above says it all

a lot of flexibility for a early 90s unit reliability adequate power

missing RCA plug and S-video and Component Vido inputs and outputs to stay up with 2003 -- on the other hand, as some reviewer said about surround sound, "Who cares". Music, I feel is the thing; reliabity is second; and good looks in my living room's "tower of power" is third.

A great receiver -- or at least the most satisfying of five I've had since 1967! I hit a fantastic deal in spring 94 at Myer-Emco middlebrow stereo emporium, which was closing out Luxman as Lux departed the U.S. market. (I was told that one of the technicians was waiting to buy it, as soon as the regular retail customer phase of Myer-Emco's sale was over! I guess fairplay rules do hold somewhere.) I've never achieved clipping, by a darn sight, but then I play mostly jazz and classical. On the other hand, I used to have teenagers living at home, and they used the Lux and its B&W DM12's a lot, so it was probably driven much more when young than I ever did. I'd a Lux CD changer (DC-114, bought in conjunction with an Alpine car unit in '92), and I picked up a K-321 cassette deck in the sale (which I think I've used for 6 hours in 8 years!). This was, and is, the core system. The three components work delightfully together, with Lux's serial and bus interconnects for the remote! I couldn't resist taking the system to analog surround sound, with a Kenwood surround sub-amp I also stumbled into; my four B&W speakers, DM 12's in front and DM 600s for rears, with an Infiniti center, all work fine with the Lux R-361, along with every other piece of AV gear I've plugged into it. (These devices include a Yamaha laser disc, JVC S-VHS and Panasonic HiFi VHS, Pioneer DVD, Sony mini-disc, for a bit a Technics CD turntable and later for a while a Lux DZ-111 seconday CD player, Sony SB-V66S S-VHS switcher, Thorens TD 160 tangential turntable and a Sony PS FL-9 linear turntable). Despite what seemed in 1995 a lot of RCA Plug and S-video connectors, the Luxman designers didn't quite catch the entire wave of the future. But which set of designers did? With a bit of planning, and the occasional outboard box like the aforementioned Sony switcher, the Lux seems to keep up with modernity as well as I want to (or as I myself do, for that matter).

Similar Products Used:

Fisher 600 (?) original issue AR amplifier Altec Lansing 714A Luxman K-405 receiver

Awesome sound, picks up lots of stations on the tuner. 3 Aux slots. The dial moves when you use the remote for volume.

I wish I had more of them

Hi there. First off, the reason I have this amp is because my father went out, maybe 7 years ago, and bought 7 Luxman amps, most were R-351s, I think one might have been an R-341. We consequently moved out of that house and because we no longer have a media room, we have 7 Luxman amps sitting in the basement. I snagged one and some of the $1000 dollar handmade speakers which we also have lying around, and made myself a little home stereo. (I also got to Sony 10-disc cd changer). This receiver is amazing. The bass pounds, but tries very hard not to drown out the highs, unless you are really pumping the heck out of dance music, and even then it''s all tight. I may be mistaken, but in the manual it said 35 watts per channel, but it feels like 150 at least. This amp is loud! I love it, I listen to all kinds of music and it makes me realize how much my other steroes suck. Overall, this amp may be old school, but it blows away the competiton unless you are planning on spending thousands on a new amp today.

Similar Products Used:

R-341

Many connections available. Flexibility. Good control of unit with remote.

Nice receiver with lots of connects and flexibility. Plenty of power. I no longer have this unit but it sounded pretty good. Tuner section was pretty good at picking up stations.

I found the vintage L-580 Luxman really sounded very much better than this unit. I have heard that the L-580 is a class A receiver however so that would explain it. Actually in my opinion all of the L series Luxmans sound better than this but these are an earlier period in Luxman history than the R-361. They have a warmer sound than the R-361.

Absolutely no comparrison in sound quality with any class A amps or even the Luxman M02 but the M02 is a power amp costing about the same as the R-361 new.

