Acurus DIA-100 Amplifiers

Acurus DIA-100 Amplifiers 

DESCRIPTION

100 watts per channel continuous, both channels driven into 8 Ohms, 20 Hz - 20,000 Hz at no more than 0.09% THD.

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 46  
[Mar 11, 2014]
Bob
Audio Enthusiast

I had to write a review for this integrated....
This is an excellent value. I ahve owned alot of stuff in the past from Krell to Audio Research to Pass and B & W and Totem Acoustic speakers...I dont have alot of $$$$ right now for a system and I bought this used over the net, and I must say I really like it..I listen to Baroque strings, Corelli, Purcell, you know, minimalist string quartets, qunitets...and I love this thing...it is nuetral, maybe a tad bright, but if the recording is good, not so, it is just right. The bass is suficient, not stellar, but there is a three dimensional soundstage on the right recordings, when the recordings are good, this thing is a smoking integrated. I have kept this unit longer than others I buy...because I think it is an outstanding performer for the price, but for any price really. It gets the music right. I swap out other tube and hybrid amps, but I always come back to this thing. It is a great unit for me anyway.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 30, 2012]
Supercoolguy
Audio Enthusiast

This amp is something i may never part with. Its rare and sounds great. Just plain solid the way good audio outta be. Its sound is potent across the board. may be a little grainy in there so it does need a good source. Im an orig owner for 16yrs. I bought the first edition then within a few months they offered an upgrade to MkII for $100 and i jumped.

....this amp has me smiling. I can get a $4k McIntosh 2chn for a fantastic deal, new in the box BUT WHY rush, i have this.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Aug 07, 2011]
karister99
AudioPhile

This is an awesome sounding integrated amp, an excellent value. I've been using this on and off. This amp provides ample power for my requirements and this is a very musical amp with lots of character to it. Very detail with a deep, broad & huge sound-stage to it. This Acurus can handle any power hungry speaker with ease and has very tight hard hitting low end with smooth and silky vocals and highs. It never runs hot and very well built. I think Acurus gear had been a great bargain due to their reliability built quality with awesome sound quality. I think the previous reviewer made a great point, you'll need to be around 2-3k price range to get the same sound quality of this amp.

This is a very solid performer and if you ever have the opportunity of getting one in the used market in good shape, do not hesitate you'll come to love their sound for a long time. I've had used Acurus (A250) , B & K, Adcom, Nakamichi, Sansui, Luxman, Pioneer, Integra, Yamaha, Theshold and Rotel and this one is an awesome little amp.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 04, 2011]
sound_junky
AudioPhile

This is by far the most sound you will get under $2500....PERIOD!! I have owned amps that I have spent $3000 on and this Acurus DIA 100 stomps it! All around an "AWESOME AMP"and this has them all shaking their boots!! You would be crazy to spend more on seperates and not give this a try first!! You wil love this amp!! I spent $3500 recently to better it!!

Read the reviews and then have a listen!.go here...
http://www.stereophile.com/integratedamps/1193acurus/
Stereophile rated a solid CLASS B!!!


Enough said!!!

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Aug 10, 2009]
1ofa1000answers
Audio Enthusiast

I've used a variety of set-ups, most of which I thought were good. On a whim I purchased the DIA-100 for my second system basically to cut down on the space occupied by 2 NAD amps and an ADCOM pre-amp. The difference was more remarkable than I would have expected. I'm using a part of M&K SB1 Satellites and they now sound better than my primary system (it sounds sluggish by comparison).

The sounds is a bit bright but the M&K's actually allow you to tweak the sound, and with some trial and error I finally found the sweetspot. The biggest drawback to the integrated amp is that there is no separate subwooder out.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[May 21, 2008]
MrT
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

SOUNDSTAGE, imaging, excellent bass control, build quality and foremost PRICE (1000 $ retail was a bargain - 500 used is great)

Weakness:

Reveals even a minor flaw in the rest of yor setup. Get yourself a good cd player.

