and I'm as excited today about them as I was the day I bought them. In the brochure, they say they are quite probably the finest loudspeaker out there for the money. I agree - it's not bragging. The absence of a crossover network seems to be noticeable and the sound is smooth as silk. No listener fatigue. My ears don't ring later. Nothing harsh. It's all rich and smooth. I wish I could go back 30 years and get back the time lost messing with other systems. It turned out for the best however and well, it's a treat no matter what. They say they've made improvements in the Bose speakers over the years and I can't testify to that - I do recommend that folks buy the old stuff since it was the best stuff. If you can't achieve great sound with these speakers, you've made a bad choice in some component, haven't the right setup or don't know good sound when you hear it. Nobody really knows how music should sound since there are so many variables althought they claim they know. All you can know is whether or not, you feel the speakers sound good and live up to your expectations. These speakers are keepers and I don't see shopping for anything else as long as they keep giving me what I've heard so far. As someone already said, a company doensn't stay in business for 40 years unless they have something to offer that's great. No marketing scheme can keep you going that long. You hear most from people when they aren't happy. The happy satisfied customers usually don't say a thing...but here I am - sharing, happy and satisfied with my purchase and I hope you will be too.

Similar Products Used:

Bose 501

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 15, 2008]
Fleemer
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Even, strong sound that packs a punch without boominess. All frequencies are smooth with powerful lows and sparkling highs. Not tinny or distorted. I'm using an old Kenwood 120wpc receiver, Model 11 III. I couldn't put the volume at 3 unless I want my neighbors calling 911. I'm convinced that a bad experience with these speakers is the result of today's low end electronics that have flooded the market. Maybe the new 901's have been improved to sound better with the crappy equipment that's out there but I don't know for sure. I tried mine with my new NAD 5.1 system and they lacked something in the low end for sure. My Bose 501's sound great with the NAD and a sub. The 901 with NAD needed the sub too - they were good but not great. This told me that for true great stereo sound you need a stereo amp or receiver and keep the 5.1 surround system hooked up to a sub. In other words, match the equipment carefully by design. To get great sound today using NAD - I'd need the top of the line model I think to equal the sound I get from my Kenwood. What can I say, they knew how to make good quality equipment back then and built it to last a lifetime.

Weakness:

None that I can say. A bad setup will most likely give you weaknesses. Make sure you have a good quality amp. You have to pay big bucks today to get the quality that was just expensive back in the '70's. These speakers will dissapoint with a mid-range 5.1 receiver that's common. You need some quality since you have quality speakers.

Here's my debt to Bose paid in full. I say that because I bought my Bose 901's series II from somebody who didn't want them anymore and well, Bose doesn't benefit from that too much. Hopefully, my review will help fix that. I don't know how Bose has gotten a bad name in some circles with speakers like the 901's. I first heard them at a friend's house when I was 16. He put Van Halen down on the turntable and with his Kenwood amp, proceeded to knock me out of the room with the first 30 seconds of the first cut. I've never forgotten that. I was amazed. Since that time, I've heard demos of hundreds of speakers. I could never afford the Bose speakers I wanted. Never had the right room size either for the 901's. I've owned some good speakers (I thought) but then was never completely satisfied with the sound. Fast forward to today. I found some mint condition 901's some guy was selling because he didn't do much listening anymore. I took a chance that they were in good shape and that leap of faith paid off big time. Here it is, 30 years later and Van Halen never sounded so good. They still have it. Ironically, I think I got the same model and series as my friend had. Cosmetically, they are perfect and obviously built to last. These speakers do require a good sized room and proper placement. If you're not getting bass from them, you don't have them set up right. I can do side by side comparisons with my subwoofered system playing the same source and well, the subwoofer just makes things boomy. The 901's require no subwoofer, receiver does not have loudness on. Bass control is up 3 notches because I'm in a basement. If I was upstairs, I know controls would be flat or only up 1 notch. These speakers are amazing. If you turn the lights down low, or close your eyes, you can imagine the band right there in the room and the volume doesn't even have to be loud. I'm impressed with everything in my collection and I'm playing old lp's again, something I haven't done in years. Usually you buy speakers and they sound good for a while (like the old Steve Martin routine) and then they sound like #%@#. It's been a few months now and I'm as excited today about them as I was the day I bought them. In the brochure, they say they are quite probably the finest loudspeaker out there for the money. I agree - it's not bragging. The absence of a crossover network seems to be noticeable and the sound is smooth as silk. No listener fatigue. My ears don't ring later. Nothing harsh. It's all rich and smooth. I wish I could go back 30 years and get back the time lost messing with other systems. It turned out for the best however and well, it's a treat no matter what. They say they've made improvements in the Bose speakers over the years and I can't testify to that - I do recommend that folks buy the old stuff since it was the best stuff. If you can't achieve great sound with these speakers, you've made a bad choice in some component, haven't the right setup or don't know good sound when you hear it. Nobody really knows how music should sound since there are so many variables althought they claim they know. All you can know is whether or not, you feel the speakers sound good and live up to your expectations. These speakers are keepers and I don't see shopping for anything else as long as they keep giving me what I've heard so far. As someone already said, a company doensn't stay in business for 40 years unless they have something to offer that's great. No marketing scheme can keep you going that long. You hear most from people when they aren't happy. The happy satisfied customers usually don't say a thing...but here I am - sharing, happy and satisfied with my purchase and I hope you will be too.

Similar Products Used:

Bose 501's for home theatre - great stuff, new surrounds.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 198  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com