|
|
|
Top Ranked Products from Technics.
|
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: GAOO(Unregistered User)
(Audiophile)
Review Date July 6, 2000Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 1 of 7 Summary: I owned this receiver before AX6 and AX7. This was the best for stereo listening because of his power (120watts) but was so so in home theater; only 60 watts by channel for surround, compared to 120watts the rest. This made a real disproportion to sound (why the surround channel use 4 ohms speakers rear...). I also found that the 510 has a lack of bass. The voice (high and mid) are REALLY clear, too clear for the bass(i don't say that the bass isn't good, just that it needs boost). You absolutely need a subwoofer. The rest is okay and I consider this SA-EX510 an excellent receiver for stereo use. Very simple to use. The remote is too big with 1 millio of small buttons... Check the SF-DX7 combo package for the best sound in home theater mode!!! P.S. for people who say that SA-AX7 isn't good in stereo mode, you're wrong. The SA-AX7 just need more power. There is a big difference between 510 and AX7. Ax7 has a better clarity and definition of sound, but we can't compare... My System: Technics SA-AX7 receiver Technics SH-AC500D digital processor Technics SL-PD987 5 CD changer Technics RS-TR575 dual tape deck Panasonic GAOO CT-27XF26 TV Hitachi video DVD: coming soon! Subwoofer: 2 Kenwood 12" KFC-W3082 Built my own speakers... Strengths: low THD, high stereo output, design, display, class H+ circuitry Weaknesses: not so good in home theater system, need a bass boost(as the SA-AX7), not a good cooling system(work at very very high output) Similar Products Used: SA-AX6 SA-AX7
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jerry(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date February 8, 2000Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 4.67 of 5,
3.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 2 of 7 Summary: Amp is very impressive. Lots of power with my 200 watt Altec Lansing Speakers! Wife is always complaining!! lol The speakers cannot handle the power. The woofers are being pushed.
Recently tried the Technics SFDX7 Home Theater Unit and was not impressed with the stereo power. The SA-EX510 is far better when compared.
SA-EX510: Excellent for Music Sound Impressive with DVD's (I have a Panasonic DVD A120)
SFDX7: Pathetic for Music Sound (No Power in Stereo Mode) Excellent with DVD's (Most impressive sound that I ever heard!!)
Definately would have purchased the SFDX7 if it was 150 watt per channel in stereo and 100 x 6. Wouldn't hestitate.
The SA-EX510 is the best buy for those who cannot afford the higher end receivers (myself included!). Strengths: Excellent sound when playing CD's Weaknesses: Not Digital for DVD's Similar Products Used: Kenwood (older just with stereo, lots of power!!!)
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jerry(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date February 8, 2000Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year Visitors rate this review 5.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 3 of 7 Summary: Amp is very impressive. Lots of power with my 200 watt Altec Lansing Speakers! Wife is always complaining!! lol The speakers cannot handle the power. The woofers are being pushed.
Recently tried the Technics SFDX7 Home Theater Unit and was not impressed with the stereo power. The SA-EX510 is far better when compared.
SA-EX510: Excellent for Music Sound Impressive with DVD's (I have a Panasonic DVD A120)
SFDX7: Pathetic for Music Sound (No Power in Stereo Mode) Excellent with DVD's (Most impressive sound that I ever heard!!)
Definately would have purchased the SFDX7 if it was 150 watt per channel in stereo and 100 x 6. Wouldn't hestitate.
Best buy for those who cannot afford the higher end receivers (myself included!). Strengths: Excellent sound when playing CD's Weaknesses: Not Digital for DVD's Similar Products Used: Kenwood (older just with stereo, lots of power!!!)
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Brian(Unregistered User)
(Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date February 6, 2000Overall Rating
4 of 5
Value Rating
5 of 5
Used product for More than 1 year |
|  | |
Review 4 of 7 Summary: A very excellent choice for the money, but if you have a DVD player spend the extra money for Digital, the sound difference is awesome. Strengths: this receiver is powerful and has excellent sound reproduction Weaknesses: I wish I would have bought Digital Similar Products Used: Pioneer ( Garbage )
|
|
Rating Reviewed by: Jeff(Unregistered User)
( an Audio Enthusiast)
Review Date February 12, 1999Overall Rating
5 of 5
Visitors rate this review 1.00 of 5,
1.00 votes
|
|  | |
Review 5 of 7 Summary: After listening to my 35 watt Marantz (which still sounds decent, I must say) since 1975, I thought it was time I upgraded to a newer model. After doing some research in the mags and doing some comparison shopping, I decided to get the 510 about one year ago. I have not been disappointed, except that it lacks strong low end. That is probably more due to using Cerwin-Vega bookshelf speakers, which are excellent high and mid range, but not big enough for good low end. This Christmas I treated myself to a 150 powered JBL sub-woofer and now my system is complete! It is crystal clear in the high and medium range for classics, etc. and the sub-woofer really kicks it for jazz, rock, etc. If you want a really nice system for under $1500, get this receiver, the matching Technics 5 disk carousel CD player, the Technics dual tape deck, some decent bookshelf speakers, and a powered sub-woofer, and you can provide yourself and your neighbors with a wide variety of sounds!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audio and Video News & Press Releases.
|
|
|
|
Expert hi-fi audio reviews, blogs, and audio articles.
|
|
|