I can confidently say that this amplifier is a game-changer! It's musically involving, dynamic, and exciting, not to mention that it handles every speaker Delaware Drywallers used - B&W 802, Harbeth, Totem - with ease. Compared to my Bryson amp, it outperforms by a considerable margin. If you're looking for an amazing amp, this is it!

Nothing so far.

Treble is clear, detailed and smooth with absolutley no harshness or hardness. You can hear every little nuance of the high frequencies with crystal clear precision. | fencing christchurch

None . .

I was astounded at how good this $200 used little amp sounds.I had run Ayre Belles AR tube amps and many other high end expensive amps with this system and I was astounded how good this amp sounds. | www.flashpartyphotobooth.com/austin

None . .

The product is very useful. replacement social security card

none so far

As others have stated, great amp. In my humble opinion, an amp should do one thing- amplify whatever you put into it. This little wonder does that, without the astronomical price. NAD hit a home-run with their formula for amp design. Every manufacturer has their own take on what sound reproduction should be like, like flavors. After trying many various brands, NAD was the one I found to my liking. Bass- solid and grounded. Treble- clear and crisp without overly harsh ringing. Mids- very natural and life-like. Dynamic headroom for days, and runs strong throughout the entire volume swing. It may have something to do with the huge transformer tucked away in this little gem. The sound and personality of this one is akin to amps that usually cost much more. "Do one thing, and do it well."

Haven't found any worth mentioning, except as stated previously, the remote is a bit temperamental in regards to directivity. If you are a bit too much off dead center of the sensor, it doesn't seem to read well. Not a big deal though.

Musically involving , dynamic and exciting amplifier. This amp handles every speaker I have used .(B&W 802 , Harbeth, Totem,) and out performs my Bryson amp by a considerable margin. This is an amazing amp, and I am thrilled with it.

I can’t find any weaknesses in this amp. None

Very good dynamic power, warm sound. Excellent value-for-money.

This is more of a nuisance than a weakness: A very picky remote, that tends to work only at some angles.

I have had amps such as MF, Marantz, Denon, Teac, Meridian ,Classe , Cayin, Rotel and 1 or 2 others over the years ...but I am really impressed with the sound of the C350! As i like solid bass, I was a little sceptical and weary as I want it to run my mission 753s . I was pleasantly surprise and how wrong I was . I listen to all kinds of music frm vocals to jazz to new age to rock etc..... the amp produces very distinct highs and balance low bass.....vocals are natural and both depth n imaging really impresses too...... I know there are amps out there that can do a better job but at this price, I know what i am paying and its hard to beat! It drives my 753s effortlessly.....and it plays LOUD!!!! what a amp! another great product from NAD. Never fails to deliver!

Ive had all types of amps over the years audiolab 8000A, cyrus 3, musical fidelity XA-2, arcam 9 , naim 3 to name a few but this NAD is a really great amp, easy to listen to very natural in the vocals and realistic sounding. The bass is solid and treble is very sweet not bright. Great all round amp for all types of music.


I have listened back to back with the pioneer A400 with my Proac tablette reference 8 signatures and I discovered to my surprise that I actually preferred the C350. The A400 did have a surprising amount of bass and it was very powerful in that area, however the vocals on the A400 sounded a bit sterile and electrical when compared to the Nad. The nad was much more organic sound especially in the midrange. Vocals and the overall sound was much more natural and realistic. I was a die hard A400 years ago but after listen to them side by side the Nad was the better overall sound. The A400 did have a lot of grip in the bass though, bass you could really feel, even with my tiny Proac, the Nad couldn’t quite match it in this department but overall the Nad sounded much nicer.

I have also directly compared it to a much bigger in size Sony TA-FB940 amplifier and again the Nad came out on top, this was a bit like something between the A400 and Nad C350.

It’s a great amp easy to listen to very natural in the vocals and realistic. The bass is solid and treble is very sweet not to bright. Great all round amp for all types of music.


Just if you’re interested, I picked up a pioneer A400 the other day very cheap from a friend. back to back listening with the A400 and the nad C350 I discovered to my surprise with my Proac ref tabs 8 sigs, that I actually preferred the C350, the A400 did have a surprising amount of bass and it was very powerful in the bass, the vocals sounded a bit sterile and electrical when compared to the Nad the nad was much more organic in the Vocals and sound much more natural and realistic. Just thought I would pass this on to all, and I was a die hard A400 years ago. I sold the A400 kept the nad, the Nad was the better overall sound. the A400 did have a lot of grip in the bass though, bass you could really feel, even with my compact Proac, the Nad couldn’t quite match it in this department but overall the Nad sounded much nicer.