Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (35 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
User Reviews
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
Leonard van der Est
a AudioPhileDate Reviewed: August 21, 2012
Bottom Line: I agree with the previous fellow, a complete dud. Still have a NAD 3155 that I had bridged with a 2155 for 30 years. The C372 after 3 years blew a capacitor on start up from cold, and in a well ventilated installation, it never seemed quite right after repair on warranty. NAD even has the nerve to say they would not warranty the C 372 for this reason. Though they did mine, it just didn't sound as good as when new. After 7 years one of the resistors on the right side main amp came loose. The solder was stuck to the resistor pin but no longer to the circuit board. $250 later, I will admit they halved the price of the capacitors they replaced or it would have been about $450, it worked for about 2 weeks, they are now looking at the volume control.. My profession before retireing was a marine engineer. I understand very well when a cascading event starts, passing on to another part then another and so on. At this point I can no longer follow there reasoning in paying more for repairs than the cost of a new amp. I purchased a Harmon Kardon 3490 and am very pleased with this reciever.
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: AudioPhile
Product model year: 2005
Overall Rating: Value Rating:
Submitted by
paul hoyle
a Casual ListenerDate Reviewed: October 26, 2011
Bottom Line: this thing is a poor quality dud & for the price is a joke as such. I was under the false illusion that a name like nad came with quality but was a wrong> The left channels went & later the right channels went with very little use. In short dont touch it or for that matter nad products in genral not impressed at all!
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Casual Listener
Product model year: 2008
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
wwt123
a Audio EnthusiastDate Reviewed: January 3, 2011
Bottom Line: I am having C372 for just more than a year. matched quite right with my PSB speakers but the volume control trigger some distortion everytime when i adjust the volume. i has sent to the service centre for repair but the can not refuse the defects. for sure, i isolated the problem by using my friend's amp to test my speakers by using the same setting, same CD player, same CD. No distortion was detected. This make me very sad. I have to stay with the volume distortion forever.
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Audio Enthusiast
Product model year: 2009
Overall Rating:
Value Rating:
Submitted by
merid
a AudioPhileDate Reviewed: November 8, 2010
Bottom Line: This amp does not even come close to other NAD product offerings. It was bested by a long shot by my old NAD C320BEE at 50 watts driving my PSB Synchrony Two's. I upgraded to the C375BEE for a bit more money and WORLD of difference. The C375BEE is a bargain and definately the best I have heard in my many systems. It's the best NAD amp I have ever heard. There must be something with the BEE designation, which the C372 does not have as a designation. Also, the C375 is spec'd at 150 watts like the C372, but reading the specs shows a fair amount of difference in output.
Used product for: Less than 1 month
Duration Product Used: AudioPhile
Product model year: 2009
Overall Rating: Value Rating:
Submitted by
gruff5054
a Audio EnthusiastDate Reviewed: March 20, 2009
Bottom Line: My c372 went up in smoke 6 months after the warrenty expired. Not good for an amp of this supposed quality and price. Nad did repair it free of charge. When I got it back I found it had also destroyed my new ($1800) speakers. The damage to the speakers was not covered by the speaker warrenty. Less than a year later the amp has again has gone up in smoke. It has never been abused driven hard or abused in anyway at all. If I have to pay to get it repared this time I will choose to buy anpther brand.
Used product for: More than 1 year
Duration Product Used: Audio Enthusiast
Product model year: 2007
|
Reviews 1 - 5 (35 Reviews Total)
|
| Next 15 |
Review Options:
Sorted by Latest Review | Sort by Best Rating |
