|
|
|
Top Ranked Products from Marantz.
|
|
|
Rating
Reviewed by:
Nick(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date
September 23, 2001Overall Rating
 4 of 5
Value Rating
 5 of 5
Used product for
1 to 3 months |
|  | |
Review 1 of 7
Price Paid:
$200.00
from cambridge soundworks Summary:
i am using this to power my BA VRM 60 bookshelf speakers, i think that this is an excellent peice at an excellent price, i picked this up open box and it was really an impulse buy, but i am gad i bought it, and it has worked out very well, i think if it had a little more throu put i would be a little happier thou. but this is an excellent piece that is very hard to beat Strengths:
excellent display, very good sound, very good build quality Weaknesses:
not really enough power to crank in up Similar Products Used:
i have used several by denon, yamaha, pioneer, and sony
|
|
Rating
Reviewed by:
JoeL(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date
August 5, 2001Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for
3 months to 1 year |
| | |
Review 2 of 7
Price Paid:
$300.00
from Soundscape Summary:
When my 23 yr. old Tandberg went up several months ago I was leary about fixing it. Not knowing what might go up next I decided to start shopping for another receiver. I was convinced that I wouldn't be able to find anything to equal the performance of the Tandberg at a price I was willing to pay. Well I am happy to say that I was wrong. Coming in at $450 less than I was willing to pay,this receiver has surpassed even my most critical expectations. An excellent value and tremendous performer. One day I might own a Mark Levinson, but until that time I am just going to enjoy the sound of this diamond in the rough.The SR48 has convinced me that Marantz is back.
Strengths:
Understated simplicity and outstanding sound! Weaknesses:
None Similar Products Used:
Lafayette, Kenwood Kr4600,Pioneer, Tandberg 2055
|
|
Rating
Reviewed by:
Chris(Unregistered User)
(Casual Listener)
Review Date
February 9, 2001Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for
1 to 3 months |
| | |
Review 3 of 7
Price Paid:
$299.00
from Glenn Poor's Summary:
This receiver is a huge bargain if you want a decent system but don't have an audiophile's budget. You really can't go wrong with this receiver in this price range. When shopping I compared it to the NAD C-740 which was matched up to some Paradigm speakers. The Marantz has comparable audiophile qualities and solid construction. It also has a built in phono stage that the NAD lacks. I have not yet upgraded my speakers, but it does wonders powering the cheap pair of Fischer speakers I bought 10 years ago at Best Buy. I heard it demo'd on various Phase Technology Speakers, and it had a wide soundstage and very clean powerful sound, which was very accurate and not too bright or boomy. In my opinion as good as the NAD, but cheaper. Strengths:
ease of use design, clean, bright (but not too bright) sound. Power rating is conservative Weaknesses:
remote design Similar Products Used:
NAD, AIWA
|
|
Rating
Reviewed by:
Tom (Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date
January 28, 2001Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for
3 months to 1 year |
| | |
Review 4 of 7
Price Paid:
$102.00
from E-bay Summary:
I purchased this receiver a few months ago on e-bay, and i have been very happy with it. I use it with a Marantz cd changer, M&K subwoofer, and Axiom M3ti bookshelf speakers.
I also use it to drive my AKG-K.501 headphones. The 50w of power is clean, and exceptionally smooth, and that is an rms or continuous rating not measured at a peak. I believe this is a conservative rating by the way. The headphone jack appears to be of high quality also as i don't use a seperate headphone amp and never go past 9 o'clock on the volume control. The sound this receiver reproduces is sparkling and very musical. The remote control is first rate, and I think the red led on the volume control is also a nice feature. In my opionion this component offers out standing quality and value. As one reviewer noted it's like the Marantz of old...That's true. Strengths:
User friendly, Outstanding quality. Weaknesses:
The binding posts could be improved.
|
|
Rating
Reviewed by:
Lance(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date
January 11, 2001Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for
More than 1 year |
| | |
Review 5 of 7
Price Paid:
$400.00
from 2001 Audio Video Summary:
This is a solid reciever, however, it would benefit from more than 50 watts. I have used the unit for more than a year now with a pair of Angstrom Omega 26's(6 ohm) and the combination is great. The speakers are capable of accepting up to 100 watts, but I can not cause the reciever to clip out with them. On the other hand, with a beastly pair of Audio Logic speakers(8 ohm), at very high volumes (beond comfortable listening levels) the marantz will clip.
The design is clean and simple, there are no unnecessary features or buttons that get in the way.
The supplied remote control is of the highest quality and capable of controling a whole marantz system.
Some more inputs would also help, as there is only a phono, tape, tv/aux, tuner, and cd. I have my computer plugged into the tv/aux(for ease of use), and my VCR plugged into the tape monitor(because there is no better place to plug it in to. If I actually used a tape anymore, I would have no place to plug in only three inputs(computer, tape and VCR). This is only a minor problem, however.
Overall, I would recommend this unit to anyone wanting a solid easy to use stereo reciever that is not looking to blow up the world with wattage. Strengths:
Easy to use, Fine Quality Weaknesses:
could use a couple more watts for good luck
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audio and Video News & Press Releases.
|
|
|
|
Expert hi-fi audio reviews, blogs, and audio articles.
|
|
|
