Sennheiser HD-500 Fusion Headphones

Sennheiser HD-500 Fusion Headphones 

DESCRIPTION

1999 headphone model

USER REVIEWS

Showing 1-10 of 36  
[Nov 13, 2012]
Søren Lauritsen
Casual Listener

I have had mine in 13 years now. And I still enjoy this model over most other... I dont understand the amount of criticism in here...

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 07, 2005]
quentez
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

great texture and stereo positing to the sound. when properly driven they sound great for the price

Weakness:

need a good amp/driver to sound good (or not sound bad)

These "cans" are getting unfair reviews. Granted that, as most people are saying, they can sound very boomy, muddy, and have too much bass, to a very large extent there is a good reason for this. Sennheiser's are known for needing a good driver, and sounding less than perfect otherwise (maybe even sounding bad, as these people are saying) When i first listened to these with my home stereo (a crappy kenwood mini system), i thought they had some promise in their ability to provide accurate sound positioning, so that I could hear effects and mixing in music that I had never heard before. However, I also felt that they were definately boomy/bassy/muddy, and when i listened to them through an RCA Lyra MP3 player, these negative characteristics were 3 or 4 times worse. they sounded awful! It wasnt until I listened to these headphones through a studio quality sound card on my computer (layla) and throuhg a quality amp (mackie VLZ series pre-amps), when I learned just how good these headphones could sound for the price. So i cant stress enough, these headphones will sound mediocre, bad, or even terrible (to someone looking for audiophile quality), when not properly dirven by either a good reciever/stereo, or through a headphone amp. When properly dirven, the boomy bass disappears almost completely and they provide incredible clear and precise sound and a distinguishible steroe field. another reviewer made a good point that they take a very long time to break in. I suggest everyone ignore the reviews by people who talk about how bad these headphones sound when listening to them through a portable CD player etc. I also sudggest that these headphones are not for you if this is what you plan on using them for (note: most sennheiser products need good amplification)

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
[Oct 02, 2004]
The Svenster
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

Cable on the left ear only. 'Modern look'

Weakness:

Sound absolutely terrible.

I was looking for a simple pair of headphones for little money today and had a choice between the HD500 and a Beyerdynamic DT331, both as special offers at a considerably reduced price. I decided to listen to them first in comparison - and boy, how glad I am now that I did! I used a CD with classical symphonic music. I started with the Beyerdynamic, which resolved practically every instrumental group on the soundstage, and sounded detailed, but maybe a little sharp in the trebles and weak in the bass. I thought - well, roughly what I would expect for under £30. Then I switched to the Sennheiser HD500, which was a little more expensive and I expected that it was going to be at least as good as the Beyerdynamic. NOT! The orchestra sounded as if I was listening to it through a thick door door to the concert hall. 'Boom boom boom' went the bass, then there were a few mids, but the treble region seemed almost completely wiped out! No soundstage whatsoever. I could not distinguish any instrument - just a thick mush. Really really bad. The funny thing was, I immediately concluded that the headphones were broken, and went for the pair of Beyerdynamics. It was only when I found the reviews on this website that I realised - these headphones were not broken, they really sound bad. Definitely not neutral.

Similar Products Used:

Beyerdynamic DT331, Beyer DT880 Studio

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
[Sep 24, 2004]
sunnysal
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

comfortable, good mids and highs.

Weakness:

BOOM, BOOM bass, for the teenager in you.

Too much bass! I bought these to replace an aging pair of grado sr-80s...I did not want to spend the money on the 580s or 600s so I went with what I thought would be a "baby of the line". well...NO...these phones exhibit SOME of the good sennheiser family values, they resolve well, they have clear mids and highs BUT they completely blow the bass out of proportion! To give you and example, I have a McIntosh integrated in my beddrom system hooked up to klipsch referecne series speakers, I also have a ADCOM equipment hooked up to magnapan speakers in my family room lastly a DHT 2A3 amp hooked to Klipschorns in my main system. These different combinations provide for varied audio results but NONE have the "thump, thump" bass of these phones. I kid you not, I had to turn the bass control on the McIntosh down half way just to get them in the ballpark of my other systems. I would compare these phones to those teenage cars you are forced to sit next to at stop lights; big thump, thump bass no real attempt at audio quality sound. to sum up, these do everything right in the mid and treble registers but the bass is many decibels too loud in the mix. look elsewhere.