Given the price you find the R-361 for when it rarely appears for sale it is a good deal. In my area I cannot find anyone willing to work on Luxman equipment though that just might be because its Atlanta.

By the way if you are looking for a terrific sounding amp for lots cheaper than Krell you should check out the Madrigal / Citation 7.1. That is an incredible piece of equipment. The difference between the R-361 and the L-580 or Citation amps is that as you turn up the R-361 it gets louder but your fatigue goes up, not so with a better grade of amp ... it gets louder but also more rich without really noticing the volume change.

Similar Products Used:

Luxman L450, L470, M02, L580, Madrigal/Citation 7.1, 5.1

Since there seems to be a lack of reviews on Luxman products here, I decided to submit one, as I can't be the only one in the world using this product. I realize that this is a lengthy review, but if you're like me, you wouldn't be reading these reviews if you didn't want the information, so I will try to be informative.
This receiver is getting pretty old, I guess. Originally introduced in 1991 at a retail of $1100, I was fortunate enough to snag one new for $600. I have recently seen one advertised here for $200, and I would consider this a steal for anyone who needs a good non-Dolby Pro Logic or Dolby Digital receiver. It is conservatively rated at 100 watts RMS per channel at 8 ohms, but has a "dynamic" rating of 350 per/ch at 2 ohms. My unit is black, although I think Luxman made some with the champagne finish. This receiver is pretty large, nearly 6 inches tall and 17-1/4" wide, 18-1/2" deep. So deep, in fact, that I had to attach a board across the back of the entertainment unit to rest the back feet on. It weighs in at a respectable 37.7 pounds.

I like the large (about 1" wide by 5/8" high) source buttons, well-spaced with a red LED indicator above them. The volume control is also large and is motor-driven by the remote control to eliminate the noise often present in electronic volume controls. And you like lots of inputs? This baby has CD, TV, Laserdisc, Audio/Video 1, Audio/Video 2, Aux 1, Phono/Aux 2, VCR 1, VCR 2, Tape 1, and Tape 2. An electronic button lets you select between using the rear panel or the front panel jacks for Audio/Video 2. This front jack has left/right audio, composite video, and S-Video jacks. There are also S-Video inputs on the rear for Laserdisc and VCR 1, as well as S-Video outputs for VCR 1 and 2, and for a TV/Monitor. The R-361 has two in/out processor loops: One Main In/Pre Out loop and one Signal Processor loop. It also offers a set of fixed audio outputs so you could feed the signal to another receiver, perhaps in another room. Speaking of other rooms, there is a telephone-type jack on the back that connects to a special in-wall keypad that lets you operate the receiver from other locations.

This unit has Luxman's "BUS LINK" and "SERIAL OUT" type connectors, two different ways of linking Luxman components together, but although I have a Luxman F-114 surround sound decoder/amp with these serial jacks, I have never been able to find a benefit for it. I suppose it works only with certain other components, like CD players and cassette decks.

A feature I like on the tuner is the ability to set both AM and FM stations on the same bank of presets and the tuner switches automatically. It will also switch the source button to TUNER if you press a preset while in another source mode.

There are 4 AC outlets, 2 switched, 2 unswitched.

The remote control is pretty well laid out. All the buttons are small and uniform in size. You can perform pretty much all the functions as on the front panel. There is an adjustable sleep timer function that shuts off the system. This can be set for up to 90 minutes in 10-minute increments and the remaining time is displayed in 1-minute increments on the front panel. The control will operate some Luxman CD and cassette decks too. The volume control operation is very smooth. The one thing that bugs me is why this receiver has separate buttons for POWER ON and POWER OFF. It is difficult to find universal remotes that will work because they all have one POWER button that simply toggles. You usually have to get a learning remote and try to progam some unused button to turn the unit on. But then you need a remote that hass more than one macro button, so you can turn the whole system ON with one macro and OFF with another.