This is for the mkII, wich I have owned for about one years and have used with a variety of components such as Arcam CD72T, Marantz CD 6000 OSE, a few Sony ES cd players and speakers by Monitor Audio, Kef, TDL and Mission (Van den Hul cables)

Many reviews here note the fact that the DIA-100, being a direct input amp, really reveals the weekest link in your system, why matching is everything. It reproduces the sound of your cd player with great accuracy. In fact, the true strength of the DIA-100 is its ability to reproduce music totally "uncolored" with great imaging and a truly impressive soundstage! But beware if your cd player is on the lower end, then you surely will have to upgrade.

After having owned about 30 amps in about the same price range I have now settled for the DIA-100 mkII. I stongly recommend it to anyone who want to spend around 500 bucks on a used amp. You will not get anything better!

Similar Products Used:

Amps: Linn, Sony ES, Arcam, Rega, Copland, NAD, Marantz, Sansui, Pioneer Elite, Dared (tube) etc

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Jun 12, 2007]
Chris W.
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Great, clean sound. SOLID build. Looks great.

Weakness:

Limited functionality.

I have this amp powering a set of vintage Acoustat Model II electrostatic speakers. They require 100W a piece, so the amp is putting out just enough power. I'm very happy with it so far. The sound is very, very clean. And the detail is great. If you can find them cheap, especially the Mk. II's, definetely go for it.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Feb 17, 2006]
sellerjb
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Crisp, clear and articulate - a great value, I've seen them sold on eBay for less than $400.

Weakness:

Nothing fancy here - old fashioned, solid state, stripped down to the bear essentials type gear. For a no-nonsense direct input amp this is the way to go. It is 100% unadulterated amplification – nothing more or less.

This is a great piece of audio equipment - it is solid and basically indestructible...it worked beautifully with Linn Keilidhs, Harmonic Technology interconnects and Marantz CD63 SE. I spent over 3 years with this set up - it's beeen great.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
[Nov 06, 2005]
hblee
AudioPhile

This is a tweak report on Acurus Dia-100 Dia-100 was my first hi-fi amp. I now have several other amps (TR and tube) that cost several times more, but I still keep it. It is my first love, and does not gobble up electricity nor tube life. My ealier tweak is posted earlier (auricap and capacitor adds). After I acquired the DIA-100 schematic from the Yahoo acurus user group (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/acurusowners/), I modified the following. 1. R2 (1K) signal-in resistor is changed to Kiwame 1K 2. R19 (68K) is replaced with Audio Note Tantal 68K. R19 is on the feedback path. 3. Feedback sound shaping (Feedback Onset) C6 (0.47 uF) and C7 (220 uF Non Polar) is replaced with 2 uF Solen and 470 uF Blackgate Non polar. 4. C1 and C2 input coupling caps are gone. It is now linked with good hookup wire (LAT). Actually, I took them out several years ago when I noticed my DAC is output capacitor coupled. 5. Power supply caps for each rail (+60V, -60V) is augmented with 6800uF, and 4700 uF, and most importantly with 220 uF Blackgate for each power supply lines to each channgel. So, I used 4 Blackgates. I actually cut the +V, and -V power lines to each channel in the middle and inserted the blackgates. In this way the Black gates are closest to the load (PCB) I know the sound of Kiwame, Tantal resistors and blackgates. Kiwame is warm, lush, no noise but lacks sparkling. Tantals make pretty sound that is best from voice to high frequency but attenutes the bass. Blackgates simply makes no noise. So the overall noise floor drops making one to hear minute details without "sh" sound. Dia-100 has huge unused space inside. So all these extra components can go in. DIA-100 is now up there with my other amps. The sh and "ch" sound is nowhere to be found but only pure prinstine highs exist. Somewhat sterile (not lively) voice/mid frequency that especially annoys at low level listening during the night became much more lively. Surprising even bass got more articulate. before it was undiscernible bass, now I hear melodies in bass. I am astonished in the way the new DIA-100 converys background sounds, reverberations and decay like good tube amps. You will hear effortlessly all the new sounds on the bass, and mid frequencies without any trace of grain. Simply it is no contest before and after the tuning. Dia-100 can now even be said sound like modern, high resolution, high power tube amp. Don't give up on the DIA-100. With a little tweak, it will ahame many amps that cost several times more.

