|
|
MSRP:
$ 899.00
2 x 150W minimum continuous power into 4/8 ohms, 220W/340W/460W IHF dynamic power into 8/4/2 ohms
2 x 150W minimum continuous power into 4/8 ohms, 220W/340W/460W IHF dynamic power into 8/4/2 ohms respectively, bridgeable to 400W mono (8 ohms), A/B speaker outputs with remote switching, headphone socket, high current Holmgren toroidal power transformer, relay input switching, 7 Line inputs including two tape in/outs, all discrete circuitry, short signal path from input to output, all sockets gold plated, Bass and Treble controls with Tone Defeat switch, main amp input and 2 preamp outputs, NAD Soft Clipping, IR input and output, full system remote control including stand-by/off, 12V trigger output, remote control, detachable power cord.
More Integrated Amplifiers from NAD >>
Search AudioReview forums for the NAD C372 >>
|
|
Popular Integrated Amplifiers
|
|
|
| more... |
|
|
Top Ranked Products from NAD.
|
|
|
Rating Reviewed by:
 gruff5054
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date March 20, 2009Overall Rating
1 of 5
Value Rating
1 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 3.67 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 1 of 31
Price Paid:
$0.00 Summary: My c372 went up in smoke 6 months after the warrenty expired. Not good for an amp of this supposed quality and price. Nad did repair it free of charge. When I got it back I found it had also destroyed my new ($1800) speakers. The damage to the speakers was not covered by the speaker warrenty. Less than a year later the amp has again has gone up in smoke. It has never been abused driven hard or abused in anyway at all. If I have to pay to get it repared this time I will choose to buy anpther brand.
|
|
Rating Reviewed by:
 dovdovits
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date November 25, 2008Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 3.67 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 2 of 31
Price Paid:
$1400.00
from Sydney Summary: Just want to add that Iin Oct 2008, my 4-year old 372 'blew up' late one night after having been left on at low volume (1/4 on the dial). No problem - I took it in to the NAD agents (Sydney, Australia) and they were most sympathetic and helpful, obviously recognising the issue. I had thought that they would knock me back due to being out of warranty, but no, the amp was repaired the same day at no cost. Of course it is part of the well known syndrome affecting some of these amps, but all credit to NAD for responding so rapidly to defuse what could have been an unpleasant situation as I wasn't going to slink away without putting up a decent fight. Importantly, the ventilation around my amp is more than adequate (4 years later!) so the problem had to be with the machine. I have owned NAD eqpt all my life really, starting with a 3020 and will continue to do so. Just a qucik remark on performance of the 372: I have always been happy with the 372 but a tad disappointed with the bass reproduction - now that it has a new power board and other gizmos (I am no audio-nut) it is performing better than ever and I am absolutely thrilled with the smoother, meatier, more sensual and tighter way in which the bass is handled by my Krix Euphonix floor-standing speakers in a bright, small room. A happy and relieved customer indeed. Strengths: power, mid-range, price Weaknesses: volume control
|
|
Rating Reviewed by:
 alexxbadea
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date November 13, 2008Overall Rating
2 of 5
Value Rating
2 of 5
Used product for Less than 1 month Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
2.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 3 of 31
Price Paid:
$0.00 Summary: Had this amplifier fiour about 4 days for testing from the local dealer.I must say i agreee with some of the guys on audioreview.Something is totally wrong with this amplifier.It has a huge lack of bass and the sound image is very blurr and unclear.I now own the c355bee wich as power is much weaker than the c372 and surprisingly better sounding and seems more powerfull.Also the tone controls are practically usless.Hope Nad will see the problems on the c372 .(every brand has it's ups and downs ) Strengths: Great Build Weaknesses: Lack of bass,very unclear sound,just not ok Similar Products Used: Nad c355bee,Marantz,Grundig Finearts,Kenwood
|
|
Rating Reviewed by:
 dada
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date April 14, 2008Overall Rating
5 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 3.67 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 4 of 31
Price Paid:
$699.00
from dmc Summary: Great amp,beautiful soundstage,very smooth,it took a while for it to break in,at first it was sounding a little harsh,but after a month or so it just smoothed out and keeps sounding better and better,speaker selection is also very important,if you dont like the sound,try changing your speakers,i have run NHT,and HK fifty,good biwire jumpers changed the sound as well. great amp under $2000. Strengths: power,precise,clear,after break inn. Weaknesses: long break inn. Similar Products Used: onkyo integra IA,old HK IA.
|
|
Rating Reviewed by:
 kanishka
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date April 5, 2008Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for 3 Months to 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 5 of 31
Price Paid:
$800.00
from Dubai Summary: Very neutral sounding amplifier. Authoritive and controlled bass. Pleasent treble. Great value for money. I tried this with a tube pre and the sound just perfect. Strengths: Sound, power. Weaknesses: none for the price. Similar Products Used: Marantz
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audio and Video News & Press Releases.
|
|
|
|
Expert hi-fi audio reviews, blogs, and audio articles.
|
|
|