Similar Products Used:

grado sr-80, stanton electrostatics, senn 580 and 600

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
3
[Mar 23, 2004]
Deoxy
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

It looks very expensive, Comfortable.

Weakness:

Muddy bass, Clogged Mid's and highs. Sounds like the music is coming from under your matress.

I have been dooped! I was searching for new headphones to buy so I went on the sennheiser website and found the Hd 500 to be within my price range. I read the description and boy did it sound good. "Superbly Clear", "Detailed Analytical sound". After I bought these headphones i truly realized how much of a fool i was. I first pluged this into my creative audigy live drive which is fairly high quality and noticed that the dialogue found in music was low, almost like when a person talks with his/her mouth covered. Then i played music with good bass, and it sounded muddy. I then realized that it might have been my live drive. So then i plugged these headphones into my Harman/Kardon reciever and played some music and noticed the same problems. I came to the conclusion that these headphones have muddy bass, which overpower the mids and highs. However i noticed an improvement when i increased the volume almost to full, but then it was uncomfortably loud. Then i brought my old Sony MDR-CD380 (79.99 CDN) headphones and did a comparison. The sony's were unbelievably better than the HD 500 and i couldnt believe it since the Sony is half the price. I then started to repeat the name Sennheiser in my head and remembered that this brand is german. These headphones being european have their prices atleast doubled when comming into north america, especially canada which results in the High price/Low performance rating. I called my uncle who lives in germany and he confirmed my hypothesis. He confirmed that these HD-500 headphones are found among the value headphones in electronic stores and are highly affordable in Germany, but when they're shipped to canada or USA, the price shoots through the roof. Unfortunately most people believe in the "higher the price" "higher the performance" stereotype, yet they fail to realize that product prices do not accurately represent the actual material/quality costs, rather they represent currency exchange and taxes added when crossing the atlantic. If you live in north america and you have a strict budget on headphones please stay away from european brands, rather go for Sony or other Japanese brands but if you have the money kindly go for the sennheiser hd-590 and + headphones.

Similar Products Used:

Sony, Sony, Sony (They are ideal for those looking for great quality with a modest price tag)

OVERALL
RATING
2
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jan 06, 2004]
A Reviewer
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

None oh wait...The packaging, maybe

Weakness:

-Muddy -Dull -Garbage

Garbage, Absolute garbage. I bought these thinking they would make up in bass what most transparent cans lack in Hip-Hop and Rap. Simply put they sound like sh!t. The 'extra bass' is just muddy noise, it doesn't even sound like bass. Don't even waste the time. If you want headphones with a bit more punch to them, go with the Sennheiser HD-280. They are studio phones, but they will get LOUD. The 280's are full of that tight, tooth rattling, bass some of us love, and they are a solid build. Same price as HD-500 on Amazon.

Similar Products Used:

Grado SR-125 Sennheiser HD-280, HD-590

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
[Oct 21, 2003]
sunnysal
Audio Enthusiast

Strength:

good price, good mids and highs.

Weakness:

the worst bass balance I have ever heard. BOOM, BOOM baby!

I bought these hoping that they would have the same family values as the much praised HD580s. I was shocked when I first tried them...BASS, BASS and more BASS. I have two other set of headphone to compare these with a pair of Grado 80s and a pair of Stanton Reference Ribbons. To achieve a similar response in the bass it was necessary to lower the bass tone control on my McIntosh Integrated amp (bedroom system) by 50% !!! I tried the same thing in my office system which uses a nice creek headphone amp and the BASS was unlistenable! to give it its due, the mids and treble were clear and well detailed, extened in the treble, etc. but I could not get past the boomy bass. I suspect that the positive reviews are by people who have not had decent phones to compare these to or listen to modern music iwth the bass pumped way up. This was so far out of whack that I could only think that it was defective (turns out not since the seller assured me that the customer's look for this boomy sound when they order the fusion) or of the sound that I hear from time to time at stop lights when some teens pulls up with the "boom, boom, boom" going and a big grin in their face, not really caring about the fidelity of the sound. Please audition these before buying them, especially if you fancy yourself any sort of music lover or audiophile, I am sure you will find them to have a tonal balance that, frankly, only a crazed teen could enjoy.

