REVIEW SHOP SHARE LEARN

1. REVIEWER INFORMATION

(*Mandatory fields)*Name*Email Address (must be valid to post review)
* Value Rating
(worth your money)
 
* Overall Rating
(money doesn't matter)
 
* How long have you used the product?    * Style that best describes you?

* What is the product model year?

2. PRODUCT REVIEW

* Review Summary

Characters Left

Product Image
Audio Research VT50
7 Reviews
rating  5 of 5
MSRP  2995.00
Description: 45 WPC Vacuum Tube Power Amplifier


Submit

    Looking for ideas on what to say? Below are some other Reviews for you to look over.

Rating
Reviewed by:
John LaPorta
(AudioPhile)

Review Date
October 6, 2002

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 4 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from Long Beach, CA

Price Paid:  $0.00

Summary:
After auditioning many amplifiers I have found absolute magic w/ the little 45 watt ARC VT-50. This amp continues to blow me away. The inner detail and dynamics coupled with the large sound stage really present the music in a realistic fashion. The amplifier is definitely on the neutral side and is very sensitive to source components, cables and speakers. If you are going to use a cheap cd player or skimp on your cables you will definitely not hear the VT-50's full potential. I am curently running a Wadia 860X balanced (the only wat to go w/ the Wadia/ARC combo) w/ spectacular results. I have also tried many different speakers with the VT-50 (mini-monitors) and have found the ultimate match w/ the ProAc 1SC monitors. I have heard that ProAc voices their speakers to ARC and gear and now I know why. Do yourself a favor a audition a VT-50. ARC recently discontinued the VT-50 due to the fact that it was expensive to manufacture as well as the fact that most people are purchasing the VT-100 instead. Since ARC supports all of the equipment they have ever manufactures this is really not an issue. Think of the VT-50 as the baby brother to the VT-100. Absoultely amazing amplifier!

Strengths:
Read above. Build quility is over the top and you have ARC around to support your investment. Fully balanced, dual mono design.

Weaknesses:
A bit tricky to bias

Similar Products Used:
Mark Levinson, VTL, Cary, McCormack, etc.


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
Joe
(Audiophile)

Review Date
July 3, 2001

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
3 months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
4.50 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from Dallas, TX

Summary:
This amp was my first personal introduction into tubes. Wow, what a performance! Once I heard it, I instantly knew it was better than any other amp I have had in my system. I have since let go of my Jeff Rowland amp in favor of this one. I have heard that there are some negatives with tubes, such as higher noise and lower quality bass, but I can't complain about this amp. It is very quiet! The bass may not be quite as tight as the Rowland, but it comes very close and is not objectional whatsoever. The bass is not lacking either. The overal smoothness is wonderful, and this amp has a dimensional quality that just envelopes me. The sound has a more natural tone to it, it sounds like music and not like electronics! I really like this amp! At 45 wpc, it may not be powerful enough for some speakers, but it's no slouch either, and will probably drive most speakers to reasonable levels. This amp is recommended!

Strengths:
Fantastic overall sound!

Weaknesses:
Tube bias adjustments.

Similar Products Used:
Jeff Rowland, Threshold, Classe.


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
Rex
(Audio Enthusiast)

Review Date
August 8, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.00 of 5, 2 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from Palo Alto

Price Paid:  $1900.00

Summary:
I got the amp a year ago and have been very happy with the amp. It gives an outstanding crystal clear sound and made me hear detail that I never knew existed on the CD before. Staging is excellent but not expansive. The only down side is that base is not as massive in quantity, but the quality of base is tight and satifying. Would highly recommend for audiophile listening.

Strengths:
Clarity for detail. Staging. Low background noise.

Weaknesses:
Base is not as deep as good solid state amps.


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
Randy Lennan
(Audiophile)

Review Date
January 1, 2000

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
3.67 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from Lee's Summit, MO, USA

Summary:
Over the years I've owned or auditioned most of the high end brands out there (including the classics) as I had a high end store for awhile. I've owned so much (including ARC) because I could never get the sound "right" for more than a few months. I'm sure most of you know what I mean. The closest I got to audio perfection was a Counterpoint, Linn, Marantz 8b, Maggie combo long ago. I essentially "gave up" on high end for a few years as the industry was in a serious funk sound-wise. Enter the ARC VT50. This inexpensive little amp still amazes me after almost 2 years now! If there is a quieter amp out there I haven't heard it. Its intertransient silence and inner detail is fantastic. Even with lots of stuff happening it is very easy to pick out individual instrument lines and voicing. And since it's dual mono, the imaging is the best ever in a ARC. You will easily hear differences in cables, taps, front ends, etc. Note: This amp sounds very different on its various taps and is much better balanced over single-ended. In balanced mode the noise drops and inner detail just goes totally 3-D. The taps can take you from bright (4 ohm) to very old style tube (16 ohm) with the turn of a wrench. Mids and highs are detailed, sweet and totally non-fatiguing in my setup. Bass is tight and controlled on a CLS. Highly recommended!

Ancillary equipment: Theta Miles (balanced) straight in to amp, MIT wires all around, Martin Logan CLS2Z

Strengths:
Clarity, imaging, liquid and fatigue-free sound

Weaknesses:
Tube biasing procedure sucks


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.

Rating
Reviewed by:
eichler
(Audiophile)

Review Date
December 14, 1999

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 3 votes

Rate this review?

Review NaN of , from chicago

Summary:
I bought this as a dealer's demo for a half it's retail price.
Out of the box, it reminded me of an older ARC amp I had many moons ago.
The amp has the newer ARC sound - more controlled bass than the D76/D150 era, fairly clean midrange & very easy highs.
I replaced all of the tubes maybe 6 months later with 1960's era NOS Amperex 7308's (a low noise, matched triode version of the 6922) and Mullard KT88's (made by GEC).
The difference was night and day. There is incredible detail without masking this as an added harshness. The amp, to use a cliche that I have heard over & over agin but never beleived, did make me pull out all my favorite CD's to listen to them again. Friends who don't know about tube equipment and give you a hard time are blown away.
This amp is not the darling of the ARC line, but with a tube replacement can really be quite a joy. If you can find it mint or demo on eBay or in RAM, jump on it - it will be a steal.

Strengths:
Classic ARC sound, but cleaner & lower in distortion

Weaknesses:
ARC uses crappy Russian 6922's & 6550's


Would you like to Comment?
Join audioReview for a free account, or Login if you are already a member.