|
Review NaN of
, from Midway City, CA
Price Paid:
$100.00
from Best Buy Summary: My system
Harman Kardon Signature 2.0 preamp/processor
Harman Kardon Signature 2.1 5 channel power amp
Harman Kardon Citation 22 power amp
Harman Kardon 670 (Used as phono pre-amp)Harman Kardon ST8 turntable with Shure M97xE (Couldn't afford the V15)
Nakamichi RX505 cassette deck
Tascam 202 Mk III dual well cassette deck
Magnavox CDB650 CD player (Now dead)
JVC XV-FA95GD (DVD-Audio Player)
HK Citation 13 speakers
1 pair Koss CM/1030 (Used as subwoofer)
4 Koss CM/1020s (one for center channel, two as rear surrounds, and one which is used as a computer printer stand)
Background:
Truth be told, I am a vinyl enthusiast. I never really liked the CD format. I grant that a CD may be technically superior in some aspects than an old long playing licorice pizza, but listening to CDs was usually a fatigue inducing experience which required lots of alcohol to overcome.
Background:
This unit plays CDs, SACDs and DVDs. I did not buy it for its DVD playing abilities, although it is a nice bonus.
I bought this unit because my old Magnavox CD player finally died, and I wanted a CD player which handled SACDs. I had read several reviews which said SACD sounded really good, and that the technology and sound were better than DVD-Audio disks. I already owned a 7 disk JVC DVD-Audio player, so I know from personal experience that advanced resolution sound is very much superior to CDs, and better than most vinyl pressings. So, when I was able to convince the sales person to sell me the last open box unit and the floor demo for $225, I jumped on it and sent one to my mom for her birthday. Even if I used it as second DVD player, I came out ahead!
Impressions:
Using GOVI's album Andalusian nights, I did an A/B comparison of the analog output of the Sony to the Digital to Analog converters in the HK preamp. The sound quality from the Sony is not quite as good as the HK. This is noticable when listening to the decay in the tail end of a guitar note or precussion instrument. It is not very noticable, and may be the the result of the fact I am using mid-grade cable to connect the machine to the preamp. The tonal balance is similar and imaging is very good.
SACDs sound very good. My opinion is based on my listening to only two SACDs, Toto IV and James Taylor's Hourglass. Hourglass, in particular, shows the potential of the SACD. With a CD you always feel you have to turn the treble up or down to fix what is wrong with the sound. With the SACD, the balance is right. You can hear the air passing through Mr. Taylors voice box. The difference between CDs and SACDs is like the difference between a newspaper photograph and a high quality 8 X 10 glossy photograph. There is just much more information to make the picture lifelike.
Some SACDs also contain a 5.1 track as well as a stereo sound track. Many do not. While an audio purist may demand stereo and stereo only because you would not be surrounded with instruments on all sides when listening to a concert, I feel the surround sound track is better because there is more information available to reproduce the sound accurately, and it allows the artist more freedom to express himself/herself, wether it be to add a track for ambience of a concert hall or to allow the listener to hear the music in the manner of a member of the band. Strengths: SACDs sound great. Holds multiple disks. Excellent array of outputs plus an input for audio from the TV or VCR for external surround processing Weaknesses: Bad marketing by Sony.
No progressive scan. Similar Products Used: Pioneer DV-333 (DVD player); JVC XV-FA95GD (DVD Audio)
|