Summary: This CD/SACD player is, when comparing dollar to dollar, could hardly find a competitor at this pricing.
It sounds detail, lively and with good bass presentation. For SACD the sound feels more smoother.
Strengths: 1)Solid and Rigid design to minimized the vibration.
2)Smooth tray movement.
3)Sound Clear, Detail with rich bass.
4)Having 3 sound setting to suit everyone's preference.
5)With Balanced and Unbalanced output for better sound connection.
6)SACD Playback is more smoother and detail in the mid/high region.
Weaknesses: 1)SACD only provides stereo playback, no multichannel playback capability.
2)The mid should sound more lively when compared with Ayre Cx7e and Cary 306 SACD.
Similar Products Used: Sony CDP507ESD, Sony CDP338ESD, Marantz CD6002
Would you like to Comment? Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Summary: This is one unbelievable cd, sacd player. It upgraded my system from good to outstanding., just by changing the source. Sound on redbook cd is amazing: bass is deaper, highs are clearer, sound state is wide and accurate. As good as cd soound,is SACD is at another level even higher.! I always thought my system was good, but it missed something and Sa11 provided it. Music comes to life, but in a natural sounding way. It sounds like music.
My System : Acurus A250/ Yamaha cx2. Yamaha px-3 with grace f9e. Yamaha tx950
Infinity Reference Standard II .
Strengths: natural sound like music sounds like.Not overblown . this is a player for true audiophiles, people who listen to the music not the equipment. Engages you in the music, you move your feet with the music.,,. As said in previous reviews buy it.
It is the best value in cd/sacd pleyer even at full list price. Built like a tank,weighs 30 lbs. Chassis is copper plated.looks gorgeous, all buttons link to relays..Sounds even better
Weaknesses: on SACD playpack, you can notice transport noise at the beginning of the Disc on quiet
passage or between tracks. This is my second unit, both exhibit same behavior
Similar Products Used: Marantz 63SE, retired, Rega Apollo. Rotel RCD1072,neither sounded much better than my 63se.
Would you like to Comment? Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.
Summary: Maybe one the Worst CD players I have ever owned..and I have owned some of the best.( Wadia, Sony SCD-1, Arcam 23, Linn Karick).. Has no focus..No depth ..and worst of all..Muddy..!!! Playing thru custom Horn rig, Krell Pam-1 preamp and Accuphase mono Amps...What disappointment..!!! Had Marantz CD23 which was much better than this..I don't get it ..!!! There is nothing to rave about here...Switched over to Goldmund Dac thru Old Marantz DV-8300 transport...And what an improvement..!!!!....Please reconsider before making this purchase...Give a listen if you can.....You maybe sorry..!!!!!!!
Strengths: NONE..!!! Other than nice looking player.....and killer remote...
Weaknesses: Too many to mention....!! lacks Bass..Lacks focus.. lacks depth..!! Sounds like my old portable Sony Walkman....from 15 years ago...What a true disappointment..!!!
Similar Products Used: wadia..Sony SCD-1...Linn Karick
Summary: I had been going through a series of upgrades on my two channel system as I had been not so keen on the musical performance of my system. I had been using an Arcam CD72 as my CD source and had always felt it was becoming and anchor to my system.
First listened to an Arcam CD33 and had that old phrase pop in my head “You only get a fractional improvement of sound for the multiples of dollars spent”. It was only marginally better then CD72, unconvincing of the cost of upgrade. The dealer had then placed the Musical Fidelity A5 in the system and I was quickly impressed by the player and felt that it had brought enough to the table to consider cost. The dealer also had the Cary CD303/200 in the room, which in itself proved to be quite competent, but had a different perspective over the MF. The Cary had a stronger dynamic range, while the MF provided some more midrange prominence. If I had spent a bit more time, it would have been fun picking out the difference in presentations of these two very good players.
The Marantz came out last, but had become my first choice. Bass was deep and taut, horns sound that fully rounded out, with highs coming in clearly with better dimension. Cymbals and high hats had gone from being in the mix to being there.
The fact this it was balanced made my decision easier as my Pass Labs amp and preamp would allow me to get the best of the balanced outputs.
Strengths: All the options in the filtes allows the player to get the most of your good or not quite as good recordings. SACD is a bonus, for the few titles out there.
Weaknesses: I think I would have to spend far more to find a so called one.
Would you like to Comment? Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.