REVIEW SHOP SHARE LEARN

1. REVIEWER INFORMATION

(*Mandatory fields)*Name*Email Address (must be valid to post review)
* Value Rating
(worth your money)
 
* Overall Rating
(money doesn't matter)
 
* How long have you used the product?    * Style that best describes you?

* What is the product model year?

2. PRODUCT REVIEW

* Review Summary

Characters Left

Product Image
McIntosh MR7082
2 Reviews
rating  5 of 5
MSRP 
Description: Digital Tuner


Submit

    Looking for ideas on what to say? Below are some other Reviews for you to look over.

Rating
Reviewed by:
larry
(Audiophile)

Review Date
December 18, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
3 months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from celina, ohio, usa

Price Paid:  $700.00 from individual

Summary:
this tuner is nithing short of phenominal. it makes radio stations sound like a cd. the stereo seperation will adsolutely amaze you. I have been an electronics tech. for 17 years and an audiophile for 25 years and it is the best tuner i have ever heard.................

Strengths:
dynamic range if phenominal, it is very sensitive,
and is fairly selective but really shows off with an outside antenna. even better with more than one antenna to select from

Weaknesses:
no remote, only remote with a c38 preamp

Similar Products Used:
sony, philips


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
GPD
(an Audiophile)

Review Date
September 11, 1999

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 1 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of

Summary:
Recently upgraded from a McIntosh MR78 analog tuner to the McIntosh MR7082. While the MR78 is a beautiful piece of work (see reviews), I found that it was overly warm to my ears and 'rough' on close-miked DJ's, etc. Perhaps a tour through Audio Classics alignment shop might have cured this. But, it was by far the hotest running piece of equipment I had and I decided to try something more modern - hence the MR7082. Immediately I found the sound to be much improved - no roughness on close-miked sources, considerably quieter, easier to tune. Very CD/LP sounding rather than 'radio' sounding. Did lose that wonderful analog front display on the MR78, but all other aural aspects are superior on the MR7082. And, isn't that what we are here for?


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.