Similar Products Used:

Krell, Musical Fidelity, PASS, DIY tube amps.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
5
[Oct 12, 2005]
Discriminator
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Clever, simple design for excellent value Heavy duty design Natural sound (if you're lucky) Drives tough loads with ease

Weakness:

Annoyingly bright (if you're unlucky) No subwoofer out Assembled by U.S. military Questionable quality control

This is my first review on this forum and I want to extend my sincere gratitude to all who have gone before me. I feel compelled to write this review because I think that I can shed some light on the debate over whether this amp is a clever design that produced an outrageously good deal, or an overly bright noise maker which makes an excellent door stop. From my experience it could be either depending on your luck. I auditioned the amp in the store's demo room where conditions and components had been optimized. I knew full well that I would not have a very good idea of how it sounded until I took it home and hooked it up to my Snells. Imagine my surprise when I took the unit out of the box and found that all of the letters on the face plate were double stamped! Can you say t-t-tuner? Of course I was too jazzed to stuff it back in the box without trying it out. I hooked it up and was immediately amazed at the detail I heard in the sound. Records sounded rich, full, and luxurious, but CDs sounded harsh and glaring. Since there was some doubt in my neophite mind as to whether this was a desirable state of affairs, I hung onto it for a few weeks. The sound did not change appreciably. I eventually found the time to exchange the unit, which the store was glad to do. The second unit looked AND sounded significantly different from the first! Gone were the d-double stamped letters, but more importantly the sound was flat. At first I was actually disappointed, but I soon came to realize that the previous amp had been too bright and the one I have now is pure and true. I have confirmed this by auditioning it with other speakers including NHT 2.9s which some find to be on the bright side. The 2.9s sounded natural and sweet. I will add that the DIA 100 had no trouble driving these notoriously power-hungry speakers to high output levels without apparent effort or excessive heating. I was auditioning a used pair of 2.9s and based on what I heard and have read I have decided to hold out for the NHT Fours which are coming out in a week or so. But I digress. What I have concluded from this experience is that quality control may not have been the best at Acurus. In a way it makes sense given the design. The amp has a single super-high gain stage which eliminates a preamp. The high current, high gain bipolar amp is a clever design in principle, but in the real world the sound could be several times (maybe even 10X) more sensitive to variations in the components in the gain stage. That hypothesis fits well with my experience, the differing observations reported here, and what I know about electrical engineering (I happen to have a Ph.D. in EE but it's not in analog amplifier design)! I will add that a DIA 150 reviewer stated that the amps were assembled by the U.S. military. In my mind that would explain why they are built like tanks, and perhaps also the double-stamped face plate and what seems to be questionable quality control. This amp has been with me for ten years so far and I have no intention of replacing it any time soon. I have never had any problems with it after exchanging the first defective unit. I may consider a separate subwoofer amp for the NHT Fours if the bass isn't solid but frankly I doubt I'll need one. The guy who owns the 2.9s was running 200 wpc Sunfire Cinema Grand Signature which retailed for $3500. I won't claim that the Acurus sounded as rich but I can honestly say that he was skeptical and that the performance of the Acurus with the 2.9s exceeded both of our expectations by a very significant margin. I can recommend this amp as an outstanding bargain on the used market.

Similar Products Used:

Pioneer (ick), Proton (yuk!), Harman Kardon, 1980s NAD 3300PE Power Envelope integrated amp (pretty good)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
5
Showing 1-10 of 46  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com