This unit has CD syncronized recording; when used with a Luxman CD and cassette deck, pressing one button will start the CD player and the deck starts recording. It is easy to dub across virtually any source, CD to tape, CD to VCR, VCR1 to VCR2, VCR2 to VCR1, etc. due to the record out selector that displays this information on your TV screen (if you use the composite video out). Volume UP and DOWN is also displayed on-screen.

But how does it sound? Pretty good, I think. I have a set of Dahlquist DQ10s and they aren't known for their sensitivity, but the Luxman seems to drive them quite well, as well as a 15" passive subwoofer that I run on the B output.

All in all, this is a wonderful receiver.

Excellent receiver. Strong support for demanding bass sound without clipping. I have had the receiver for 8yrs with no problems, it performs perfectly.

Great Sound, Clean and Flat

No Surround Sound Built in

I opted for this uni over the 371 w/built in surround sound for the 361 and the Luxman 116 Surround Sound Processor for more enhanced capabilities. Great highs excellent bass. I have had this receiver for about 8 years it has never clipped. Alpine's home line.

An A+ Receiver for an audiophile. Awesome tuner, quiet amp, plenty of power, inputs

none...except the Tuner preset buttons.. nobody's perfect

First.. I am a low end audiophile but I do not like tube amps. I'd have to change the tubes everyday to make sure I was getting the most out of the rascal, and then I would be paranoid. That said..if you see a Luxman R361 on ebay..buy it.. you will love it. My eight years with mine has been a joy. This is an audiophiles acceptable A/V controller This is one of the few receivers a golden ear will tolerate. I run a Sony ES CD through it and some HiFi vcr's. It is not warm but warmer than the competition. With Maggie's you won't care. If you can, get an F116 Dolby_Prologic and loop it in.
You will ignore your MagnumDynalab and Goldmund tuners..that receiver tuner is so very close to my favorite, the Luxman T117 and you get the remote and the multiple inputs and recording out conveniences. Luxman's FM "computer analyzed tun(ing)" is for real..their FM has separation and soundstage with quiet. Matched with the good amps, it just sounds great. If you have a station that cares about transmission you can tape off the air and be so very pleased. I have the old Minneapolis Cities 97 on HiFi VCR.. About 24-6's. All are as fresh and clean as an old CD but warmer. I love that tuner, the amp and the switches and remote..what else is there? God forbid if it needs repair tho'...shop around carefully and get testimonials. Be prepared to maybe ship it to New York if you really care about it. That receiver can do expensive speakers justice. I contend you will be happiest with it driving a pair of big Magnepan's (restored IIIb or newer). The following might get tiring: you could do Five NHT Super One's or the five B&W of your choice (there are a lot of great little 2-ways) and a Velodyne 18 subwoofer. Spica's are great too.. TC-50 ..try to get five for center and surround and add a sub. Vandersteen's? maybe.This may be the end of the road of your quest..'until you win the lottery and want $10,000 sound in every room, rooms big enough to hold Wilson's or Maggies.
I have not had an Acurus or AR or Bryston, etc but I did have some Carver and Adcom and Harmon. The Carver was OK the Adcom amp did not sound good. I did like the Adcom dumb pot and pre-amps. Harmon solid state amps sound good to me. I use the bottom half of an H-K 730 Twin on occasions..it's not bad.. But I am happy with my Luxman. You will be too. I think if H-K would improve quality of parts and construction, they could compete with Luxman...raise their prices and compete. But they may NEVER knock off a Luxman tuner.."computer analyzed tuner"... marketing or not, I am hooked.
Since I have a forum, I will digress on another important listener issue. Two speaker listening should have been squashed years ago... along with two mic recording. With the advent of Dolby Pro-Logic and AC-3 ..and Lexicon etc, get that center speaker singing to you..the way music was supposed to come at you. Quit spending your travel money trying to get decent sound from.. only a right and a left speaker! Enjoy your listening.

Similar Products Used:

Luxman R-106 Luxman R-1050 HarmonKardon 730 Twin HarmonKardon 330c Adcom pre-amp/Citation 12 or Carver 1.0t or H-K A1? tube amp