Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
chris clarke
a Audio EnthusiastDate Reviewed: March 27, 2002
Bottom Line: a great tuner takes a lot of money to beat it, quality sound
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Audio Enthusiast
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Alex Ong
a Audio EnthusiastDate Reviewed: April 1, 2000
Bottom Line: This, being my fourth tuner to date, simply never fails to make me enjoy listening to FM radio. The sound quality is involving and natural, do not sound shut-in like the other tuners that I used to owned. Only drawback is you need to own an NAD remote amp. in order to remotely control the unit. Overall this is a great tuner for the price of $260 Sin. Dollars. Last I heard that this model has been replaced by the C440.
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Audio Enthusiast
Product model year: 1998
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Calum Baxter
a Audio EnthusiastDate Reviewed: February 1, 2000
Bottom Line: I have had the Nad for a couple of years now and it never fails to impress with its punch , presentation and clarity.
I use it mainly to listen to classical music and find that the nad can pick up the smallest detail. For the price I had not heard a better tuner,although it was expensive at £280.00
The FM aerial does require accurate positioning for best results, and for this reason I have mounted one in the attic.
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Audio Enthusiast
Product model year: 1998
|
Reviews 1 - 3 (3 Reviews Total)
| |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |