|
Review NaN of
, from Denmark Summary: I cannot agree with Peter Stok's review of this fantastic product. I bought my Beocenter back in 1997. I did not have enough money for the Beolab active speakers, so I decided to use my NAD power amp. and my old KEF speakers. Firstly, I was astonished by the sound quality which was much better than my old highly awarded and expensive Sony cd player. The overall sound reproduction was much more comfortable with a deep bass and a crisp trebble but still more neutral than my NAD pre-amp. Besides that, the daily operation of the Beocenter was incredible compared to my old system. I know listen to music instead of pressing buttons and reading about technique. Further, the sound controls were much easier to use than those of the NAD pre-amp. I often had to adjust the controls of the NAD pre-amp because the sound was often rather dark with no spark. The Beocenter has that punch without sharp edges as is normal with a lot of Japanese equipment. It does not focus on any particular frequency but instead plays the cd as was intended by those who produced it. Interesting, the sound quality improved as I bought a pair of Beolab 4000 active boxes which plays low frequences even better than my NAD power amp and KEF speakers. My KEF speakers sounded unnatural compared with the Beolab because of its emphasis on the midrange. I now have a Beosound 9000 with an even better sound than the 2300. But the Beosound 9000 does not have the same value for money as the 2300. Its a bargain. A sublime unity of sound and design. Strengths: Technique, sound, price Weaknesses: none at all Similar Products Used: Sony cd-player, NAD pre- and power amps
|