Similar Products Used:

grado, stanton, sony

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
3
[Jul 24, 2003]
Vaca232
Casual Listener

Strength:

-Huge bass, my old headphones sound like they don’t have any now. -Excellent sound quality-I’ve been noticing echoes and things in the background I never noticed. -Extremely comfortable. -Replaceable cord. -2 year warranty.

Weakness:

-Weak on highs a bit even after breaking them in. -LONG break in time. -Not very good for classical music,

I've been looking for a new set of headphones for a little bit to replace my Sony ones that broke, 2 Sony ones that broke actually. I borrowed my brothers, which were the same model. I don’t know the #, the Sony "street style" blue round ones with the volume control. My friend has a Sennheiser HD 590 and I love it. I wasn't going to spend that much money though. I looked into the HD 500, and it looked pretty good. A lot of audiophiles have said they are horrible...but a lot of audiophiles say a Cambridge soundworks Megaworks 210D is bad. I have one, and I love it. I’m not going to go spend $4000 in bookshelf speakers. CSW makes amazing stuff. But about the HD 500's, I had read that they're really not to great at highs, and I thought this might just be audiophiles being audiophiles and not sane people. When I first listened to the HD 500's, I was not very pleased with them, but I figured I'd give them a chance. I left them playing for around 20 hours, and took the foam pads out of them, this made a huge difference and the headphones sounded twice as good. They still sounded a bit muffled though, especially in classical music. After 2 weeks they sounded twice as good as they had after 20 hours. In most non-classical music, they sound great now, with just a little muffled sound. I wonder if they will sound even better with more play time. As long as you don’t abuse them, I think they will last a long time, and the detachable cord is great...and looong. The headphones are extremely comfortable and fit nicely. I have big ears and they fit fine. If your not an audiophile who will go out and spend $300 on headphones, or just insane and spend $14,000!! for an Orpheus, I think these headphones are fine. If you listen to just classical music, I wouldn’t recommend these headphones. They sound fine for everything else and have huge bass. While they are no HD 590, they're also quite a bit cheaper.

OVERALL
RATING
5
VALUE
RATING
4
[Jun 30, 2003]
Pascal philippe
Audio Enthusiast

This headphone is very poor for it's price ! Some people said it's worth the price. You can get very good headphones for the same price,like the AKG K240 (studio's favorite) Only medium Sennheiser make good high end headphones,but poor cheap headphones And we can't even say that 100 is cheap ! If you want good sennheiser,buy an hd590,hd600 or hd580...

OVERALL
RATING
1
VALUE
RATING
1
[Jan 18, 2003]
WWW
Casual Listener

Strength:

Price, comfortable

Weakness:

Nothing given the cost

I bought these for $50 a few months ago, if you a strapped for cash I would definitely recommend these. Like anything what sounds good to me might sound horrible to you. It cracks me up some of these "audiophile" people are even reviewing these. Maybe some of these people are plugging these into some crappy ass system that they bought a Best Buy or better yet the local radio shack. Anyway, I went out and bought a couple different pairs listened to them for a few weeks and kept these and the rest went back.

OVERALL
RATING
4
VALUE
RATING
4
Showing 1-10 of 36  

(C) Copyright 1996-2018. All Rights Reserved.

audioreview.com and the ConsumerReview Network are business units of Invenda Corporation

Other Web Sites in the ConsumerReview Network:

mtbr.com | roadbikereview.com | carreview.com | photographyreview.com | audioreview.com