|
Review NaN of
, from Canada Summary: Hello friends!!! I recently had the chance to listen to the Mark Levinson 332, a Krell FPB200, and my Exposure 4 which I am considering to upgrade because I need a more powerful amp., and not bec.it didn't sound good. Among the three I rank Krell-FPB200 1st, Exposure 4 2nd and ML332 last of the three. Three of us listened and we all gave the same verdict!!! One of us used to own a ML331. We were all very very disappointed with the 332. Instruments are detailed in 332 but everything was playing so loudly at the same time that you get confused, no focus. There is no emotion and involvement. Sounded cold, as if the performer sings just for the sake of singing. We were just plainly listening. Unlike the Krell200, it really gets you involved and surrounds you with music as if you were a part of it. I liked the looks of the 332 and weight, but I won't buy it. It seems that I will settle for the Krell FPB-200 upgrade. These amps. are all in prime conditions. Strengths: power, weight 150lbs, looks impressive, but that's about it! detailed. Weaknesses: LOTS:uninvolving, impersonal, flat, emotionless, cold, far,highs and mids are not smooth Similar Products Used: Exposure 4, and Krell FPB-200 amplifiers. Classe CDT-1 transport and Timbre TT-1 DAC with Music Reference tube pre-amp.
|